Stereotyping in Literature - 4 modern American novels concerned with ethnic identity.

Authors Avatar

Page |

The idea of stereotyping in literature is akin in many ways to social and developmental psychology. The stereotypes thus take on one of two primary characteristics for the audience. Either they epitomize the relationship the reader takes with the character, or they become anti-characters, caricatures and phantoms of the stereotype that shows how ridiculous the idea of the stereotype is in the first place. The surprising truth, however, becomes the ease at which most modern audiences are quickly able to pick out these stereotypes and, with very little thought, identify with either the protagonist or completely reject the stereotype and their own buy-in to this socio-political relationship.

Most cultural learning arises from a combination of culture combined with historical truths passed down due to a variety of reasons (political, economic, etc.). As humans, we tend to learn behaviors and ideas based on our contact with family and the environment. On constructivist theory says that it is, in fact, our environment that shapes the way we think of self, of others, and the way we allow preconceptions of others to form reality – and this happens early in childhood and only becomes more solidified as we age (Myers).

In general, a stereotype is a popular belief about a group, person, or culture that may or may not be true, but has come to hold certain cultural meanings from one group to the next. Essentially, they are standardized and rather simplistic conceptions of groups that are often based on prior assumptions. The sociological dynamics about stereotyping are based on the concepts of groups and group norms – those who are in-groups and those who are out-groups. In groups are those who follow cultural norms, associate or aspire.  Through evolution, humans have evolved to be social animals. They tend to perform better in groups, prefer group activities, and even the process of becoming civilized was one of group cooperation. There are, of course numerous ways to organize groups, a number of templates that may be appropriate for certain situations, etc., and a number of possibilities in which to collaborate. Norms within a group are usually seen as internal rules that the group members tend to follow so that the group itself will be more efficient. These norms set up leadership roles, ways of approaching each other and outsiders, how problems are solved, and even the manner in which work and play occur. Oftentimes, these norms are based not on written dogma, but culture and tradition. Thus, they often morph into stereotypes about the “other” or the outsider without giving adequate thought to truth or new experience (McGarty, Yzerbyt and Spears).

How, then, do we more clearly understand the manner in which literature echoes culture, particularly when dealing with stereotypes? If we accept the argument that literature is reflective of society – both in representations and commentary, then it makes sense that authors would utilize stereotypes that have some meaning to the intended audience. This meaning, of course, may be cynical in nature, it may cause outrage, and it may even shorten explanations because of the “popularity” of the stereotype. But, what often happens is really one of two things: the stereotype may become so exaggerated as to ridicule the very nature of the intended character; or the stereotype may become so integrated that the characterization is simply taken for granted (Meyer)

Join now!

Our examination of stereotypes will consist of looking at the topic of bias, prejudice and inate stereotyping in four novels:

(See also: Korte)

Each work addresses a specific kind of stereotyping and prejudice, however all are based on ethnicity – Native American, African American, East Indian and Chinese American. All expressed dismay at being the “other,” being seen as an outsider through no fault of their own, being feared by mainstream white Americans, yet no matter what, not being able to become what they saw as the “ideal,” that really doesn’t exist. Furthermore, each work shows in some way that ...

This is a preview of the whole essay