Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7

Animal Testing

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

Animal Testing Introduction The application of animals to test a large number of products from household compounds and cosmetics to Pharmaceutical products has been considered to be a normal strategy for many years. Laboratory animals are generally used in three primary fields: biomedical research, product security evaluation and education (animal experiments). It has been estimated that approximately, 20 million animals are being used for testing and are killed annually; about 15 million of them are used to test for medication and five million for other products. Reports have been generated to indicate that about 10 percent of these animals are not being administered with painkillers. The supporters of animal rights are pressurizing government agencies to inflict severe regulations on animal research. However, such emerging criticisms of painful experimentation on animals are coupled with an increasing concern over the cost it would have on the limitation of scientific progress (i.e. cures). Around the world, animals are utilized to test products ranging from shampoo to new cancer drugs. Each and every medication used by humans is first tested on the animals. Currently, questions have been raised about the ethics surrounding animal testing. As a result, several regulations have been put in place to evaluate and control the animals being used for testing purposes. These regulations hope to ensure that such research is carried out in a humanely and ethical manner. Acceptance of such experimentations is subject to a lot of argumentation. As the statistics indicate, animal testing is dangerous and harmful, but medical research must continue. We need to find other testing techniques that are advanced in order to eliminate this harmful process, till then all we can do is continue with our research. Arguments for testing The supporters of animal testing argue that if animal testing is eliminated, that many of the medications and procedures that we currently use today would not exist and the development of future treatments would be extremely limited.

Middle

(Alternatives to Animal testing on the Web: FAQs) An Italian Professor Peitro Croce has been fighting against animal testing for several years. The arguments he puts forth includes misleading results of animal tests while they are applied to humans. Parsley is considered to be a deadly poison for parrots yet we use it to flavor our food; Arsenic, a poison for humans but it is not harmful to sheep. Sheep, goats, horses and mice can also eat hemlock in large numbers while this is toxic to the humans. Lemon juice is toxic to the cats. A hedgehog can take a sufficient amount of opium can be taken by a hedgehog at one sitting but humans can't without the obvious effect. Morphine is regarded as an anesthetic for humans but if it is administered to cats; it generates a state of frenzied excitement. (Vivisection: Fact Sheet) Vitamin C is not something dogs, rats, hamsters and mice, have to worry about taking, for their bodies generate Vitamin C. If humans inhale a small amount of prussic acid fumes it can kill them. However, toads, sheep and hedgehogs can drink it without any harm; Scopolamine can kill humans with a dose of just 5 milligrams. To dogs and cats about 100 milligrams was considered harmless. Information like this can be misleading when scientists try to determine safe dogages. Penicillin, the first antibiotic, was experimented first on mice. Its application on guinea pigs would have entailed dangerous consequences, because penicillin controls the floral bacteria in the stomachs of guinea pigs and destroys them within a few days. The unpredictability of animal testing was thought to have harmful effect in the case of fialuridine. This drug successfully passed its animal test phase without much difficulty. However, when it is administered on fifteen human volunteers it resulted in severe liver damage, causing death to five of them and compelling two others to have liver transplants.

Conclusion

For example if a scientists needs to study the brain of a rat, he can allow the other scientist to make use of the kidneys, or livers or parts for there concerned studies. Horst Spielmann of ZEBET of the German center for animal testing substitutes has reviewed decades of industry data on pesticides. He found out while mice and rats are reactionary to a chemical, it does not have to experience further tests on dogs. Spielmann expects that about 70% of tests on dogs can now be successfully avoided. There is a common attempt by researchers to use lab animals that are less prone to undergo the sensations of pain or discomfort. In Canada, many studies have substituted mammals with fish and now researchers are even attempting to apply bacteria in tests rather than the rats. Instead of shaving the back of an anaesthetized rabbit to test a skin product, can we use "Corrositex" a synthetic material for the same purpose. Similar solutions ought to be devised for many other kinds of experiments that presently use the animals. Conclusion: While there has been promise to find alternatives to animal testing, the best researchers can do for now is try to reduce the number of animals being used. They can resort to new scanning technologies like magnetic Resonance Imaging, which can assist doctors to learn about disease from human patients without the actual necessity for invasive surgery, or animal experimentation. Computer models can be used to devise the reaction of a drug to the animal, as a result it would eliminate the necessity for live animal experimentations. (Animal Experiments) The development to the extensive application of substitutes to animal experimentation will persistently gain momentum as people become more aware about the problem. Though it is hard to eliminate animal testing completely, consumers can prevent the unnecessary animal testing by boycotting certain products that don't necessary require animal testing. To conclude, all we has humans can do now is to try to reduce the number of animals being harmed in these experiments aimed at benefiting society.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Zoology

  1. Vegetarianism is a groing trend right now with more and more people choosing it ...

    Every human is a free personality that can think and act independently upon a certain age. Eating meat just because some animals do is not a good example for the cultural and social development of the humans. On the one hand some people try to justify their meat diet with

  2. Many industries use animal testing to research the effects of their products on humans. ...

    Animals have to suffer the pain because of chemical testing; their sacrifice will find a cure for thousands of patients all over the world. Animal testing involves development of medicines to some diseases such as antibiotics, HIV drugs, and insulin and cancer treatments.

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    from the original study of Bennett-Levy and Marteau, due to the fact that we only included ratings of fear, harmfulness and strangeness. In the original study, closeness, sliminess, speediness and mode of movement were also included. Throughout our study we found that the strongest correlation was between perceived fear and perceived strangeness.

  2. Free essay

    Importance of correct identification of insect material.

    and nematodes (roundworms) giving an indication of the environment (Goff 2000). An experiment carried out by Hilke Schroeder on 117 corpses in 2001 showed the most common summer insect was L. sericata and in the winter months were Calliphora vicina (Diptera: Calliphoridae)

  1. Examine Jonson's use in Volpone of animal imagery

    I think Jonson is saying that he is not an animal but has lost his human qualities. His name leaves the audience in no doubt as to the expected behaviour of Volpone, that he will as a fox, outwit his associates.

  2. Animal Testing Argument.

    In 1998 in the UK a staggering 2,659,662 experiments were conducted on 2,593,587 animals. Since 1990 the number of experiments on genetically manipulated animals in Britain has risen by 827%, making this the most rapidly expanding area of animal experimentation in the UK.

  1. The Medicinal Potential of the Poison Dart Frog.

    Batrachotoxin and homobatrachotoxin are among the most potent of all naturally occurring nonprotein poisons. The current thoughts behind the mechanism consist of (a) a generation of an action potential in nerve, i.e., depolarisation of the nerve membrane with passive diffusion of sodium ions into the axon (increase sodium permeability), followed

  2. The grasslands of North American are called as prairies; they cover about 1.4 million ...

    Prairie chernozems are blackish in their upper horizons because of the constant decay of grasses into dark humus. Taller-grass prairies have browner soils, richer in humus and loamy in structure. VEGETATION. Grassland is largely dominated by grasses, but with annual and perennial forbs intermixed in different proportions in different areas.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.