• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Portrayal of colonisers and the colonised in Joseph Conrads Heart of Darkness

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Portrayal of colonisers and the colonised in Joseph Conrad's Heart of Darkness Joseph Conrad's novella Heart of Darkness was published 1902, after first being a three-part series in magazines. This book is one of the most influential books in world literature, it has made a huge impact on other authors and some of them have even written a whole book about this book. For example the Swedish author Olof Lagercrantz has written a whole book "F�rd med M�rkrets Hj�rta" (eng: "Walk with Heart of Darkness"), where he analyses Conrad's work. The book has also been made in to a movie (Heart of Darkness), and inspired a making of another film, Apocalypse Now. The book is about colonisation and can be refer to any colonisation at any time. During the entire book Marlowe, the main character, is retelling the story. In short, the book is about how far the human can go for money and power and also how easily a human being can forget what is right and what is wrong when he is put in unfamiliar environment. In the beginning of the book a story is being told about a Danish man who got killed by the natives after he had attacked them. ...read more.

Middle

While the black man is being portrayed as far away from amazing as possible. He his being described as if he has done something terrible and that he is pretty much worthless. Marlowe also describes the colonised man as if he could see every rib in his body, compared to the white man as which he describes as having a big white hand. My point is that Marlowe didn't have to mention that his hand was big, he could have said "...parasol held in a white hand". But I think "big" has a purpose in this context, that he really wants to mark the big difference between the colonised and the coloniser. Not just that the white people had more power, but also that they look so different and that they lived a wealthy life in the colony with good food and drinks. Meanwhile the colonised, whose ribs you could even see, almost were starving to death. One strong scene in the book is when the coloniser blamed a black man for starting a fire, as punishment they beat him so hard that he almost died and then they left him alone in a corner. Later the white man discussed the incident with Marlowe and the white man says "Serve him right...That's the only way. ...read more.

Conclusion

But we do know that the story Marlow is telling is about an unnamed European colony in Africa. Marlowe describes the Thames as is has been one of the darkest places on the earth. In the book we also being located somewhere that really sounds as the Congo River in Africa. Then we can relate Thames as the Congo River, but we can also make parallels between London and Congo. The point is that the white people treat the black people just as bad as the Romans treated them. Which is a bit of a paradox. So what is Conrad trying to say about the title "Heart of Darkness"? Is he trying to make a point how horrible the colonisation really where for everyone, not just the natives. Or is he trying to show how the dark people literally were pushed down by the white people, wanting to make it even clearer that they hadn't done anything wrong and showing how helpless they were? Maybe his point is to show us the darkness in the white peoples heart? Conrad is perhaps talking about the geographical darkness? That the jungle is one of the darkest place, for instance that the river is one of the darkest places in the book. Because the river is the reason why the black people are there, without the river they wouldn't have anything to do- no river-no trading. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Response to the question

Overall the student has grasped the question to an intermediate level, and sets about making some discerning points on the literary and descriptive techniques that differentiate the coloniser and the colonised in Heart of Darkness. When we reach the paragraphs ...

Read full review

Response to the question

Overall the student has grasped the question to an intermediate level, and sets about making some discerning points on the literary and descriptive techniques that differentiate the coloniser and the colonised in Heart of Darkness. When we reach the paragraphs where the larger-than-life appearance and corporeal power of the white man is commented upon, there seems a particularly apt moment to carry this disparity Conrad chooses to construct into a deeper level of analysis. For instance, what does emphasising these physical differences function towards on a larger scale? There is further context that can be brought in here with regards to the underlying racial anxieties, such as Western stereotypes of the "hot-blooded" or "hyper-masculine/quasi-bestial" black man, which renders their malnourishment at the hands of the coloniser as a form of corporeal and psychological control. The essay then goes on to focus mostly on the moral ambiguities of colonisation which Conrad constructs largely through the character of Kurtz. The student identifies and comments upon Kurtz's cold pragmatism and disillusionment, but if this observation had been better linked to the interesting parallels later drawn between the home nation and the colony (the Thames & the Congo River), this would have demonstrated sensitivity to the other facet of this question: how is their portrayal similar too? How does this alter or problematise the colonised-coloniser relationship when the enterprise of colonisation tangles the two in ways the white man would rather keep distinct and seperate?

