• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Phuong Tran 05/11/2007 Theory of Knowledge Question 2: When should we trust our senses to give us truth? One of the most concerning questions arose due to the growing sophistication of the human minds revolve around the existence and acquisition of truth. Truth, in itself, is the truest sense of meaning; it is the interpretation of truth that is creating the confusion all over; therefore, there must be flaws in the process of acquiring truth. Knowledge is the path leading to truth; however, it contains several flaws and misconception, therefore blocking our way to the "truest sense of meaning". How does one get to judge if a fact or idea gets to be a truth? We as humans have been subconsciously using the three coherence, pragmatic, and correspondence tests to determine whether we accept or reject anything we perceive. I would argue the coherence test would not be reliable; as I have struggled nearly my whole life to determine whether facts, ideas, theories, etc... offered to me are true or not, when all of them seem to fit. In all areas of knowledge, the knowledge we are getting are almost all second-handed. Some of them, especially in natural science and math, we are able to test with the application of the correspondence test; however, in other areas such as social science, ethnic, history, literature, and art, the only tests that can be applied seem to be pragmatism and coherence. ...read more.

Middle

We being humans, have, to some extent, only a limited ability to fully perceive and acknowledge the "real world". I personally believe in the aquatic ape theory for the human evolution; and I would argue that during the time when we haven't envolve into "humans" yet, our perception of reality would greatly differ from the one we have now, perhaps due to less capable eyesight. Or when we look at "solid" object, a chair, if one takes into account the fact that the neutrons, protons and electrons of an atom actually have huge spaces between them it becomes clear that the atoms that make up seemingly solid objects are made up of 99 % empty space. When so-called solid objects are seen in this light it becomes apparent that they can in no way be the seemingly solid objects they appear to be; and I would say these seemingly solid objects are more like images that we interpret as solid objects based on our imperfect perceptual conclusions. The human mind perceives and interprets, reality is what we make it and we can make it what every we want, a glass half full or half empty, we make our own realities based on what we allow ourselves to see, and usually we have a very narrow view. ...read more.

Conclusion

Truth, therefore might exist only on a personal level, as communication between humans has not reached the level where all thoughts and knowledge and be exchanged effectively. Human's conception of reality is different from any other species', due to the differences in our senses, just as the differents emotions, cultures, past experience affects each individual's senses, causing each human's perception of reality to be slightly different. Also, in my opinion, the only truth that humans care capable of obtaining is his own emotional state. Otherwise, we are not yet able to acquire universal truth due to the limitations of our senses and our biases in acquiring knowledge. Some believe that reality exists outside and independent of our senses and we are bound by our own perception of reality believing it is the truth, when in fact reality can be something completely different; other opinions state that it doesn't really matter if reality exists or not when we cannot perceive the truth to begin with. What is clear is that perception is never reality, it is the interpretation, or appearance of reality perceived by human senses; and it differs from person to person to a certain degree; therefore, we are incapable of obtaining universal truth. Word count : 1597. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    In yet another area of knowledge, math, language plays a different role. I think that math is the only area of knowledge in which languages is of no real importance. Yes, numbers are a form of communication however in math as a class, as an area of knowledge, I do not use it to transfer any type of data.

  2. Perception. Factors such as a persons educational background, culture, societal norms and expectations, media, ...

    The way a person views the world is also affected by a basic human need to align thoughts and actions, and to eliminate inconsistencies, what in psychological terms is known as cognitive dissonance. A person has a need to bring thoughts into alignment with actions.

  1. To what extent can we trust our perception?

    to a particular group of regions within the brain where the signals are received and interpreted.", then each time we perceive something through our sense-organs we automatically interpret it. As human beings it is almost impossible to stop ourselves from including our values and judgements in our interpretations.

  2. Difference of Truth and knowldge

    The theory was challenged, disproved and modified. When a theory cannot be disproved, it becomes "a law" which is considered "the truth" until it is shown to be false, which is still possible. This is where passionate conviction disappears, and the statement "It is certain" emerges. One could consider this as a pathway - passionate conviction to

  1. Theory of Knowledge: perceptions. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge ...

    Some people perceive things, process them in their minds and when repeated, say something completely different. Each person interprets raw data differently, based on their culture, beliefs, intuition, and history, consequently outcomes result over a range of many different ideas.

  2. Science gives us a tool to work out whether what we experience is real ...

    Many people today have no trust in society?s leaders and figures of authority. Would you ask the Prime Minister of England to explain the relatively simple nature of Plate Tectonics (the theory that the earth?s major land-masses move around the surface of the planet and are the cause of earthquakes and numerous other natural phenomena)?

  1. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    People seem to experience reality not as it is, but as they expect to be. And the truth is, that no human being can escape his or her expectations and the effect they have on their perception of the world.

  2. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    However, many people fall into authority worship. From my experience, I feel like I fall into authority worship very easily. Since I do not like to obtain knowledge from books, or any reading, I mostly learn from what other people say.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work