• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Shakespeare, Richard II: analysis of Richard as a king

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Shakespeare, Richard II: analysis of Richard as a king In Shakespeare?s Richard II, the king Richard?s identity can be characterized by several major subjects. Firstly, at the very beginning of the play, he gives a good image of him and seems sure of himself. But our esteem of him will quickly decline, and even during the first scene of the play. Indeed, Bullingbrook clearly states that Richard planned Gloucester?s death : ?Further I say, and further will maintain [?] That he did plot the Duke of Gloucester?s death?, which informs us of a family betrayal right from the beginning. So we can say that conflicts in this play aren?t just political, they?re family matters as well. Then, still in the first scene, when Richard says ?Forget, forgive, conclude and be agreed. ...read more.

Middle

Here we recognize the logic of the king who says he gets what he wants because he is the king, but who also is disorganized, non-autonomous and non-domineering. Secondly, he?s strongly convinced that he has been chosen by God to be king and that he can do whatever he wants, since he doesn?t have to answer to anyone but to God. This political theory of believing God has specifically chosen him to be king of England is sometimes called the ?divine right of kings?. Besides, considering and trusting this belief will be one of the reasons of his downfall, because since he thinks he?s God?s representative on earth, he assumes that no man can replace him on the throne and therefore that he doesn?t have to bother defending himself and his status. ...read more.

Conclusion

Finally, in the last scene of act I, Richard?s callous remarks about Gaunt?s illness indicate his lack of respect for anyone besides himself, including the elders of his own family. This self-centeredness will as well help and lead to his downfall. Besides, the fact that Richard chooses to ignore the advice of his dying uncle in act II scene 1 is a sign of his foolishness. And by the time this scene closes, we have learned of the imminent invasion of England by Bullingbrook?s forces ; a piece of information which, with what we already know about his popularity and Richard?s merited unpopularity with the English commoners, implies already the inevitable outcome : Richard?s deposition and defeat at the hands of Bullingbrook. To conclude, Richard in act I and act II scene 1 shows right from the first scene how improper and wrong he is, through all of his inappropriate words, speeches, manners, decisions and choices. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our International Baccalaureate World Literature section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related International Baccalaureate World Literature essays

  1. Hamlet Act II Questions and Answers

    In this soliloquy, Hamlet compares himself with the First Player. Explain the IRONY that Hamlet sees in the comparison. Hamlet compares himself to the First Player in the soliloquy ending Act II. The actor gave a deeply emotional display while reciting the speech about Queen Hecuba: "That from her working

  2. The Course of Justice . The Role of Women in William ...

    Unfortunately, this sane view of the villain does not last long after a few faltering words drop from Richards's eloquent lips and a marriage date is set. For a while, hope is lost that Anne is going to return to her intelligent demeanor, however, soon after her husband's coronation, the truth is revealed to her anew.

  1. Richard II, Shakespeare: analysis of act 2, scene 1

    Language and communication is as well an important aspect here. After Gaunt delivered his long speech telling Richard how he?s ruining England and then dies, Northumberland says about him that ?His tongue is now a stringless instrument. Words, life and all old Lancaster hath spent.? (lines 149,150).

  2. To what extent was President Richard Nixon responsible in the Watergate scandal in 1972-1974?

    office after hours by the police who were alerted by security. The Watergate Scandal has been one of the most polemic unraveling the reasons for the involvement of Richard Nixon, who knew about his re-elect committee?s involvement in the bugging and breaking into the DNC.

  1. Lord of the Flies Summary and Analysis of Chapters 7,8,9 and 10

    . . Fancy thinking the Beast was something you could hunt and kill!" * "You knew, didn't you? I'm part of you? Close, close, close! I'm the reason why it's no go? Why things are what they are?" * These words confirm Simon's theory that the beast is the boys themselves.

  2. Symbolism/Imagery/Allegory in King Lear

    The Fool declares man torn into pieces by gods. Gloucester also cries, ?As flies to wanton boys, are we to gods; they kill us for their sport?. The sense of bodily torture continues to the end. Lear tells Cordelia that he is bound ?Upon a wheel of fire that my own tears do scald like molten lead?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work