• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

Extracts from this document...


Phuong Tran 05/11/2007 Theory of Knowledge Question 2: When should we trust our senses to give us truth? One of the most concerning questions arose due to the growing sophistication of the human minds revolve around the existence and acquisition of truth. Truth, in itself, is the truest sense of meaning; it is the interpretation of truth that is creating the confusion all over; therefore, there must be flaws in the process of acquiring truth. Knowledge is the path leading to truth; however, it contains several flaws and misconception, therefore blocking our way to the "truest sense of meaning". How does one get to judge if a fact or idea gets to be a truth? We as humans have been subconsciously using the three coherence, pragmatic, and correspondence tests to determine whether we accept or reject anything we perceive. I would argue the coherence test would not be reliable; as I have struggled nearly my whole life to determine whether facts, ideas, theories, etc... offered to me are true or not, when all of them seem to fit. In all areas of knowledge, the knowledge we are getting are almost all second-handed. Some of them, especially in natural science and math, we are able to test with the application of the correspondence test; however, in other areas such as social science, ethnic, history, literature, and art, the only tests that can be applied seem to be pragmatism and coherence. ...read more.


We being humans, have, to some extent, only a limited ability to fully perceive and acknowledge the "real world". I personally believe in the aquatic ape theory for the human evolution; and I would argue that during the time when we haven't envolve into "humans" yet, our perception of reality would greatly differ from the one we have now, perhaps due to less capable eyesight. Or when we look at "solid" object, a chair, if one takes into account the fact that the neutrons, protons and electrons of an atom actually have huge spaces between them it becomes clear that the atoms that make up seemingly solid objects are made up of 99 % empty space. When so-called solid objects are seen in this light it becomes apparent that they can in no way be the seemingly solid objects they appear to be; and I would say these seemingly solid objects are more like images that we interpret as solid objects based on our imperfect perceptual conclusions. The human mind perceives and interprets, reality is what we make it and we can make it what every we want, a glass half full or half empty, we make our own realities based on what we allow ourselves to see, and usually we have a very narrow view. ...read more.


Truth, therefore might exist only on a personal level, as communication between humans has not reached the level where all thoughts and knowledge and be exchanged effectively. Human's conception of reality is different from any other species', due to the differences in our senses, just as the differents emotions, cultures, past experience affects each individual's senses, causing each human's perception of reality to be slightly different. Also, in my opinion, the only truth that humans care capable of obtaining is his own emotional state. Otherwise, we are not yet able to acquire universal truth due to the limitations of our senses and our biases in acquiring knowledge. Some believe that reality exists outside and independent of our senses and we are bound by our own perception of reality believing it is the truth, when in fact reality can be something completely different; other opinions state that it doesn't really matter if reality exists or not when we cannot perceive the truth to begin with. What is clear is that perception is never reality, it is the interpretation, or appearance of reality perceived by human senses; and it differs from person to person to a certain degree; therefore, we are incapable of obtaining universal truth. Word count : 1597. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. To what extent can we trust our perception?

    to a particular group of regions within the brain where the signals are received and interpreted.", then each time we perceive something through our sense-organs we automatically interpret it. As human beings it is almost impossible to stop ourselves from including our values and judgements in our interpretations.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    There is variation even within the scope of human sensory input capabilities, therefore they are not the same all the time. Humans do not have uniform senses and therefore some sense differently from others. This variation in human senses then provides those with more nimble senses more information about their

  1. Free essay

    When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    In some cases, truth and reality is considered to be the same thing. Real, in terms of truth, is merely "electrical signals interpreted by the brain" (Fishburne). In that respect, sense perception provides us with the actual electrical signals, which possibly come from language, that then get interpreted on the

  2. This essay will explore how sense cannot be trusted to give us the whole ...

    For example, scientists will look through a microscope in order to view a plasmolysed cell. The scientist knows it is a plasmolysed cell because of a certain way the cell looks like through the microscope.

  1. Context is all (Margaret Atwood). Does this mean that there is no such thing ...

    Is there a definitive right and wrong or can the ends justify the means? I think these are the most difficult questions to answer. In various religions there is a sacrificial elements, the one that comes into mind is Christianity where God gave his only son to settle the sins of the whole world.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

    For example hallucinations can affect all five of our senses and they cause us to experience things that are not part of reality. Hallucinations can be caused by brain disorders or even sensory defects. Thus the person needs someone else to confirm that what we see, hear or smell is real when he has hallucinations.

  1. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    However, they are not. Thus, whenever the brain receives information on those assumed parts; the brain realizes that it was wrong in assuming those parts were black and changes the black parts in the physical representation of the illusion to white parts.

  2. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    We see what we want to see or, even better, what we believe that should be there. The power of expectations is another major factor in this case. Expectations have long been a topic of psychological research, and it?s well known that they affect how we react to events, or even how we respond to medication.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work