• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When you encounter a controversial knowledge claim,such as that the moon landings were faked,or that we shold not experiment on animals,how do you evaluate wether or not to accept it as true? (Do some ways of knowing have more influence in making your jud

Extracts from this document...


TOK Essay Alba Ramaj Topic:`When you encounter a controversial knowledge claim,such as that the moon landings were faked,or that we shold not experiment on animals,how do you evaluate wether or not to accept it as true? (Do some ways of knowing have more influence in making your judgement? Or is authority and the group you indentify with more important) When we first began the TOK course,i remember that one of the first thing we discussed about this subject is the open discussion we could do,expressing our knowledge and deal in the same time with others knowledge.As a result,controversial knowledge is present almost in each discussion we have in real life. What knowledge is? What do we understand with knowledge claim? Knowledge; according to Plato; it can be summarized in three words: justified,true, and belief where the truth it is objective (based on facts) and belief is subjective (represent our opinion).I can say i know something if i believe in it,if it is true and if i can justify it by giving some evidence.This definition of knowledge has become the most popular definition ever. Justifying means the reason and evidence that we give to make stronger our claim if something is true or not for example:In Moon Landing documetary ...read more.


true fact were strong and convicing in the masses,it can be mentioned the sky without stars,the wind which caused the movement of the flag, the movement of sand particles while the austronauts walked,the video which showed that Moon Landing was created in a studio or to show that USA gained against USSR.But still the fact that the trip to Moon is continuing in present,the live transmittion of Moon Landing in all the TV and the fact that USSR didn`t oppose it,make the claim that Moon Landing is true stay stronger as well.In both claims we should use reasons to justify them.As Descartes believed the only way to achieve certainity and knowledge was to follow the path of reason.But the evidence given created a moderate scepticism which represents a non extreme scepticism,it simply holds that we cannot be sure that any of our beliefs are true.There were people that believed that Moon landing was fake,other thought it was true and others were sceptic.The phenomenon of justifying your beliefs and your knowledge claims by using reason it is called rationalism.People can say that Moon Landing was true maybe because they might be Americans and they want this to be true.This way of knowing it is called emotion.But people who used to ...read more.


stop the experiments on them for the only reason that there was no other solution to develop science; by using 100 animals can be saved 100000 human lifes; science was trying to find the right formula through computers system and at the moment that this would be achieved experiments on animals would stop automatically.Basically,what was he trying to say was that animals are important,but not as important as humans and that we need these kind of testing to prevent any catastrophic health situation within us.The boy convinced the masses,and as a my conclusion i think that rationalism,reason is more convincing and stronger than emotions in n knowledge claim. Sense perception is also one of the most important things in TOK.Knowledge gained throught observing and experimenting which is tightly related to sense perception. The problem is that our senses,can be not accurate (optical illusions); as a result all we gained through sense perception can be wrong and we can be sceptic about what we know. But i must highlight that it is too difficult to use one of each way of knowing when you argue,usually they are found mix,reason mixed with emotion,language and sense perception.The most important question that remains is:`how can be sure that we know what we know?` ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate Theory of Knowledge essays

  1. We see and understand things not as they are but as we are. Discuss ...

    However, I would never find the "truth" since nothing is truly exists in our world, what I see is not accurate, I may see the acceleration of one motion, after measuring the velocity and displacement of the car, I may calculate out the acceleration from my observation, but there is

  2. TOK Discuss the theories that claim the 1969 Apollo Moon Landing was either a ...

    According to NASA, the flag did not seem to fully extend, the result was that it looks as if it is waving (http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html#flag). This agrees with scientific logic the air isn't moving the flag but the cloth is itself after reacting to the movement of the horizontal rod.

  1. What can be meant by the Panchantantra saying, Knowledge is the true organ of ...

    purpose of the non-coding DNA to the name "junk DNA", which would have thus influenced people's perceptions of the non-coding DNA, it was these preconceived ideas which lead us to discover that the non-coding DNA had a purpose.

  2. "What I tell you three times is true." (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula - ...

    experience to too strong, and we see how empirical knowledge has more power that the source of language in this case. Belief has great influence on the truth. If you believe in something you are more likely to see the truth in it, whereas a person that does not believe

  1. What I tell you three times is true. (Lewis Carroll) Might this formula ...

    The repetition of information must be accompanied with a certain level of authority in order for us to induce the truth from constantly repeated information that is presented to us.

  2. There are no absolute distinctions between what is true and false. Discuss.

    with the object (work of art) that the subjectivity of truth in art is made manifest. In literature, although the effect and catharsis evoked in each reader may be profound, this doesn't mean that the dramatic effects such as epiphany are identical. Each person is impacted in a different manner.

  1. Examine the Claim That It Is Possible to Attain Knowledge Despite Problems of Bias ...

    So doesn?t this show that natural sciences have to biased and selective right from the start of any experiment? And because facts are not found by chance, scientists must know where to start and what to look for. Therefore, scientists will have a constructed idea of what they?re searching for

  2. How can the different ways of knowing help us to distinguish between something that ...

    For example when I was a child I would feel happy when I saw superheroes such as superman saving people and being killed but not die, I would think that all human beings could do that and so I could do that.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work