Level of analysis

There is a decent set-up here, in terms of the points the student chooses to discuss, for a firm level of analysis to then follow. However, this doesn't quite come about due to the numerous times the student chooses to tie their points to a rudimentary level of explanation, leaving many things unsaid except inasmuch to acknowledge them as "a given". Sentences such as these should in general be avoided: "this scene says pretty much everything...", "this is a bit of a paradox" or "this statement makes it clear". They aren't analyses in themselves. I am not saying state the obvious constantly, but if they are to form the basis of deeper analysis they need to be fully articulated then built upon - not considered ends in themselves and abandoned. The student makes a point successfully, provides sound proof, then considers these sufficient in themselves when in fact there is a third stage to work through: explain. Point, proof, explain. The conclusion makes some good points but needs to make them more assertively. They are posed as tentative rhetorical questions instead, which undermine the argument when it should be most clear and forceful. Also, except at undergraduate level and beyond, it is usually not advisable to bring up new points of argument or new examples in the conclusion. The final sentence opens up a whole new vista in terms of geographical spaces of darkness, climate and its psychological and economic effects. As the student's area of analysis throughout the essay focuses more on physical and moral facets of the colonised/coloniser relationship, it is better for their argument's sake not to digress in the very last moment.

Quality of writing

At no point does the quality of the writing hinder the reader's understanding, but it is largely stylistic and formal awkwardness that undermines this piece all throughout. There are careless mistakes with tenses, such as "they didn't even considered..." which can easily be caught with another round of proofreading on the student's part before submission. Due to the rather conversational instead of academic tone with which this has been written, there are a serious amount of incomplete, badly formed sentences which can either be connected to the previous or following sentence with the appropriate punctuation, or seperated altogether in order to make grammatical sense. For instance, it is really difficult to read something like this: "That the jungle is one of the darkest place, for instance that the river is one of the darkest places in the book." These run-on observations prevent the flow of the argument and a coherent style from being sustained. It makes a huge contribution to an essay to get this right; for instance, simply restructuring that sentence to say "Conrad may also be talking about geographical darkness here, for he emphasises the physical darkness of both river and jungle repeatedly throughout the book", would explain the student's point not only more clearly but more succinctly too. Overall, good close reading and observations, but they need to be a) analysed more thoroughly and b) expressed accurately, both in syntax and style.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by fadingwinters 08/08/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Nadine Gordimer Comrades commentary. The following extract is from the collection of short stories ...

    This is illustrated through the portrayal of barriers, "He says Ekskuus? And she realises he doesn't understand English.", resulting from the Apartheid system and cultural differences. There is also a symbolic significance in numbers as there is only one white woman trying to help and feed all the four Black

  2. Literary Analysis for "Heidi With Blue Hair".

    Also, the poet uses the word "twittered" which is normally used to describe birds to describe the teachers, giving the impression that the teachers' words are ridiculous and show helplessness. This also shows her criticism towards the school system's ineffectuality.

  1. The Monkeys Paw by W.W Jacobs and the Tell Tale Heart written by Edgar ...

    In the "Tell Tale Heart" we see that the old man senses someone in the room, however when he does realize, he lets out a "groan of mortal terror." This use of emotive language helps create suspense and tension as the reader is also drawn into the threatening atmosphere expecting something terrible to happen.

  2. Catcher in the Rye written task + Rationale. To be able to sound ...

    the shoes of a ten year old girl, while using colloquial expressions to convey the idea of intimacy, which is an important characteristic of a diary. Also, I referred to the content of the book in order to be convincing, showing the same events that occur in the book but under the perspective of Holden's sister.

  1. Analysis of "The verger" by William Somerset Maugham. (Text of story in Vietnamese).

    - Albert Edward is very lucky, because if he couldn?t read or write, he couldn?t have been long at school and so it was a bit of luck, that he could make his shops run, but he has probably a certain talent.

  2. Broken Transformers is written by Bi Shumin in 1992, who is one of the ...

    The father is very angry when he knows they have to compensate for the expensive toy. He explodes to his wife ?It?s your fault for spoiling him.? (P.69) He thinks buying a toy to his son is fault. It makes the mother has not enough money to buy a wool hat for insulating her hair, moreover loses money for compensation.

  1. The supremacy of fright in The Tiger by S. Rajaratnam.

    In an argument between Fatima and her mother, Fatima tries to make her mother understand the tiger is harmless because ?the tiger was not more than twenty meters away and could have sprung at me easily? but it didn?t.? (3)

  2. Who is to blame for the death of Dido in Virgil's Aeneid?

    This description implies that this love is dangerous and perhaps even fatal, and this is unfortunately proved later in Book IV. However, what is key about this wound is the phrase that accompanies it, ?At regina graui iamdudum saucia cura / uulnus alit uenis et caeco carpitur igni.? Translating as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work