Describe management style, culture and organisational structure and how they affect its performance and operation and help meat their objectives.
Describe management style, culture and organisational structure and how they affect its performance and operation and help meat their objectives.
The success of a business usually depends on the type of management style used. The style should make the employees work in the correct way to suit the objectives of the business and the type of management style chosen should make the business work sufficiently. A business also has to have the right culture to suit the way the businesses objectives are met. Culture combines the beliefs and values of the individuals and the extent to which they rely on the organisation's rules and procedures. An organisation structure is the way the business is set up. This includes lines of communication and span of control. Organisational charts help the business run effectively giving a visual picture of the organisation. Within each organisational structure there are different chains of command and span of control.
Management Styles
The Autocrat
The autocratic leader dominates team-members, using unilateralism to achieve a singular objective. This approach to leadership generally results in passive resistance from team-members and requires continual pressure and direction from the leader in order to get things done. Generally, an authoritarian approach is not a good way to get the best performance from a team.
There are, however, some instances where an autocratic style of leadership may not be inappropriate. Some situations may call for urgent action, and in these cases an autocratic style of leadership may be best. In addition, most people are familiar with autocratic leadership and therefore have less trouble adopting that style. Furthermore, in some situations, sub-ordinates may actually prefer an autocratic style.
The Laissez-Faire Manager
The Laissez-Faire manager exercises little control over his group, leaving them to sort out their roles and tackle their work, without participating in this process himself. In general, this approach leaves the team floundering with little direction or motivation.
Again, there are situations where the Laissez-Faire approach can be effective. The Laissez-Faire technique is usually only appropriate when leading a team of highly motivated and skilled people, who have produced excellent work in the past. Once a leader has established that his team is confident, capable and motivated, it is often best to step back and let them get on with the task, since interfering can generate resentment and detract from their effectiveness. By handing over ownership, a leader can empower his group to achieve their goals.
The success of a business usually depends on the type of management style used. The style should make the employees work in the correct way to suit the objectives of the business and the type of management style chosen should make the business work sufficiently. A business also has to have the right culture to suit the way the businesses objectives are met. Culture combines the beliefs and values of the individuals and the extent to which they rely on the organisation's rules and procedures. An organisation structure is the way the business is set up. This includes lines of communication and span of control. Organisational charts help the business run effectively giving a visual picture of the organisation. Within each organisational structure there are different chains of command and span of control.
Management Styles
The Autocrat
The autocratic leader dominates team-members, using unilateralism to achieve a singular objective. This approach to leadership generally results in passive resistance from team-members and requires continual pressure and direction from the leader in order to get things done. Generally, an authoritarian approach is not a good way to get the best performance from a team.
There are, however, some instances where an autocratic style of leadership may not be inappropriate. Some situations may call for urgent action, and in these cases an autocratic style of leadership may be best. In addition, most people are familiar with autocratic leadership and therefore have less trouble adopting that style. Furthermore, in some situations, sub-ordinates may actually prefer an autocratic style.
The Laissez-Faire Manager
The Laissez-Faire manager exercises little control over his group, leaving them to sort out their roles and tackle their work, without participating in this process himself. In general, this approach leaves the team floundering with little direction or motivation.
Again, there are situations where the Laissez-Faire approach can be effective. The Laissez-Faire technique is usually only appropriate when leading a team of highly motivated and skilled people, who have produced excellent work in the past. Once a leader has established that his team is confident, capable and motivated, it is often best to step back and let them get on with the task, since interfering can generate resentment and detract from their effectiveness. By handing over ownership, a leader can empower his group to achieve their goals.