• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acquisition of Language: the Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky.

Extracts from this document...


A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IS THE DEBATE BETWEEN PIAGET AND CHOMSKY STILL HOLDS? Rafidah Aga Mohd Jaladin Department Of Educational Psychology & Counselling Faculty Of Education University Of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Abstract In language acquisition studies, the names Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky are not uncommon. They were known because they were the founders of language acquisition theories, which act as guidance for researchers to study language and language acquisition. Although these two theorists were the main contributors in the study of language, they had a different and contradictory viewpoint. Piaget emphasized on the role of cognitive development factors in language acquisition, whereas, Chomsky focused on the role of genetic endowment factors. This paper discusses the differences in Piaget's and Chomsky's approaches to language acquisition in an attempt to present a new perspective showing that each has a place. A special focus is given to their differences in opinions and approaches towards the study of syntax and semantics, which are the two important components of a language. Introduction How children acquire language is one of the key mysteries facing scientific enquiry into humans. ...read more.


Chomsky (1986) believed that TGG is the main constituent knowledge of language. TGG is defined as "an explicit description of the internalized rules of a language as they must have been mastered by an idealized speaker-hearer" (Sinclair-de-Zwart, 1969a, p.365). There are two major points in Chomsky's model of generative grammar. First, he asserted that there was an innate language acquisition device (LAD), which provides the basis for human linguistic competence. Chomsky proposed that the nature of LAD was like an innate "black box" which was capable of receiving linguistic input (the sentences of the language in which the child was growing up) and, from these, deriving universal grammatical rules (Garton, 1992). Once these universal grammatical rules are derived, LAD functions to yield a particular language through interaction with presented experience, that is, it helps to convert experience into a system of knowledge attained: knowledge of one (native language) or another (Chomsky, 1986). Second, he posited that each sentence had a surface structure (i.e., the actual arrangement of words that we hear or see), and a deep structure (i.e., the idea underlying the sentence) (Bohannon, 1993). ...read more.


Yet, correlation does not always infer causation (Bohannon, 1993). Conclusion In conclusion, it is hypothesized that the above discussion may help to resolve the issue on language acquisition, which has been debated since early 1970s. It could be argued that why Chomsky considered language and cognition (including intellectual character of the mind) as separate entities is because his approach to language acquisition is heavily based on the acquisition of syntax. There is substantial evidence that shows the syntactic component of a language is innate and species-specific but not its semantic counterpart (Curtiss, 1977, 1981, as cited in Bohannon, 1993). However, Piaget's approach seems to provide strong arguments in relation to semantics. Therefore, it is undeniable that Piaget viewed language and cognition as interrelated because he believed that the attainment of meanings relies heavily on the continuous interaction between children's hereditary structure and their environment. This provides some evidence that each theory has a place in language acquisition. Could it be that in reality the two approaches are not contradictory, as claimed by most people, but parallel in explanations since both try to explain the same thing but based on totally different grounds? This is yet another issue that needs to be resolved in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Cognition Development in Children

    It was interesting to see the correlation of these experiments to what we are learning in class. Out of the four subjects only one of the children have older siblings. This is where we saw the clustering. "Siblings are always competing for resources, with older siblings typically having the advantage

  2. Schizophrenia and related psychosis.

    describes it as the 'engine that drives learning in CBT' (p271) Application of CBT in psychiatric disorders requires each specific disorder to be conceptualise the within a CBT framework. Cognitive profile techniques are then applied to neutralise or reverse the distortions characteristic of the particular disorder.

  1. Describe the impairments typically observed in children with autism and compare the different cognitive ...

    the information of the marble's location which involves working memory; in addition they must inhibit a prepotent response therefore not revealing where the marble is. In atypical children developing EF has been linked with advancement in TOM. Russell,Mauthner, Sharpe, and Tidswell (1991)

  2. Does language determine the way we think?

    found that English speakers (whose language possesses the subjunctive) showed better comprehension of a counterfactual passage than Chinese speakers, possibly due to the added processing and memory burden of counterfactual reasoning in Chinese. However, Au (1984) questioned the reliability of these results as the Chinese translation of the counterfactual passage was written in unidiomatic Chinese, and at times the Chinese version was genuinely ambiguous rather than counterfactual.

  1. Eyewitness performance in Cognitive and Structured interviews.

    Interviewer Training The interviewers were all female research assistants[3] who received payment for the interviews conducted. All interviewers were university students in Psychology. There were three interviewers in each condition. The CI and SI groups were trained in two 4-hour sessions which began with an introductory lecture on the importance of the interview in psychological assessment and information gathering.

  2. Cognitive heuristic approaches to decision making

    Thus the experimental hypothesis is confirmed: people tend to generate reliably higher estimates for the '----ing' word fragment condition. DISCUSSION The results support the experimental hypothesis: people tend to generate reliably higher estimates for the '_ _ _ _ ing' word fragment than they would if they were exposed to the '_ _ _ _ _ n _' word fragment.

  1. Consider the Relationship Between Thought and Language, from Developmental, Evolutionary, and Neurop

    How then does one decide who is correct? It follows from the above that Bruner believes that cognitive development can be significantly speeded up by language training whereas for Piaget it would make no difference. Sonstroem (1966) and Bruner (1966)

  2. To what extent can biological investigations provide evidence to suggest language lateralisation correlates with ...

    appropriate syntax, revealing that the patients with schizophrenia had overall reduced comprehension accuracy compared to healthy participants. This trend in literature reflects the hypothesis that those with the disorder schizophrenia have a decreased language ability due to the lack of left hemisphere dominance present in healthy control subjects (Rachel et al.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work