• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

Extracts from this document...


Theory of Knowledge Knowledge issue: "When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?" Sensory perception is the reception and interpretation of knowledge through sight, hearing, touch, smell and taste. These five senses provide us with information as to what there is in the world and allow us to be aware of certain qualities of these things. It is exclusively through sensory perception that humans acquire knowledge of the external world, as all other ways of knowing are direct results of it. Emotion is chemical releases or nervous reactions in the body, both of which must be perceived, caused by the perception of an external event. Language is an external transmission of knowledge and therefore must be perceived to be utilized. Reason is the deduction or induction of knowledge and therefore must be based on an observation, which must also be perceived. Can this way of knowing be trusted? To determine the extent to which they can, I will examine the imperfections of the senses, and how reason and emotions may affect perception. Avicenna defined truth as, "what corresponds in the mind to what is outside it". Therefore, if the mind knows exactly what a table consists of at the most basic level, then one knows the truth of the table lying in front of them. ...read more.


When an artist paints a wooden table, he must recognize the various colour changes on the table, where it is lighter due to the way light falls on it, and even where the table appears white due to the reflection of this light. He must also notice that the shape of the table is only rectangular when looking at it from directly above, that there are always two obtuse and two acute angles when looking at the table from any other point of view. By noticing these details, an artist may reproduce what he sees and fool the mind into thinking that he has painted a brown rectangle. Thus, the role of the mind in acquiring sensory knowledge is to simplify what we perceive so as to be able to relate it to other experiences with an object that has been simplified to a similar thought in our mind. In relating these ideas, the mind is able to acquire knowledge of the object at hand without any more sensory testing. If this interpretation is gone about correctly, then it can be a great tool which allows at first induction and following this, the ability of deduction. ...read more.


Strong emotions may cause one to interpret a sensation in an incorrect manner. A man who hasn't drunk in a day, wandering through the desert may see heat waves rising off of the sand and interpret this as water evaporating form the surface of an oasis, a misinterpretation called a mirage. This man sees something that resembles the water that he craves desperately and due to his state is unable to reason properly, causing his emotions to convince him that what he sees is water despite this assumption being unreasonable. Another example is the traditional saying that he "is blinded by love". This phrase signifies that someone is unable to reason properly and interpret the actions of anther due to their overwhelming desire to love someone. To conclude, our senses cannot give us the truth of an object or event due to their imperfection. However, they do no not lie to us and are able to give us a certain truth, a partial truth. Once this sensation is recorded, we must be able to interpret this and though this may never be completely certain, it will be much more likely to be true if the perception corresponds with reason and that this reasoning is not blinded by emotion. As said by Descartes, the only thing I know for certain is "I think therefore I am." Word Count: 1590 ?? ?? ?? ?? Eamon O'Connor 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    He might not be giving me what he intended, but he is giving me something. That sharing of information is considered communication. The whole point of writing novels and plays is for them to be shared. Regardless of what is passed on, something is transferred from one being to another through the work.

  2. Seek simplicity and distrust it. (Alfred North Whitehead). Is this always a good advice ...

    These principles are guidelines developed through close observation of market behaviour but, according to Susan Mc Dade, one has to be careful, that general principles such as "people are individual utility maximisers" or "information flows freely"(Dombrowski& Rotenberg& Bick, 2007: 182) are generalised, simplified statements which do not always hold true.

  1. To what extent can we trust our perception?

    Therefore, it can be said that our perception of the world depends, not only upon our senses, but also upon our culture, values, beliefs and personal opinions. So, for example, some people believe that the death penalty is right and fair as those who commit severe crimes ( such as murder or rape)

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    Scientist's latest studies have shown that there is considerable genetic variation in our ability to smell. It has been recently discovered that "Widespread phenotypic diversity in human olfaction is, in part, attributable to prevalent genetic variation in OR genes." (Hasin-Brumshtein, Lancet and Olender), that each human has up to 800

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    whereas to them these voices are as real as water is for us. But how do we know that he is really hearing voices? This example shows that we can trust our sense but not fully because according to the realm of science, hearing voices is unnatural and basically means there is a malfunction in the brain.

  2. Choose two senses and explain how they have claims to knowledge.

    Which derives in new or "better" information, which always gets closer to the truth but it can never be fully reached. As a knower, I imagine myself in located at the beginning of a short corridor where I can see a blurred image of the truth in the end.

  1. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    As we now know both Aristotle and Plato?s beliefs had many merits in their time and yet in the modern age despite some flaws, certain facets of their ideas still hold true and are practiced regularly the world over. Many renowned scientists throughout history have done exactly as Plato suggested

  2. How far can we rely on our senses to tell us the truth?

    I remember reading a story named ?The Case for the Defence? by Graham Greene, a famous English novelist, which dealt with a strange murder trial.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work