The White Indian: Mary Jemison in Two Worlds. The date was November 1823 when Mary was about 80 years old when she first met with Seaver to orally tell her story, which took over the course of three days.

Authors Avatar

Laura Solomon

                                                                        History 2010G

                                                                        9/20/09

                The White Indian: Mary Jemison in Two Worlds

        For some strange reason after reading the editors introduction to the Narrative of Mrs. Mary Jemison, It reminded me of the beginning of the Titanic. I remember being a little girl watching one hundred year old Rose walk in to a salvage ship to tell her story, I thought it was so cool, having history come to life by having it told by someone who lived it. I didn’t have grandparents going up, so I never got to experience sitting on a grandpa’s lap telling me war story’s or a grandma pitch my cheeks and talk about her old loves stories. So when I started reading the introduction I was hooked. Although it’s hard to tell if what your hearing is really the truth, or if those who are getting the story told to are just interested for their own gain or to truly get the story out. In the Titanic the men who want to hear Rose’s story are mainly interested in what happened to her blue diamond necklace, during the disaster. It’s true that many people use others for their own gain but in this narrative I believe Seaver was truly interested, for the story reads not like fiction but Fact. Niamias even chooses to return to the original narrative by Seaver because the ones after him may have been tweaked so she too, even being an American Women’s History professor, had the best interest while retelling Mary’s story.

        The date was November 1823 when Mary was about 80 years old when she first met with Seaver to orally tell her story, which took over the course of three days. Many of those who are reputable didn’t want her to tell her story because they were embarrassed about what they did in the past, and her story documents in detail and fact all they things they did. Had she not tell her story, no one would know the historical truth, which was told by Mary Jemison. Seaver says her hair was a “light chestnut brown” (page 56), which was told later it was actually blonde. Seavers story is modernized to what it is now by June Namias in 1992 after collecting more accurate information giving a more scholarly analysis. This goes to show how we can’t always believe everything we hear, for along with history’s facts its also based off of peoples point of view. I found it vey interesting that Seavers notes have not survived and we do not know what questions he asked her. For after the story was published, it got a wide audience but first attracted historians and later even turned into many children’s book versions. This narrative stands out among all captivity tales, not only because of how it shows how she reacted, interacted and survived her whole life under captivity. It is because of the interest and curiosity of others who have researched and changed and added to her story, that has given it so much more history and popularity.

Join now!

        June Namias the editor of Seavers Narrative was an American Women’s History professor. Her editing of the story makes me think if she was truly editing it to give us the facts or to get her name out by editing a captivity story about a woman, given her occupation. I believe she had the best interest while editing her story, because she returned to the original narrative by Seaver. She did this because the one that fallowed his may have been tweaked. I think its easy for people to accuse others of using individuals for their own gain but when ...

This is a preview of the whole essay