• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Theory Of Knowledge Essay 1 Question #2: When should we trust our senses to give us the truth? Our senses are the primary linkage we have between our minds and the environment around us, the "faculty by which outside stimuli are perceived" (Newman); we rely on them for tactical, auditory, olfactory, gustatory and visual acquisition of knowledge. Our daily dependence on our five senses makes it even more fundamental for one to critically assess the information they convey - attempting to differentiate the truth from what is false. Truth is "a medium to express actuality" (Marian), and by assuming that reality can be known directly and certainly, the correspondence theory of truth suggests that truth is "when terms of true propositions map to elements of reality in a way that validates the proposition." (Marian) Discovering "truth" is based on the constant feeding of propositions to us through sense perception - and the ability to compare one's sensory perceptions to pre-existing knowledge and ascertain whether the information is congruent. In this essay, I shall attempt to show that sense perception cannot be trusted as an independent entity to give us truth, that only by striking a balance between trusting our senses and evaluating their congruence with pre-existing knowledge can a knower achieve perceptive yet insightful procurement of knowledge. ...read more.

Middle

However, occasions when sensory perceptions contradict a knower's expectations exist due to the unreliability of our senses. In the First Meditation of his Meditations on First Philosophy, Descartes writes:"Whatever I have up till now accepted as most true I have acquired either from the senses or through the senses. I observed, however, that these sometimes misled us; and it is the part of prudence not to place absolute confidence in that by which we have even once been deceived." (Descartes) Not placing absolute confidence in our senses does not mean questioning every single proposition derived from sensory perception, but instead considering them carefully. When a contradictory proposition is exposed to a knower, an intuitive response would be to critically evaluate this using his past experiences and knowledge. For example, the case of spatial disorientation, "A state characterized by an erroneous sense of one's position and motion relative to the plane of the earth's surface" (Shaw) whereby pilots are unable to accurately interpret aircraft altitude, altitude or airspeed in relation to the Earth, having to completely disregard sensory information and place full confidence on reference instruments. Our sense of balance is regulated by our inner ear's fluid, and pilots are often exposed to 10 to 20 seconds of constant angular acceleration while flying, rendering the sensation of motion transmitted to the brain false. ...read more.

Conclusion

Charles Wysocki, a neuroscientist at the Monell Chemical Senses Center in Philadelphia claims that this derives from the nasal epithelium, and when the ability to smell a specific substance is missing, so is the response in the brain. This can be traced back to the receptor - when you can't smell a substance, the most likely explanation is that the receptor for it is not expressed well. (McKernan) The smell of freesias is a classic example, an estimated 10 per cent of the British population is unable to detect this flower's scent. Since our senses are variated from person to person, others would have a wider spectrum of information to work with and may come up with other hypotheses on the same environment, rendering it hard to trust our senses to give us truth in the objective sense. In most cases, sense perception is essential for us to gain some evidence to support our knowledge claims, whether this evidence may be trusted or not, corroborating with our past personal experiences. However at times, our senses may deceive, warp and disfigure in the form of sensory perception, affecting our judgement of truth. One must involve other ways of knowledge to accurately achieve perceptive yet insightful procurement of knowledge, and senses cannot function as an independent entity to provide us with truth. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. This essay will explore how sense cannot be trusted to give us the whole ...

    Thus it can be seen here that senses can only give us certain 'truths' at certain points in time and never the whole truth of a given environment for example. We can trust our senses to give truth when they cohere with what is already known, in other words, preconceived notions.

  2. Art is a lie that brings us nearer to the truth (Pablo Picasso). Evaluate ...

    aspects to life and understanding [4]...Does this imply that a painting can never be viewed by anyone other than the artist because the visual concept of the piece cannot be truthfully seen by the observer? Empiricism however argues that people's minds are a lot like blank slates (tabula rasa created by Aristotle)

  1. Theory of Knowledge: perceptions. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge ...

    Other ways of knowing such as logic, acquaintance, experience, empathy and introspection are also able to cause sense perceptions to alter what we actually see, hear, feel..etc... Testing different ice creams in class, showed us that using our previous experiences and our logic of how each would taste were good enough reasons to get us close to correct answers.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    had ever previously seen with the naked eye: hundreds of prism-shaped cells lined up in rows, each cell with its own nucleus.

  1. Problems With Interpreting Meaning. What do the problems with interpreting meaning discussed by ...

    Slow is another example. Slow means something different when regarding a turtle than when regarding a track runner.

  2. TOK - Can we rely on perception to lead us to the truth

    Another 'Way of Knowing' is 'Reason'. Many religions believe that there is one god and acknowledge this as truth, but can we see or use any of our senses to prove that there is a god? A statement like this can only be proven through reason and science.

  1. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    This wavelength is very near the color of violet while still being within the boundaries of blue?s wavelength. The brain then processes this information; the wavelength of 494 nanometers that is, and then organizes it by saying that the light is blue.

  2. When (if ever) should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    Contradicting that however is the possibility that perhaps life itself is the truth, our very existence is a testament to the truth. Maybe those who do not seek ?the truth? but merely exist, live their lives with indifference to hypothetical and plausible explanations are those who have stumbled upon the truth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work