• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Money and Happiness:Neither in de Maupassants The Necklace, nor in Ibsens A Dolls House, did money bring happiness to people. Even less can it be said about Dostoevskys Crime and Punishment.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Ian Mikhailov Professor Fischer English 102 29 September, 2008 Money and Happiness: A Philosophical View Through Works of Literature. People do love money. Wealth, in the eyes of the great majority, is the most direct and understandable measure of success. As success in life appears to most, it is closely related to one's feeling of happiness; the common tendency is to measure happiness in terms of financial success. But is it justified? Does money really bring happiness? Although everyone may have their own point of view, this essay will make an attempt to look at this subject as it is developed in the works of literature. While it may not give a clear answer, artistic interpretation provides a great opportunity for investigation and conclusions on the subject. Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Guy de Maupassant's The Necklace both approach the subject from a different angle. Another angle can be seen in Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. Some people love money because they do not have it. In Guy de Maupassant's The Necklace, Mathilde "had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that, "she felt made for that" (de Maupassant 130). The craving for money, or at least for the appearance of its possession, led Mathilde to borrow an expensive necklace from a wealthy friend to show it at the ball given by the Minister of Public Instruction. ...read more.

Middle

For Mathilde, ten years of hard work and the loss of her youth was the price for a moment of enjoyment in front of a crowd of strangers. Perhaps her true happiness could have being found much closer - in her family, or her daily life. Readers can only hope she was able to find it in the end. Money played a very different role for Nora in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House. Perceived by many, including her own husband, as a "spendthrift", Nora, the main character of the play, needed money to pay the debt she made to save her husband's life. She did not seem to need money to be happy, but she needed it to reestablish herself in her own eyes, to gain confidence in life. And that, of course, would be happiness for her. She was hoping to let her husband know of her sacrifice one day, as Nora confesses to her former friend, Kristine: "...some day, perhaps... in many years time, when I'm no longer as pretty as I am now...Then it might be a good thing to have something in reserve" (Ibsen 821). But the situation takes a different turn- when blackmailed by the person who loaned Nora money leads to a painful resolution, Nora was deeply hurt by her husband's reaction; she feels she has no other choice but to leave, telling him: "What I mean is: I passed out of Daddy's hands into yours. ...read more.

Conclusion

It seems that in the end it was love that made him happy, not money. Realization of happiness came to both Raskolnikov and Sonya suddenly; here is how it was revealed in the final scene of the book: "How it happened he did not know. But all at once something seemed to seize him and fling him at her feet. He wept and threw his arms round her knees. For the first instant she was terribly frightened and she turned pale. She jumped up and looked at him trembling. But at the same moment she understood, and a light of infinite happiness came into her eyes. She knew and had no doubt that he loved her beyond everything and that at last the moment had come" (Dostoevsky 504). Neither in de Maupassant's The Necklace, nor in Ibsen's A Doll's House, did money bring happiness to people. Even less can it be said about Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. Yet is it fair to say that its presence in human life completely destructive? Of course it would not be true. However, it is not money itself that make people happy or sad; it is people's attitude towards it, and their attitude towards life itself. It wasn't the lack of money that troubled Mathilde, Nora, or Raskolnikov, it is the lack of recognition and the lack of substance in their lives. True happiness is not in financial wealth, it is inside a human heart. Everyone can find it; people just have to know how to look. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Contrasting the straight forward realist drama style of "A Doll's House" by Henrik Ibsen ...

    but she only feels the wrongness of all her previous life and that is why decides to leave her husband and her children in order to become a personality. She admitsthat she is only a blank piece of paper, that she does not know anything about religion, except what a

  2. Diary entry from Torvald from Ibsens A Dolls House.

    And so she decides to leave me, declaring that she must "make sense of herself and everything around her." She walked out, slamming the door behind her." She had always said that she had been waiting all these years for me to do something glorious, like how she did for

  1. A comparison of two female heroes: Nora in Ibsens A Dolls House and Antigone ...

    Another difference between the two women is the path which they take in order to make their statement against the laws of the state.

  2. Analysis of Women's Position in "A dolls house" and " Uncle Vanya".

    Nora's believes that her love for her husband is what propelled her to sign her father's name and pass it off as his own. Nora's motive is to save her husband's life and keeping it secret is to save him from pain and humiliation.

  1. To what extent does Guy de Maupassant show sympathy for Madame Loisel in 'The ...

    Maupassant explicitly states that she cannot buy any better clothes because her parents could not afford it. This makes the readers feel sympathetic towards her as the ?pretty, delightful girl? who is a victim of Fate, something that she herself cannot control.

  2. A Glorious Morning, Comrade contains humour, yet You Are Now Entering The Human Heart ...

    Their mind may be still active. This might be why Mr Pitt-Rimmer said, ?I have my life?. The difference in attitude towards old people is reinforced by the characters. Mr. Pitt Rimmer is a very cunning person, which is shown through his plans of escape. In the story, he is always checking the time, which shows that his mind is still working.

  1. In No Sugar, by Aboriginal playwright Jack Davis. The British colonizers featured in the ...

    Which even now day?s aboriginals aren?t completely equal to whites. As it is stereotyped for men to have power over women and in this case white people to have power over aboriginals. The treatment of women in the Noongar community is menacing to the viewers.

  2. Feminist Perspective on the Role of Lady Madeline in Fall of the House of ...

    Women in Victorian Society Understanding the circumstances behind the treatment and portrayal of Madeline also demands an understanding of how women were expected to act, especially as reflected in nineteenth century literature.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work