Reflective statement. Throughout this oral, the concept of ideology displayed by Camus was portrayed through an impartial and insightful point of view.

This is not to say that Camus’s ideology is wrong or immoral, just that the certainty and specific nature of it is somewhat dubious. I think that this statement is reinforced with the mentioning of Camus lack of faith in religion and his concrete belief of justice and what he deems to be equality. Due to Camus “deep-seated attitude against religion”, the question of why he joined the communist party still remains after he expressed his belief that “Communism is nothing if not a religion”. Since he was so opposed to the idea of conforming to a religious practice, the notion of joining a political party contradicts his morals entirely. This is also reflected in Camus’s expectations of the government within France, which he expressed by strongly and publically opposing totalitarianism and its many forms. This was considered significantly by the public which leads to the following issue; do Camus’s beliefs in his own diverse ideology entail a principle of an explicit system of thought? Are his morals and values merely a distorted view of society’s desires?

Camus’s ideology contains some considerable ideas, indicating to us as the readers that we shouldn’t conform to the dominant notion of socialization, but instead, we should take into account that the other opposing views. These different opinions can combine to produce a comprehensive vision, and a dissimilar outlook on the objectivity of our society.