• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Acquisition of Language: the Debate Between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LANGUAGE ACQUISITION: IS THE DEBATE BETWEEN PIAGET AND CHOMSKY STILL HOLDS? Rafidah Aga Mohd Jaladin Department Of Educational Psychology & Counselling Faculty Of Education University Of Malaya 50603 Kuala Lumpur Abstract In language acquisition studies, the names Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky are not uncommon. They were known because they were the founders of language acquisition theories, which act as guidance for researchers to study language and language acquisition. Although these two theorists were the main contributors in the study of language, they had a different and contradictory viewpoint. Piaget emphasized on the role of cognitive development factors in language acquisition, whereas, Chomsky focused on the role of genetic endowment factors. This paper discusses the differences in Piaget's and Chomsky's approaches to language acquisition in an attempt to present a new perspective showing that each has a place. A special focus is given to their differences in opinions and approaches towards the study of syntax and semantics, which are the two important components of a language. Introduction How children acquire language is one of the key mysteries facing scientific enquiry into humans. ...read more.

Middle

Chomsky (1986) believed that TGG is the main constituent knowledge of language. TGG is defined as "an explicit description of the internalized rules of a language as they must have been mastered by an idealized speaker-hearer" (Sinclair-de-Zwart, 1969a, p.365). There are two major points in Chomsky's model of generative grammar. First, he asserted that there was an innate language acquisition device (LAD), which provides the basis for human linguistic competence. Chomsky proposed that the nature of LAD was like an innate "black box" which was capable of receiving linguistic input (the sentences of the language in which the child was growing up) and, from these, deriving universal grammatical rules (Garton, 1992). Once these universal grammatical rules are derived, LAD functions to yield a particular language through interaction with presented experience, that is, it helps to convert experience into a system of knowledge attained: knowledge of one (native language) or another (Chomsky, 1986). Second, he posited that each sentence had a surface structure (i.e., the actual arrangement of words that we hear or see), and a deep structure (i.e., the idea underlying the sentence) (Bohannon, 1993). ...read more.

Conclusion

Yet, correlation does not always infer causation (Bohannon, 1993). Conclusion In conclusion, it is hypothesized that the above discussion may help to resolve the issue on language acquisition, which has been debated since early 1970s. It could be argued that why Chomsky considered language and cognition (including intellectual character of the mind) as separate entities is because his approach to language acquisition is heavily based on the acquisition of syntax. There is substantial evidence that shows the syntactic component of a language is innate and species-specific but not its semantic counterpart (Curtiss, 1977, 1981, as cited in Bohannon, 1993). However, Piaget's approach seems to provide strong arguments in relation to semantics. Therefore, it is undeniable that Piaget viewed language and cognition as interrelated because he believed that the attainment of meanings relies heavily on the continuous interaction between children's hereditary structure and their environment. This provides some evidence that each theory has a place in language acquisition. Could it be that in reality the two approaches are not contradictory, as claimed by most people, but parallel in explanations since both try to explain the same thing but based on totally different grounds? This is yet another issue that needs to be resolved in the future. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Cognitive Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Cognitive Psychology essays

  1. Old Age: A Process of Growth and Decline, a Life -Span Developmental Perspective.

    Individual people vary greatly from one another, so too do their patterns of aging. Wisdom may increase as people age, whilst physical stamina may decrease. Activities such as reading may remain stable through the life cycle while other interests such as going to the theatre may change.

  2. Describe the impairments typically observed in children with autism and compare the different cognitive ...

    Shah and Frith, 1993 found that children with autism had an enhanced performance on a block design test where children had to recreate a nonsense shape, the authors concluded that the participants were exhibiting local processing ability at the expense of seeing the object as a whole.

  1. Schizophrenia and related psychosis.

    and recognise the possibility of changing the way they look at and interpret events. Beck and Weishaar (1989) described this process as collaborative empiricism, with therapist acting as a guide to understanding the connection between thought, emotions and behaviour. The client assumes responsibility for goal setting by monitoring thoughts and images and with setting behavioural and cognitive 'homework' tasks.

  2. Eyewitness performance in Cognitive and Structured interviews.

    Where a person was mentioned, interviewers were asked to elicit details about clothing. They were specifically instructed to avoid leading, misleading, and forced-choice questions. The CI interviewers received additional training in the activation and probing of images relating to various parts of the event.

  1. Does language determine the way we think?

    found that English speakers (whose language possesses the subjunctive) showed better comprehension of a counterfactual passage than Chinese speakers, possibly due to the added processing and memory burden of counterfactual reasoning in Chinese. However, Au (1984) questioned the reliability of these results as the Chinese translation of the counterfactual passage was written in unidiomatic Chinese, and at times the Chinese version was genuinely ambiguous rather than counterfactual.

  2. Is Language Sufficient to express Human Thought, or is there Thought beyond Language

    This will not offer a complete solution to our problem as although feelings and pictures certainly form a part of human thought, even when the human has language, they can not be used for complex thought over logical puzzles such as building shelter, finding warmth or even food.

  1. Cognitive heuristic approaches to decision making

    Participants then independently completed the task by marking their answer on the paper with a pencil. PROCEDURE The study was held in the University of Glasgow's psychology lab during a practical session on heuristics. The participants sat around 4 tables in small groups.

  2. To what extent can biological investigations provide evidence to suggest language lateralisation correlates with ...

    145). Our knowledge of the variability of cerebral language lateralization is limited often to the studies of patients with brain lesions, however through these types of studies it is possible to understand organisation of cerebral functions. This is demonstrated through the same primary language capacity in participants with lesions, and through

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work