Aggression in Gill (1966).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Debbie Spicer Aggression Gill (1966) proposed that aggression has several features: * It is a behaviour: actually doing something not just wanting to do it. * It involves harm or an injury to another living organism: it can either be physical harm or psychological harm such as creating fear in an opponent. * It involves intent and is not done by accident Baron stated that 'aggression is any form of behaviour toward the goal of harming or injuring another living being who is motivated to avoid such treatment'. Aggression is behaviour which is intentional and deliberate and it involves injury to another person. Assertion A performer who plays with energy and emotion and within the rules of the game is showing assertive behaviours. Assertive behaviour is acceptable but forceful behaviour. It is also; * Goal directed behaviour * The use of valid verbal or physical force * Behaviour which has no intention to harm or injure * Behaviour which does ...read more.

Middle

E.g. getting angry at work, building up aggression then becoming aggressive in a football match after work. Instinct theories of aggression These theories suggest that aggression is an instinct that has evolved to help us survive. The psychoanalytical approach Freud claimed that we have instincts which have to be satisfied. These instincts create an energy drive which is used to satisfaction. Aggression is part of what he called out death instincts, which are destructive. They are in conflict with our life instincts (called eros), which are positive and creative. Freud and Lorenze saw aggression as building up within a person with eros directing it away from self to some other kind of aggressive behaviour. The ethological approach Aggression is seen as building up within humans which creates a drive. If it is not released in a constructive way achieving catharsis (using sport to let out aggression) ...read more.

Conclusion

The frustration-aggression theory This theory suggests that aggression is both inherited and learned and it is related to frustration. Frustration occurs when we are prevented from achieving our goals. Dollard et al (1939) argued that aggression is an inherited response that only occurs in frustrating situations. Aggression is always caused by frustration and frustration will always cause some sort of aggression. Miller claimed that frustration makes aggression more likely to occur, but it may not be shown. This is the frustration-aggression model Limitations on this model are: * not all frustration leads to aggression in sport * aggression can be a learned response and does not always happen as a result of frustration * individual and situational differences are not taken into account * the cathartic effect of aggression is not upheld * Frustration leads to a pre-disposition to behave aggressively by increasing anger and arousal. This arousal and anger will only lead to aggression if certain learned cues or environmental stimuli are present. This is the revised model of the frustration-aggression theory ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Psychology essays

  1. juvenile conflict with law

    Criminality is then seen as one of the outward signs of the disease, or of the problematic resolution of the mental conflict, just as physical deformity may be the manifestation of a physical disease16. Freud split the personality into three parts17: 1.

  2. Are humans naturally aggressive or do we learn to be aggressive?

    As a result it has been generally accepted, however he was criticised by Bandura and Walters (1963) who pointed out âBandura...tells us that children acquire aggressive responses as a result of watching others, but does not tell us much about why a child would be motivated to perform the same behaviour...â (as cited in Cardwell and Flanagan, 2009, pg 61).

  1. Comparing and contrasting the Social learning theory of aggression with the Frustration-Aggression theory of ...

    These arguments are often us in debate to oppose TV violence, that is thought to invoke aggression in children). However, it does not give any account for possible innate causes of aggression, and therefore faces problems when explaining, for example, high levels of aggression in an individual who has not

  2. An eight-page paper discussing the cause of aggressiveness in humans - nature or nurture

    Purpose of the Study Humans exhibit aggressiveness on a regular basis. The question to be asked is why are some people more aggressive than others are and what are the factors responsible for this aggressiveness. Are violent children conceived or created?

  1. Personality and aggression

    For example when sitting in a job interview a persons perception of the environment would be different from there perception when dancing in a night club, from this perception there behaviour changes accordingly Inner ring - the inner ring is the natural responses a person has to the environment or situation they are in.

  2. Personality Correlates (Aggression and Impulsivity) and their Predictive Ability to Self-Report Delinquency

    More recently, psychologists and criminologists have suggested that the personality of delinquents must also be considered more meticulously to understand the reasons and motives of individuals who choose a life of deviance (Andrews & Bonta, 1994; Clinard, Quinney & Wildeman, 1994; Walters, 1990).

  1. Theories of Aggression

    Although the experiment did show strong evidence that children are likely to copy behaviour, the experiment does have some negative points. The experiment was completed under artificial conditions, therefore it lacks ecological validity. The results therefore cannot be generalized to real life situations.

  2. The Mertonian Principles Revised: Can the Normative Structure of SciencePrevent Fraud?

    profit), but by the wish to extend scientific knowledge. Finally, organized skepticism means that scientists should be encouraged to examine openly, honestly, and publicly each other's work and provide constructive criticism. Merton believed that conforming to these norms generates two types of control mechanisms that discourage fraud in science.5 According to him, the first is an "inner mechanism" secured

  • Over 180,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.