• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acquisition of Language: the Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky.

Extracts from this document...


A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IS THE DEBATE BETWEEN PIAGET AND CHOMSKY STILL HOLDS? Rafidah Aga Mohd Jaladin Department Of Educational Psychology & Counselling Faculty Of Education University Of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Abstract In language acquisition studies, the names Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky are not uncommon. They were known because they were the founders of language acquisition theories, which act as guidance for researchers to study language and language acquisition. Although these two theorists were the main contributors in the study of language, they had a different and contradictory viewpoint. Piaget emphasized on the role of cognitive development factors in language acquisition, whereas, Chomsky focused on the role of genetic endowment factors. This paper discusses the differences in Piaget's and Chomsky's approaches to language acquisition in an attempt to present a new perspective showing that each has a place. A special focus is given to their differences in opinions and approaches towards the study of syntax and semantics, which are the two important components of a language. Introduction How children acquire language is one of the key mysteries facing scientific enquiry into humans. ...read more.


Chomsky (1986) believed that TGG is the main constituent knowledge of language. TGG is defined as "an explicit description of the internalized rules of a language as they must have been mastered by an idealized speaker-hearer" (Sinclair-de-Zwart, 1969a, p.365). There are two major points in Chomsky's model of generative grammar. First, he asserted that there was an innate language acquisition device (LAD), which provides the basis for human linguistic competence. Chomsky proposed that the nature of LAD was like an innate "black box" which was capable of receiving linguistic input (the sentences of the language in which the child was growing up) and, from these, deriving universal grammatical rules (Garton, 1992). Once these universal grammatical rules are derived, LAD functions to yield a particular language through interaction with presented experience, that is, it helps to convert experience into a system of knowledge attained: knowledge of one (native language) or another (Chomsky, 1986). Second, he posited that each sentence had a surface structure (i.e., the actual arrangement of words that we hear or see), and a deep structure (i.e., the idea underlying the sentence) (Bohannon, 1993). ...read more.


Yet, correlation does not always infer causation (Bohannon, 1993). Conclusion In conclusion, it is hypothesized that the above discussion may help to resolve the issue on language acquisition, which has been debated since early 1970s. It could be argued that why Chomsky considered language and cognition (including intellectual character of the mind) as separate entities is because his approach to language acquisition is heavily based on the acquisition of syntax. There is substantial evidence that shows the syntactic component of a language is innate and species-specific but not its semantic counterpart (Curtiss, 1977, 1981, as cited in Bohannon, 1993). However, Piaget's approach seems to provide strong arguments in relation to semantics. Therefore, it is undeniable that Piaget viewed language and cognition as interrelated because he believed that the attainment of meanings relies heavily on the continuous interaction between children's hereditary structure and their environment. This provides some evidence that each theory has a place in language acquisition. Could it be that in reality the two approaches are not contradictory, as claimed by most people, but parallel in explanations since both try to explain the same thing but based on totally different grounds? This is yet another issue that needs to be resolved in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Describe the impairments typically observed in children with autism and compare the different cognitive ...

    The Weak Central Coherence theory (CCT) proposes that instead of processing information as a whole and in context, children with autism may process information in a detailed fashion. CCT proposes an information processing style and aims to explain certain behaviours such as a high attention to detail, the need for sameness, sensitivity to stimuli, and fantastic abilities such as mathematics, music and memory.

  2. Computational Linguistics - How Important Is Semantics? Compared to What?

    In order to measure the importance of semantics in comparison to the other linguistic components of an NPL system we can look at what a system which stops short of incorporating semantic processes is capable of in comparison to one which does actually exploit semantics.

  1. is there a critical period in language acquisition?

    It was found that those who were introduced to the English language before the age of seven performed just as well as native English speakers. As age increased, performance of English decreased suggesting that a second language must be learnt before the critical period of language acquisition ends, which in this case appears to be around the age of seven.

  2. Do semantic categories aid encoding?

    After that participants would be asked to sign the consent form and to confirm that they understood they can withdraw from the experiment at anytime. This experiment was separated into two sessions; in the first session participants were given a stimulus sheet which includes some words on it.

  1. Cognitive heuristic approaches to decision making

    judgements, supports their proposal that people employ a limited number of heuristics or shortcuts allowing as quick information processing as possible (Taylor, 1982). The extensive amount of laboratory research on availability heuristic has revealed the wide range of settings in which it is used (Halpern, 1984).Moreover, availability heuristic is used

  2. Schizophrenia and related psychosis.

    Thinking in absolutes, categorising events dichotomously with no continuum being acknowledged is equally common. Furthermore there is a magnification or minimisation of the significance of events in an unrealistic way, individuals will personalise events, inappropriately identifying meaning without any causal connection.

  1. The use of concepts in the process of cognition in materialist dialectics.

    entities and events, are treated in thought and language as members of conceptual categories. Concepts or conceptual categories, are mental representations of objects, entities or events, sorted in memory. Thus the ability to place objects in conceptual categories is a fundamental property of perception.

  2. To what extent can biological investigations provide evidence to suggest language lateralisation correlates with ...

    laterality of auditory language processsing by presenting stimuli to each ear, investigating the ability to accurately identify sounds (Marek, n.d.a). ?The most common method used to determine language lateralisation referred to in this investigation is that of dichotic listening studies, in order to illustrate where language processing occurs in the brain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work