WOrld Lit Essay- A man for all seansons and The crucible

first play starts with a thud and continues to go in a flow with including more controversies and traps. The play “ a man for all seasons “ starts with Thomas more explaining about his novel “utopia “ , which explains about a perfect world where everything is perfect . etc. but as we go through the play we come across the controversies being dealt in the play , the basic principle of letting with values on morals Is being talked about which shows the seriousness of the play , but towards the end the outcome seen is waste the play ends with the main male protagonist being hanged and the fate of all other characters .the character “Thomas more” continues to stick to his morals and adamant to prove his saying and follow the path of righteous and correctness .A similar story is seen in the play “the crucible”, the play starts with the girls acting weirdly and getting nude in the jungle and dancing. The play is based on old beliefs and written in a different age as compared to the previous play. The play basically deals with witchcraft and how a single conspirator decides the bad fate of many innocent people. The play also has an outcome which is also in a form of a waste , the main male protagonist “john proctor” is hanged with many other innocent people and hence the play comes to an end giving no result and lost hopes , the judiciary gives a decision which is not appropriate failing to understand the  main problem being dealt .the play also deals about the character “john proctor” trying to save his name and later ends up giving away his life . Waste is present in both the plays in a different manner but still it can be said to be similar as the outcome is not fruitful and vague . We can also say that even in the play Idipus which is about a boy who deals with his fate and works with bravery , earns a lot of fame and even respect . but at the end he ends up walking away from the kingdom with two fences poked in his eyes . the play shows the extreme level of falls thinking in the mind of the play , the king sends of his offspring to a jungle and later his own son kills the king and sleeps with his mother . The controversies and plots going through are mesmerizing but at the end the result is again waste as nothing fruitful is obtained and the ill effects of the characters is seen . Looking at all the three plays we can say that waste is present in these plays but the question arises weather “waste” is used intentionally or is present without being inscribed in the play. The matter of the fact is that the play deals with a lot of  plots and goes through smoothly creating excitement in the mind of the reader hence the outcome needs to be mind blowing and should affect the reader so that he thinks over it again and again . Hence the end is generally in a form of waste making the reader think about the play intensely. Another question which we come across is that to what extent the waste is used. in the play , the crucible it is used to show the injustice faced by the innocent people creating a feeling of empathy and sympathy in the mind of reader towards the characters , similarly in the play “ a man for all seasons” the waste is inscribed in the play in such a manner that the reader tends to think about the moral values and  resentment for “Thomas more “ and him fighting alone for a right cause . looking at this we come to know that the effect on the audience due to the waste present is intense. The effect on the reader is different depending on the way the outcome is presented . as well as on the way the waste as a result is explained All the tree play have different themes , the first play “the crucible” deals with witchcraft as well as judiciary failure , whereas the second play deals with “ moral values and believing in righteous “ and the third play deals with  the “ill fate “ of a great person . Hence even though all of them are written in different ages , the final outcome is waste . we can also reason out the type of waste present and the intensity to which it is explained, for example “in the play “ Idipus” , the fate of the main character is shown with severe problems and exaggeration is  used .whereas in the play “ The crucible” , the play ends with the character dying and the conspirator cannot be seen in the last scenes , hence the waste is not explained or talked about for long .  Hence ,looking at this we can conclude that even if the ages and themes are different , most of the time the final outcome is waste .