• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Commentary on the second half of Act 3 in Aton Chekovs The Cherry Orchard

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

World Literature Assignment 2c Commentary on the second half of Act 3 in Aton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard Session: May 2010 Candidate number: 000480 010 Word Count: 1054 This passage is taken from the second half of Anton Chekov's The Cherry Orchard, the story of a Russian family as it deals with problems of family and finance. Alongside the death of the father and his only son, the two daughters - Varya and Anya - and their uncle find themselves having to face Lyubov, an escapist mother, and the potential loss of all their property. In the aforementioned extract in Act 3, which is the climax of the play, the entire family finds itself in Lyubov's ironically extravagant and completely whimsical party while they await news from the auctioning of the orchard. Chekov amplifies the anticipation and suspense in the scene through varied diction and syntax within intensely paced dialogue. The resulting atmosphere, aided by a clever vehicle, ultimately highlights the dominant theme of closure as opposed to ambiguity as different characters have different reactions towards the life-altering revelation of a family friend. ...read more.

Middle

As Firs rants through the scene, he is effectively established as a one-dimensional figure with a consistent inability to let go of the past. As his conservativeness obstructs his capacity to absorb the potential loss of the cherry orchard, readers are left with a sense of uncertainty with respect to his fate. Similar yet more significant in the scene is Lyubov herself, who is "overcome" and faints at the news of the sale of the orchard. Her incapacity to accept the circumstances and her loss of something so close to her heart restricts her from fully obtaining closure. Upon hearing the first part of the news from her brother Gayev, she inquires "sold to whom?" giving readers an impression of the fixation of her thoughts revolving around the orchard. The distress and grief that she feels is made evident through numerous stage directions: in page 372, she talks "impatiently, through tears"; she "sinks into a chair and weeps bitterly" when she hears of Lopakhim's purchase of the estate in page 376. ...read more.

Conclusion

He now finds himself the owner of the estate in which his parents were once serfs, a significant fact that acts as a vehicle for the dynamic aspect of his own character. As a result of his meaningful initiative, Lopakhim is pegged as a figure that has no trouble flowing with the current of time towards the future. As the reader approaches the end of the passage, the underlying irony of the scene, evoked by the emotional extremes shown between characters, serves to masterfully convey a message of morals. Through the use of diction and syntax specific to each figure, Chekov successfully creates an intensely paced series of dialogues that provide a subtle yet clear indication as to who receive closure after the turn of events and who do not. The physical health of each character acts as a conceptual metaphor for their individual tone: while Lopakhim is elated and seemingly immune to pain, Lyubov actually loses consciousness and at the same time Firs appears to be nearing his final moments. As the climax of the play finally arrives, Chekovs reveals the true nature of each character and thus effectively conveys the theme of closure versus ambiguity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. How to write a commentary

    To illustrate the difference quickly ask students to write down three or four words that they associate with "milk". Tell them not to think, just jot down words as they come into their head. As each student tells the class their words write them on the board.

  2. It was the colossal vitality of Gatsbys illusion that ultimately destroyed him.

    him for being "new money"; someone was still not able to buy into the exclusive area of East Egg.

  1. Gusev Analysis. Chekov brings up two ordinary characters that are suffering under the ...

    Apparently there is an incomparable difference between Pavel Ivanitch's and Gusev's attitudes to suffering, which mirrors the gulf in nineteenth century Russian society between the intelligentsia and the peasants. Ivanitch does not make much attempt to persuade Gusev and he does not listen too much of what Pavel Ivanitch says too.

  2. Hamlet commentary

    Shakespeare has shown Hamlet to have hatred for women as well as showing that Hamlet possesses a tendency to generalize certain things, such as the generalization of women, based on his mother's behaviour. It can be seen that Hamlet considered Gertrude to be corrupt and therefore felt immense hatred towards

  1. Considering Chekhovs The Cherry Orchard, compare the effects of some arrivals and departures from ...

    Firs being not such a major character also contributed to the understanding and the complexity of the play. Another example could be the drunken man who passes by asking for directions and insulting the gayev's, and being a nuisance. This happened when they were lazing around gayev's estate.

  2. The Second Coming - A Commentary on William Butler Yeats

    It is written in a very rough iambic pentameter, but exceptions are so frequent that it actually seems closer to free verse with frequent heavy stresses. Instead of consistency within structure, many echoes are found in lines such as ?Turning and turning??, or ?The falcon? the falconer?, ?Surely? is at

  1. Frankenstein Commentary Essay

    the crimes they were committing upon others, but were so consumed with their pursuit they did not care about the effects of their actions. However, near the end of the story the Monster feels remorse of what he has done, whereas Victor did not.

  2. Character of Louba Ranevsky in The Cherry Orchard by Anton Chekhov

    She vacillates in her resolutions unwaveringly, being metaphorically blind, and is wholly, swayed by her emotions rather than reason. The context of the lines is Lopakhin?s sincere advice to Louba to get the Cherry Orchard transformed into villas in order that she can pay her debts.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work