• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Good and Evil - how do two Modern Classic Texts, The Lord of the Flies and The Crucible, reflect real life contemporary issues?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

ARE HUMANS BORN INHERENTLY EVIL IS THERE SUCH THING AS MORAL GOODNESS HOW DO THE TEXTS STUDIED IN CLASS REFLECT REAL LIFE CONTEMPORY ISSUES There has to be evil so that good can prove its purity above it - Buddha. Humanity's thinking is conditioned by the ideals of the society around it. In order to run functionally the masses of society must support and uphold society's ideals. So society names acceptable, or encouraged, ideals good and the actions society disallows or forbids are called evil. Every day we see atrocious acts committed on the news. Even when the world condemns acts of evil they still occur, One then wonders why crimes are committed, whether these sins are an act of nature (that the perpetrator is born with certain evils) or is it instead that society has taught these people to be hateful and commit crimes, with this uncertainty In mind I set about investigating the questions; are humans inherently evil? Is there such thing as 'moral goodness'? And how do two Modern Classic Texts, 'The Lord of the Flies' and 'The Crucible', reflect real life contemporary issues? The sociological choices within 'The Lord of the Flies' reflects the evils of real life societal flaws. William Golding's 'The Lord of the Flies' is a novel based on the exploits of a group of boys aged from six to ...read more.

Middle

In the crucible we see a spectrum of good and evil actions. John Proctor, the protagononist in 'The Crucible' shows elements of goodness and evil. He shows elements of self-defined evil by committing adultery early in the play, however later on he shows great remorse for his evil. I don't believe from this evidence that Proctor is inherently evil he just committed an evil action. I think that people may make poor choices, but it does not make them evil, there is always a capacity for good within people and Proctors recognition of his evil and his plead to god for redemption shows his good equally as much as his adultery shows his evil. The Capacity for good is also shown by proctor later in the play when many in the town are convicted of witchcraft by the town officials, the madness shown in Salem has been repeated throughout history, as mankind will disregard their morals to ensure their own safety, however although most men would lie and confess that they were witches Proctor refused to give up his dignity and would sacrifice his life rather than sign his name to a lie which was unjust, I think this demonstrates impeccable good from proctor to die for a cause is the ultimate sacrifice and to die for a good cause takes courage, and courage is a form of moral goodness. ...read more.

Conclusion

In Conclusion I believe that no one really knowingly does wrong. If a person really understands in the fullest sense that something is wrong then they do not do it, conversely if you do do it, this shows that you have not properly grasped, deep down, that it is wrong. This to me means that virtue becomes a matter of knowledge, and until a clear definition for justice or evil is defined then it is as impossible to call somebody universally evil as it is to call a piece of artwork universal beautiful. I believe that people aren't inherently evil, they are born morally neutral, if the morals of humans exist on a scale of goodness then for every good act there must be a relative evil act, some may exhibit more traits of good, some more of bad, but this is based on how the experiences of the perpetrators have molded their morals, and the placement of the acts on the scale depends also on who it is that defines their acts as being good or evil. With that in mind I think that Humans aren't inherently evil, they are born neutral and should rise above evil, and it is our job as a society to teach and guide the next generation so that the evils of tomorrow are insignificant compared to the good. "There has to be evil so that good can prove its purity above it" - Buddha. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Lord of the Flies Critical Analysis

    However, the reasoning behind choosing adolescents in the book is probably because they are under the control of adults in society and the book released that idea, furthering the idea of loss of control. Lord of the Flies was likely written towards an older audience, concerning human nature and the maintenance of control in society.

  2. Fascism in Lord of the Flies

    When finding out there was a beast, a greater power, the kids would be traumatized and incapable of thinking and making choices in their right mind. At that stage, while helpless, Jack could take advantage of anyone's weak spot and manipulate their beliefs.

  1. In The Road, the boy, a kid with innocence and the father are moving ...

    and didn't wanted to live to in a world full of chaos and cannibalism. She was also carrying the fire, meaning at first she also had a lot of hope but as time went by her flame starting decreasing, meaning she lost her hope and eventually die because she couldn't

  2. How does Showboat raise issues of race in American culture and bring serious issues ...

    Which is another strong issue that showboat brings up. The fear of being caught is shown when Julie sings a song 'Can't help loving that man of mine' and queenie recognizes the song. The subtext says ' a swift terror steals across her face' this gives an impression of Julie's initial reaction.

  1. Lord of the Flies Allegory Essay

    Later, after most of the boys have joined Jack?s tribe, Ralph blows the conch and ?silence? falls upon the boys. This demonstrates that the conch still retains influence over the children. When the conch shatters, the significance of the conch ceases to exist.

  2. Lord of the Flies Summary and Analysis of Chapters 7,8,9 and 10

    * Simon's terror causes him to faint * There is a persuasive power in the instinct of chaos and savagery that the Lord of the Flies represents. * In the glade, Simon realizes that there is no real monster that inspires the hunters' behavior; it's actually the barbaric instinct that lies deep within them.

  1. Literary Analysis: Julius Caesar v. The Lord of the Flies

    Additionally, Brutus plays a great role in the decision making process of the Conspirators than does Piggy with the stranded boys. Before the Conspirators start planning their assassination, a Conspirator, specifically Cinna, says, "0 Cassius, if you could\ But win the noble Brutus to our party-" (Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Act I, Sc.

  2. In William Goldings Lord of the Flies, and in John Knowles A Separate Peace, ...

    get out of hand and lose sight of what is the morally or socially correct action to take. These actions include even the basics of civilization and evolution, such as excreting waste in the appropriate designated area. These are not the least of the problems the boys face though.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work