• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22

: A quantitative study employed to find out whether interactive learining can enchance our memory recall process?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

DZX222 EXPERIMENTAL PROJECT TITLE: A quantitative study employed to find out whether interactive learining can enchance our memory recall process? ABSTRACT Open Universitystudents conducted a qualitative study as part of a psychology course requirement. A between-participants design was employed in order to explore the issue proposed by Craik and Lockhart, the levels of processing theory, which states that the retention of information in memory depends on how deeply it is processed when encoded. 60 participants individually carried out three conditions. The independent variable was ?the condition that the participant took part in`. The dependent variable was ?the score measured for the amount of correct placement of country names`. INTRODUCTION This qualitative study was employed to find out whether interactive learning can enchance our memory recall process. Previous studies proposed by Craik and Lockhart1[1], the levels of processing theory proposed that deeper processing leads to more permanent memory, Several studies have been conducted on methods to force deeper processing of new information and in the area of reading, it has been shown that teaching words in the context of paragraphs rather than in isolation leads to greater retention and increased fluency in the language. The levels of processing framework was presented 2[2] as an alternative to theories of memory that postulated separate stages for sensory, working and long-term memory. According to the levels of processing framework, stimulus information is processed at multiple levels simultaneously depending upon its characteristics. Furthermore, the "deeper"the processing, the more that will be remembered. For example, information that involves strong visual images or many associations with existing knowledge will be processed at a deeper level. The major proposition is that learners utilize different levels of elaboration as they process information. ...read more.

Middle

In other words participants doing conditions 2 and 3 would score more than participants doing condition 1. The results were based on the Independent Variable which was manipulated by the three conditions. The dependent Variable was the score measured for the amount of correct placements of country names. The results of the experiment are shown in Table1 below. Descriptives N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error 95% Confidence Interval for Mean Minimum Maximum Lower Bound Upper Bound 1,00 20 12,15 3,117 ,697 10,69 13,61 6 19 2,00 20 11,15 5,641 1,261 8,51 13,79 0 21 3,00 20 14,75 4,166 ,932 12,80 16,70 9 21 Total 60 12,68 4,616 ,596 11,49 13,88 0 21 Table1 The results in this table show the mean scores for each condition. The results were also analysed using ANOVA. Those results are shown in Table 2 below. ANOVA Sum of Squares df Mean Square F Sig. Between Groups 138,133 2 69,067 3,519 ,036 Within Groups 1118,850 57 19,629 Total 1256,983 59 Table2 ANOVA shows that the f ratio = F(2.57)=3.519, p=0.036. The effect size n2 = 138,133 equals 0.110. According to these 1256.983 results p value is less than 0.05, so the results are statistically significant. Based on these results it is possible to accept the experimental hypothesis and reject the null hypothesis. DISCUSSION As we have predicted, the results of this experiment showed that participants who did condition3 had actually got the highest mean score. In our predicitions we were hoping that our condition2, where participants were asked questions about the map they were studying would also produce the highest scores as those participants should have remeberd more according to the theories put forward by Craik and Lockhart. ...read more.

Conclusion

Do you understand what you have to do? Condition 3: In a moment I will place jigsaw pieces of Africa in front of you and a map of Africa I would like you to put the jigsaw pieces together by looking at the map. You will be given 5 minutes to do this task. You will then be required to perform a simple task based on what you have learnt from the map. You will be given 2 and a half minutes to do this task. Do you understand what you have to do? Debriefing: The memory experiment you have just undertaken is part of my on-line project I am conducting with the Open University. In my project I am studying how well information is processed and whether doing different tasks shows that there are different levels of processing information. Also no judgements will be made based on your performance, all results will be anonymous and will not be able to be traced back to you and if now after doing the task you want to withdraw, I will destroy your results. Thank you very much for your co-operation. APPENDIX 6 QUESTIONS FOR CONDITION2 (1) What is the capital of South Africa? JOHANNESBURG (2) Which is the biggest country in Africa? SUDAN (3) What is the capital of Zimbabwe? HARARE (4) Which country is bordered by Libya, Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon, Central African Republic and Sudan? CHAD (5) What is the capital of Egypt? CAIRO (6) Which is the smallest country? SWAZILAND (7) What is the capital of Ethiopia? ADDIS ABABA (8) What countries border Mali? (A) ALGERIA, MAURITANIA, SENEGAL, GUINEA, COTE D'IVOIRE, BURKINA FASO & NIGER. (9) What is the capital of Burkina Faso? OUAGADOUGOU (10) What countries border Zimbabwe? ZAMBIA, BOTSWANA, SOUTH AFRICA & MOZAMBIQUE 1[1] 1972 2[2] Craik and Lockhart 1972 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. memory recall for an eyewitness event

    The memory recall for central events was not significantly different between the Control and the Suggestibility group (t (1,18) = 1.342, p =0.196). However, memory for peripheral events was significantly different between the two Groups (t (1,18x) =3.973x, p =0.001).

  2. An Experiment on Memory and the Effect of Different Levels of Processing.

    A field experiment is less controlled than if it was carried out in a laboratory. However, as it uses the participant's natural environment, what it loses in control, it makes up for in ecological validity. The experiment used independent measures design because the nature of the experiment does not require nor enable the use of repeated measures.

  1. How reliable is Eyewitness testimony, and what can be done to improve it?

    It is suggested (Baldwin & Bedward, 1991) that all witness interviews are recorded, to eliminate the dangers of the interviewer summarizing when writing the final statement. Few are written contemporaneously, and contain added jargon, unreported information, inconsistencies and omissions which the defense can exploit when questioning the witness.

  2. Critically review the research and theories in one area of everyday memory

    Adrenaline associated with emotive events is thought to release glucose past the blood brain barrier, which is thought to be responsible for increased firing within the Hippocampus and Amygdala (Ibid.). However as FMs involve more than just emotion, other brain structures are thought to be activated in this way.

  1. The effects of music on word recall

    that how meaningful the words are to participants, the more likely they are to have a detrimental effect on word recall tasks. This may help to establish how the phonological loop responds to semantic input as opposed to information with which the participant feels no emotional attachment.

  2. LOP psychology

    20 4 3 2 Total 81 39 20 Analysis of results The results from this experiment showed that participants were able to recall more words from semantic questions than phonological or structural questions. The mean shows this. The mean number for semantic recall, 4.05, was significantly higher than that of

  1. Study carried out on whether students will recall of a narrative passage with greater ...

    The most familiar and most studied (Graesser et al., 1991) text structure is narrative text or stories. "Although there is no prevailing consensus on the definition of narrative text and some debate over the features of a story, narrative text depicts events, actions, emotions, or situations that people in a culture experience" (Graesser et al., 1991).

  2. Discuss theories of memory. Which do you find most convincing?

    the list have been rehearsed and have consequently been transferred to and retrieved from LTM. Recency would presumably occur because items are still current within STM and are recalled from there. Asymptote would occur because not enough time is available for rehearsal and storage in LTM and because STM only

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work