• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

Extracts from this document...


Phuong Tran 05/11/2007 Theory of Knowledge Question 2: When should we trust our senses to give us truth? One of the most concerning questions arose due to the growing sophistication of the human minds revolve around the existence and acquisition of truth. Truth, in itself, is the truest sense of meaning; it is the interpretation of truth that is creating the confusion all over; therefore, there must be flaws in the process of acquiring truth. Knowledge is the path leading to truth; however, it contains several flaws and misconception, therefore blocking our way to the "truest sense of meaning". How does one get to judge if a fact or idea gets to be a truth? We as humans have been subconsciously using the three coherence, pragmatic, and correspondence tests to determine whether we accept or reject anything we perceive. I would argue the coherence test would not be reliable; as I have struggled nearly my whole life to determine whether facts, ideas, theories, etc... offered to me are true or not, when all of them seem to fit. In all areas of knowledge, the knowledge we are getting are almost all second-handed. Some of them, especially in natural science and math, we are able to test with the application of the correspondence test; however, in other areas such as social science, ethnic, history, literature, and art, the only tests that can be applied seem to be pragmatism and coherence. ...read more.


We being humans, have, to some extent, only a limited ability to fully perceive and acknowledge the "real world". I personally believe in the aquatic ape theory for the human evolution; and I would argue that during the time when we haven't envolve into "humans" yet, our perception of reality would greatly differ from the one we have now, perhaps due to less capable eyesight. Or when we look at "solid" object, a chair, if one takes into account the fact that the neutrons, protons and electrons of an atom actually have huge spaces between them it becomes clear that the atoms that make up seemingly solid objects are made up of 99 % empty space. When so-called solid objects are seen in this light it becomes apparent that they can in no way be the seemingly solid objects they appear to be; and I would say these seemingly solid objects are more like images that we interpret as solid objects based on our imperfect perceptual conclusions. The human mind perceives and interprets, reality is what we make it and we can make it what every we want, a glass half full or half empty, we make our own realities based on what we allow ourselves to see, and usually we have a very narrow view. ...read more.


Truth, therefore might exist only on a personal level, as communication between humans has not reached the level where all thoughts and knowledge and be exchanged effectively. Human's conception of reality is different from any other species', due to the differences in our senses, just as the differents emotions, cultures, past experience affects each individual's senses, causing each human's perception of reality to be slightly different. Also, in my opinion, the only truth that humans care capable of obtaining is his own emotional state. Otherwise, we are not yet able to acquire universal truth due to the limitations of our senses and our biases in acquiring knowledge. Some believe that reality exists outside and independent of our senses and we are bound by our own perception of reality believing it is the truth, when in fact reality can be something completely different; other opinions state that it doesn't really matter if reality exists or not when we cannot perceive the truth to begin with. What is clear is that perception is never reality, it is the interpretation, or appearance of reality perceived by human senses; and it differs from person to person to a certain degree; therefore, we are incapable of obtaining universal truth. Word count : 1597. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. Our senses tell us that a table, for example, is a solid object; science ...

    In math class, I am given questions that I must solve. The solutions or even the method that I use to get there does not give me any type of information. It is relatively useless in that sense. Math is very much a fusion of abstract and physical.

  2. Perception. Factors such as a persons educational background, culture, societal norms and expectations, media, ...

    News reports of the same incident may differ dramatically from one news agency to another, depending on which society is being targeted, and the media will often shape the news to appeal to the audience. However, this in itself creates a filter through which the audience will view the world.

  1. To what extent can we trust our perception?

    to a particular group of regions within the brain where the signals are received and interpreted.", then each time we perceive something through our sense-organs we automatically interpret it. As human beings it is almost impossible to stop ourselves from including our values and judgements in our interpretations.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    There is variation even within the scope of human sensory input capabilities, therefore they are not the same all the time. Humans do not have uniform senses and therefore some sense differently from others. This variation in human senses then provides those with more nimble senses more information about their

  1. When should we trust our senses to give us the truth?

    Unfortunately, reason can be used incorrectly. A sound argument is one in which the previous knowledge is true. A valid argument is one in which the previous knowledge guarantees that the new conclusion is true. Therefore, for an argument of reason to prove a truth, it must be both valid and sound.

  2. When should we trust our senses to give us truth?

    So it is not useful to trust your senses when trying to get truth from a mentally ill person. However a mentally "healthy" person can also be deluded from the truth as well. A girl sees her boyfriend hugging another girl.

  1. To what extent do our senses give us knowledge of the world as it ...

    People seem to experience reality not as it is, but as they expect to be. And the truth is, that no human being can escape his or her expectations and the effect they have on their perception of the world.

  2. Tok vocabularies - defining terms like "Truth" and "Belief"

    Expert opinion is, as the word suggests, an opinion of a person who knows a lot about a certain topic. A person with deep and wide variety of knowledge with many experiences of a topic could be an expert. What they say is expert opinion and people that are not experts tend to believe them without doubt.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work