• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17

How and to what effect does the use of language empower Higgins and transform Eliza in G.B. Shaws Pygmalion?

Extracts from this document...


Extended Essay Category 1 How and to what effect does the use of language empower Higgins and transform Eliza in G.B. Shaw?s Pygmalion Content * Title page???????????????????1 * Content????????????????????2 * Abstract???????????????????...3 * Introduction??????????????????.4 * Social Class Distinction?????????????..4 * Gender Inequality ??????????????..?9 * Conclusion??????????????????.15 * Bibliography?????????????????...17 ________________ Abstract: While reading Pygmalion, I was fascinated by the intricate details of language and how it affected the identity of Eliza. Realizing that language and identity were somehow connected in Pygmalion, I dove deeper into this issue and researched the effect of language on the social identities of Eliza and Henry Higgins. Keeping all this in mind, I came to formulate the research question ?How and to what effect does the use of language empower Higgins and transform Eliza?? Shaw felt that the only way to improve ones position in society was by improving their language. He was determined to raise the social consciousness of his audience while emphasizing the use of language. Shaw portrays this through Higgins and Eliza in Pygmalion who are at the opposite ends of society. This essay is a development of Shaw?s frame of thought. This essay is divided into two sections where each will be analyzing an area of inequality that set back England?s progression in Shaw?s view. The first section focuses on the social class distinction; Shaw tries to highlight the use of language. In his perception, the language that the two characters used defined their identities. I will be arguing that the language doesn?t define their identities but rather steals it away. The second section focuses on gender inequality and how according to Shaw, the improvement of education and language would reduce the gender inequality. I would then argue that language doesn?t hold a connection to the gender inequality in the society. Rather, language is only used to demoralize Eliza. I will also be stressing the fact that as a well refined lady, Eliza faces an identity crisis and more gender inequality than she did living on the streets as a common girl. ...read more.


Twenty years before Pygmalion was written George Grissing voiced the opinion of most of the people about the hopelessness of social progress. He stated: ?The London work girl is rarely capable of raising herself or being raised, to a place on life above that to which she was born; she cannot learn how to stand and sit and move like a woman bred to refinement, any more than she can fashion her tongue to graceful speech.?[15] ?Equality and inequality in social terms are thereby proven to be both extrinsic and subjective; this is clearly Shaw?s thesis from a socialist point of view?[16]. The people, who don?t meet these criteria, have no other option but to survive in the streets such as the corner of Tottenham Court Road. Most people unconsciously make preconceptions about a character taking into mind different attributes such as gender, age, level of education etc. Due to these preconceptions, people often assume the characters personality and class in context to their decisions. Leah Zuidema claims that ?these assumptions are not inconsequential thoughts. People act on their ideas, and, as a result, prejudice becomes active discrimination?[17] Eliza and Higgins are created to contrast each other entirely. The man is educated, and the woman is illiterate; the man is smart, and the woman is senseless; the man is reasonable, and the woman is emotional, etc. Higgins is a naturally selfish misogynistic celibate. Exactly how Eliza accuses him as one in the beginning of the play. "Oh, you've no feeling heart in you; you don't care for nothing but yourself."[18] Higgins being fluent in his speech is able to make statements such ?treating all people the same, as in heaven, where there are no third-class carriages?[19] at first leaves his audiences in awe but later they realize that these are only excuses for his crude remarks towards Eliza and his careless habit of dismissing manners. ...read more.


At this realization, Higgins has no choice but to accept the situation as what it is. His creation is not entirely his anymore; the creation has started to create itself. And that she is, in fact probably going to be a better creator for further more pupils to come. Higgins? has to accept Eliza as his equal or maybe more. Conclusion Although language plays a huge role in creating the identities of the two characters, in this play it does not completely overpower their identities. In terms of social class distinction, the language used by the characters of different societies created their identities only as a use of identifying their origins. The ironical part is that the lower class characters such as Eliza are much more humane and likeable to the audiences than the higher class characters such as Higgins. The language used by Higgins throughout the play is condescending and harsh which corrupts his identity and leads him to believe in the male dominated society. Thus, he is not a character in the favor of social progression. Eliza however is the opposite because she goes against the norms of the societies and decides to educate herself and build a new identity for herself. Although, her old identity is lost in the process of acquiring the new one which she, at times, regrets losing. A connection between the language and gender inequality creating an identity is solely based on the actions and reactions of the characters. The language aspect is only used to emphasize on their identities whereas their identities are also presumed by the characters use of language creating a paradox. Eliza, by the end of the play realizes that even though she achieves her ambitions of becoming a lady fit enough to work in a flower shop, she also has to carry the burden of a lady who is expected to be demure and innocent. The realization sets in when she realizes that as a common girl, she had more liberty to do as she wished without it being questioned whereas, as a lady, working itself is not acceptable. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Hedda Gabler- structure of the play and the major characters

    Elvsted, and Eilert L�vborg. Thea is forever loyal to L�vborg as she runs away from home to be with him. On the other hand, even though the readers know that Hedda and L�vborg share an intense relationship, she betrays him and leads him to his suicide. Moreover, Hedda betrays Mrs.

  2. Lord of the Flies Critical Analysis

    These ideas are very crucial in creating a society in which they can survive and still be rescued. Jack, however, is egocentric and lustful for blood. His opposing views on how to run the group of boys is based on his selfish need to hunt and kill.

  1. Wonderful Fool (Susaku Endo) Quote Analysis in Terms of Aspects of Tokyo and Japan

    Quote Analysis "The Couillon attracted a peculiar breed of young Japanese enamored of all things French. Just as the young 'Russians' of Tokyo, dressed as they imagined Russian workers dressed, gathered together at certain bars to sing Russian folk songs, so these Francophiles flocked to coffee shops like the Couillon,

  2. In Pygmalion, Shaw portrays a society in translation, in which progressive notions of femininity ...

    "Now you have made a lady of me, I'm not fit to sell anything else. I wish you'd left me where you found me". This indicates that higher-class woman have no place in the society as they cannot afford their own costs.

  1. The Comparison of the Position of Women in Girl, by Jamaica Kincaid, and The ...

    Moreover, let us see what happens at the very end of the story, "now the child lived in her grandmother's house; she prospered"(162). The story is predicting the happening of another tragedy: the girl is going to become old,

  2. The play Fireflies, written by Suzue Toshiro and directed by Ricardo G. Abad, was ...

    Hayakawa's sexual pursuit of Tomoyo despite his being a married man is one of the main conflicts of Fireflies. Hayakawa is taking advantage of the frail and shaky relationship between Tomoyo and Nakagawa. In other words, knowing that Tomoyo's connection with Nakagawa was faltering, Hayakawa saw this as an opportunity to establish his own connection with Tomoyo.

  1. Commentary on The Custody of the Pumpkin By P. G. Wodehouse

    money and stature; he is a very materialistic person who craves success of any form. Freddie is the son of Lord Emsworth. He is a pitiable character portrayed as neglected and somewhat rebellious. The story made me feel bad for Freddie because it simply disgusted me to read about a father so desperate to rid himself of his own child.

  2. Reflections on "Miss Julie" in a cultural context

    She was probably in pain and she wasn?t sure of what she was doing therefore took advantage of any opportunity that came along. As she was young she was never allowed to play or socialize with servants due to her social status the time this play was written mistresses from the high class were not allowed to socialize with servants.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work