• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Money and Happiness:Neither in de Maupassants The Necklace, nor in Ibsens A Dolls House, did money bring happiness to people. Even less can it be said about Dostoevskys Crime and Punishment.

Extracts from this document...


Ian Mikhailov Professor Fischer English 102 29 September, 2008 Money and Happiness: A Philosophical View Through Works of Literature. People do love money. Wealth, in the eyes of the great majority, is the most direct and understandable measure of success. As success in life appears to most, it is closely related to one's feeling of happiness; the common tendency is to measure happiness in terms of financial success. But is it justified? Does money really bring happiness? Although everyone may have their own point of view, this essay will make an attempt to look at this subject as it is developed in the works of literature. While it may not give a clear answer, artistic interpretation provides a great opportunity for investigation and conclusions on the subject. Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House and Guy de Maupassant's The Necklace both approach the subject from a different angle. Another angle can be seen in Fyodor Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. Some people love money because they do not have it. In Guy de Maupassant's The Necklace, Mathilde "had no dresses, no jewels, nothing. And she loved nothing but that, "she felt made for that" (de Maupassant 130). The craving for money, or at least for the appearance of its possession, led Mathilde to borrow an expensive necklace from a wealthy friend to show it at the ball given by the Minister of Public Instruction. ...read more.


For Mathilde, ten years of hard work and the loss of her youth was the price for a moment of enjoyment in front of a crowd of strangers. Perhaps her true happiness could have being found much closer - in her family, or her daily life. Readers can only hope she was able to find it in the end. Money played a very different role for Nora in Henrik Ibsen's A Doll's House. Perceived by many, including her own husband, as a "spendthrift", Nora, the main character of the play, needed money to pay the debt she made to save her husband's life. She did not seem to need money to be happy, but she needed it to reestablish herself in her own eyes, to gain confidence in life. And that, of course, would be happiness for her. She was hoping to let her husband know of her sacrifice one day, as Nora confesses to her former friend, Kristine: "...some day, perhaps... in many years time, when I'm no longer as pretty as I am now...Then it might be a good thing to have something in reserve" (Ibsen 821). But the situation takes a different turn- when blackmailed by the person who loaned Nora money leads to a painful resolution, Nora was deeply hurt by her husband's reaction; she feels she has no other choice but to leave, telling him: "What I mean is: I passed out of Daddy's hands into yours. ...read more.


It seems that in the end it was love that made him happy, not money. Realization of happiness came to both Raskolnikov and Sonya suddenly; here is how it was revealed in the final scene of the book: "How it happened he did not know. But all at once something seemed to seize him and fling him at her feet. He wept and threw his arms round her knees. For the first instant she was terribly frightened and she turned pale. She jumped up and looked at him trembling. But at the same moment she understood, and a light of infinite happiness came into her eyes. She knew and had no doubt that he loved her beyond everything and that at last the moment had come" (Dostoevsky 504). Neither in de Maupassant's The Necklace, nor in Ibsen's A Doll's House, did money bring happiness to people. Even less can it be said about Dostoevsky's Crime and Punishment. Yet is it fair to say that its presence in human life completely destructive? Of course it would not be true. However, it is not money itself that make people happy or sad; it is people's attitude towards it, and their attitude towards life itself. It wasn't the lack of money that troubled Mathilde, Nora, or Raskolnikov, it is the lack of recognition and the lack of substance in their lives. True happiness is not in financial wealth, it is inside a human heart. Everyone can find it; people just have to know how to look. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Diary entry from Torvald from Ibsens A Dolls House.

    And so she decides to leave me, declaring that she must "make sense of herself and everything around her." She walked out, slamming the door behind her." She had always said that she had been waiting all these years for me to do something glorious, like how she did for

  2. Explore the ways in which de Maupassant presents Mathilde Loisel as a character who ...

    Described to be the type of woman who only demands more and and doesn't treasure what she has in front of her, Mathilde always imagines herself of the prettiest woman who deserves the best among all, and 'would have liked so much to please, to be envied, to be charming, to be sought after.'

  1. Discuss how Ibsen has shaped your response to the issues raised in A Dolls ...

    This is relevant to any women in any time era. The idea of status is reinforced through the use of the personal pronoun "what good is that to me...they'll think I knew...that I was part of it". This also indicates his status is of paramount importance in his life, and

  2. Feminist Perspective on the Role of Lady Madeline in Fall of the House of ...

    The nature of their illnesses also reflect the gender roles of the era. While Roderick?s illness amplifies his senses, Madeline?s disease, described as ?a settle apathy, a gradual wasting away of the person?, dampens hers, reducing her into an ?barely-there?, almost ghostly, individual.

  1. Family Values in Siddhartha by Hesse and A Doll's House by Ibsen

    They have known each other for a long time and since earlier on Dr. Rank has had feelings for Nora but has never had to nerve to tell her. Nora views Dr. Rank?s life to be a squander and she takes him as a lesson in order to improve her life and not repeating the same mistakes.

  2. How does Browning bring vividly to life the men and their relationships in Porphyrias ...

    And so, throughout the entire poem and through the twist at the end a vivid character is created. My Last Duchess is a poem that is loosely based on historical events involving Alfonso, the Duke of Ferrara, who lived in the 16th century.

  1. Moods, colors and people of the deep blue sea are portrayed in The Sound ...

    ?Aye, how i tremble for him,lest some blow befall hima t men?s hands or on the sea!?(l.874,b.IV) 83. ?No crewmen or companions to pull him on the broad back of the sea.(l.19,b.V) 84. ?And now murder is hatched on the high sea against his son, who sought news of his father in the holy lands of Pylos and Lakedaimon.?(l.20,b.V)

  2. Analyse the Philosophic Justification of Raskolnikov's Actions in "Crime and Punishment".

    I mean who isn?t familiar with the unorthodox Robin Hood tactic of distribution of wealth. But considering killing as the only resort? That is too intense. All the other alternatives may have imposed lesser pain in comparison to the choice suggested by Raskolnikov.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work