• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Aggression in Gill (1966).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Debbie Spicer Aggression Gill (1966) proposed that aggression has several features: * It is a behaviour: actually doing something not just wanting to do it. * It involves harm or an injury to another living organism: it can either be physical harm or psychological harm such as creating fear in an opponent. * It involves intent and is not done by accident Baron stated that 'aggression is any form of behaviour toward the goal of harming or injuring another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment'. Aggression is behaviour which is intentional and deliberate and it involves injury to another person. Assertion A performer who plays with energy and emotion and within the rules of the game is showing assertive behaviours. Assertive behaviour is acceptable but forceful behaviour. It is also; * Goal directed behaviour * The use of valid verbal or physical force * Behaviour which has no intention to harm or injure * Behaviour which does ...read more.

Middle

E.g. getting angry at work, building up aggression then becoming aggressive in a football match after work. Instinct theories of aggression These theories suggest that aggression is an instinct that has evolved to help us survive. The psychoanalytical approach Freud claimed that we have instincts which have to be satisfied. These instincts create an energy drive which is used to satisfaction. Aggression is part of what he called out death instincts, which are destructive. They are in conflict with our life instincts (called eros), which are positive and creative. Freud and Lorenze saw aggression as building up within a person with eros directing it away from self to some other kind of aggressive behaviour. The ethological approach Aggression is seen as building up within humans which creates a drive. If it is not released in a constructive way achieving catharsis (using sport to let out aggression) ...read more.

Conclusion

The frustration-aggression theory This theory suggests that aggression is both inherited and learned and it is related to frustration. Frustration occurs when we are prevented from achieving our goals. Dollard et al (1939) argued that aggression is an inherited response that only occurs in frustrating situations. Aggression is always caused by frustration and frustration will always cause some sort of aggression. Miller claimed that frustration makes aggression more likely to occur, but it may not be shown. This is the frustration-aggression model Limitations on this model are: * not all frustration leads to aggression in sport * aggression can be a learned response and does not always happen as a result of frustration * individual and situational differences are not taken into account * the cathartic effect of aggression is not upheld * Frustration leads to a pre-disposition to behave aggressively by increasing anger and arousal. This arousal and anger will only lead to aggression if certain learned cues or environmental stimuli are present. This is the revised model of the frustration-aggression theory ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Psychology essays

  1. Comparing and contrasting the Social learning theory of aggression with the Frustration-Aggression theory of ...

    not necessarily applicable for the society, and could be well used even within the social learning theory to prove that those prisoners who were in more crowded environment, simply imitated what they saw and therefore the aggression level rose. The other factor is Deindividuation, where people are thought to become

  2. juvenile conflict with law

    These are essential to the child. The super ego is often seen as the internalized rules and admonitions of the parents and through them, of society. The super ego acts on the ego; thus when a child desires a biscuit it may not take one even if it could not be punished because the child starts to reprove itself.

  1. An eight-page paper discussing the cause of aggressiveness in humans - nature or nurture

    Zillmann summarizes several studies showing that aggressive fantasies interfere with the reduction of anger and actually aggravate anger in "Hostility and Aggression". When recently fired employees were interviewed and encouraged to talk about their hostility towards their ex - company, their hostility increased.

  2. Theories of Aggression

    The experiment was also completely unethical as Bandura conditioned these young children to new ways of aggression that they had not known before, and he did not get consent from the children's parents.

  1. Personality and aggression

    For example when sitting in a job interview a persons perception of the environment would be different from there perception when dancing in a night club, from this perception there behaviour changes accordingly Inner ring - the inner ring is the natural responses a person has to the environment or situation they are in.

  2. The relationship between aggressive play in footballmatches and the response of the viewers.

    Richards (1994) suggested that football is particularly important in sublimating our aggressive instincts. An alternative to instinct theory is social learning theory. It suggests that aggression can be learnt by imitation and reinforcement. Children witness aggressive play in sport combined with positive reinforcement, e.g the coach's praise for scoring in the match due to aggressive play.

  1. The Mertonian Principles Revised: Can the Normative Structure of SciencePrevent Fraud?

    profit), but by the wish to extend scientific knowledge. Finally, organized skepticism means that scientists should be encouraged to examine openly, honestly, and publicly each other's work and provide constructive criticism. Merton believed that conforming to these norms generates two types of control mechanisms that discourage fraud in science.5 According to him, the first is an "inner mechanism" secured

  2. Are humans naturally aggressive or do we learn to be aggressive?

    Nonetheless âthis work had a considerable impact on the acceptance of social factors... [and] it had a long-term wider effect on wider thinking about the origins of aggressionâ (Hogg and Vaughan, 2005, pg 445). This theory also has positive implications in that if aggression is a learned process, then we

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work