• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acquisition of Language: the Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky.

Extracts from this document...


A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IS THE DEBATE BETWEEN PIAGET AND CHOMSKY STILL HOLDS? Rafidah Aga Mohd Jaladin Department Of Educational Psychology & Counselling Faculty Of Education University Of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Abstract In language acquisition studies, the names Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky are not uncommon. They were known because they were the founders of language acquisition theories, which act as guidance for researchers to study language and language acquisition. Although these two theorists were the main contributors in the study of language, they had a different and contradictory viewpoint. Piaget emphasized on the role of cognitive development factors in language acquisition, whereas, Chomsky focused on the role of genetic endowment factors. This paper discusses the differences in Piaget's and Chomsky's approaches to language acquisition in an attempt to present a new perspective showing that each has a place. A special focus is given to their differences in opinions and approaches towards the study of syntax and semantics, which are the two important components of a language. Introduction How children acquire language is one of the key mysteries facing scientific enquiry into humans. ...read more.


Chomsky (1986) believed that TGG is the main constituent knowledge of language. TGG is defined as "an explicit description of the internalized rules of a language as they must have been mastered by an idealized speaker-hearer" (Sinclair-de-Zwart, 1969a, p.365). There are two major points in Chomsky's model of generative grammar. First, he asserted that there was an innate language acquisition device (LAD), which provides the basis for human linguistic competence. Chomsky proposed that the nature of LAD was like an innate "black box" which was capable of receiving linguistic input (the sentences of the language in which the child was growing up) and, from these, deriving universal grammatical rules (Garton, 1992). Once these universal grammatical rules are derived, LAD functions to yield a particular language through interaction with presented experience, that is, it helps to convert experience into a system of knowledge attained: knowledge of one (native language) or another (Chomsky, 1986). Second, he posited that each sentence had a surface structure (i.e., the actual arrangement of words that we hear or see), and a deep structure (i.e., the idea underlying the sentence) (Bohannon, 1993). ...read more.


Yet, correlation does not always infer causation (Bohannon, 1993). Conclusion In conclusion, it is hypothesized that the above discussion may help to resolve the issue on language acquisition, which has been debated since early 1970s. It could be argued that why Chomsky considered language and cognition (including intellectual character of the mind) as separate entities is because his approach to language acquisition is heavily based on the acquisition of syntax. There is substantial evidence that shows the syntactic component of a language is innate and species-specific but not its semantic counterpart (Curtiss, 1977, 1981, as cited in Bohannon, 1993). However, Piaget's approach seems to provide strong arguments in relation to semantics. Therefore, it is undeniable that Piaget viewed language and cognition as interrelated because he believed that the attainment of meanings relies heavily on the continuous interaction between children's hereditary structure and their environment. This provides some evidence that each theory has a place in language acquisition. Could it be that in reality the two approaches are not contradictory, as claimed by most people, but parallel in explanations since both try to explain the same thing but based on totally different grounds? This is yet another issue that needs to be resolved in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Cognition Development in Children

    It was interesting to see the correlation of these experiments to what we are learning in class. Out of the four subjects only one of the children have older siblings. This is where we saw the clustering. "Siblings are always competing for resources, with older siblings typically having the advantage

  2. Chomsky and Piaget: Assimilation and Accommodation.

    Leading the domain specific camp is a nativist view. Authors who take this approach argue that the "... possession of human language is associated with a specific type of mental organization..." (Chomsky, 1972, p. 70). This idea of 'mental organization' emphasises a language (or domain) specificity that is related to Fodor's (1983)

  1. Does language determine the way we think?

    if it had not been rotated far from its standard, upright position. If subjects were describing the rotated F to themselves using standard language the upside-down image should be one of the quickest to identify as the verbal labels for the upright image would simply be reversed (Pinker, 1994).

  2. is there a critical period in language acquisition?

    It was found that those who were introduced to the English language before the age of seven performed just as well as native English speakers. As age increased, performance of English decreased suggesting that a second language must be learnt before the critical period of language acquisition ends, which in this case appears to be around the age of seven.

  1. Consider the Relationship Between Thought and Language, from Developmental, Evolutionary, and Neurop

    Sinclair-de-Zwart (1967/1969) also found that language training in young children failed to influence problem solving. Interestingly, Piaget himself and other Piagetian researchers (eg. Inhelder and Karmiloff-Smith, 1978) believe that linguistic interaction with other children may help the child to advance intellectually, even though verbal training does not.

  2. What are the advantages and limitations of a cognitive neuropsychology approach to development disorders?

    disorders are similar to that found in developmental cases (cited in Temple, C, M. 1997b). Coltheart, M (2000) suggests that cognitive neuropsychology assumes that brain damage can only lead to subtraction from the system, but cannot add to it (this assumption stems from Fodors (1983)

  1. Is Language Sufficient to express Human Thought, or is there Thought beyond Language

    beautiful sunset, whilst anyone who has seen a sunset will be able to picture it in their mind, it is not ever accurately described by words. When the person attempts to translate the picture into words, justice is not done to the picture in the person's head, as language simply

  2. Learning - social, cognitive, and developmental psychologies offer several theories suggesting regarding what, when, ...

    Why Social Cognition suggests an interesting opinion into the reasons people learn. According to Fiske (2010), learning happens mainly because of cultural affects. The theory speculates that children learn because their culture trains them how to think and what to think, as in stereotyping, for example.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work