Bacterial Leaching

Cu2+ (aq) + 2LH (organic) CuL2 (organic) + 2H+ (aq)

This process can then be reversed by mixing the organic solution with a small amount of concentrated acid. This pushes the Cu2+ ions into the solution containing the acid gaining a further increase in the concentration of Cu2+ ions. Both of these processes depend on the pH. The leftover solution then goes to an open pond where t. ferro-oxidans catalyses oxidation of the remaining Fe2+ ions to Fe3+ ions. This recharges the solution, which is then pumped back to the top of the waste pile to start the process again. The separated copper is then collected by an electro-winning process, an electric current is passed through the solution and the Cu2+ ions collect on the negative cathodes of pure copper.

At the moment bacterial leaching of copper is only used as a secondary method of obtaining copper due to the slow rate at which the bacteria work meaning that companies may have to wait ten years before they see a return on their investment. The advantage of bacterial leaching is its price, it is a very cheap process when compared to traditional methods. Mining copper by the traditional method can cost between $130 and $200 per tonne, while bacterial leaching costs 70$ a tonne. It can obtain copper from ore of too low a percentage for traditional methods to be viable. It also makes use of waste dumps turning useless rock in to capital. This is used to great affect at Bingham canyon were 100 000 tonnes of waste is produced each day. The process of bacterial leaching is also a lot more friendly to the environment, a lot less energy is required, it makes use of polluting piles of waste and does not release sulphur dioxide in to the air unlike smelting which releases two tonnes of Sulphur dioxides for every tonne of copper. Bacterial leaching is used as a secondary process in the extraction of copper because the process is to slow and uneconomic because less money is made giving not enough return quick enough to make back the expenditure.

The technique of using the bacteria Sulpholobus acidocalderius to catalyse oxidation of the gold encapsulating sulphide minerals by dioxygen, under aqueous conditions at 70oC before cyanidation, was discovered due to the reorganisation of London university, leading to the combined research of two groups. This technique raised the recovery of gold from 10% to 100%.

Graph comparing the traditional method against the new

method of bacterial leaching

A PhD student called Ali Nobar introduced a mixed culture of moderately thermophillic bacteria from certain samples. This culture was effective over a wide range of conditions such as temperature 30oC - 55oC, pH, water, salinity and arsenic concentration. The bacteria worked best at 46 degrees c and in solutions with a pH of between 0.5 and 1.5. These greatly enhanced the percentage of gold extraction. In traditional methods of gold extraction froth flotation is used to separate refractory minerals from any unwanted oxide ores. This produces a sulphide concentrate, which is then roasted to liberate the gold, the gold is then extracted by cyanidation. This method only retrieved 10%-15% of the gold as a lot stayed trapped in fused silicate minerals. Where as bacterial leaching frees all the gold particles by catalysing the formation of iron (II), arsenic (III) and sulphur (VI) as soluble compounds.

The bacteria then catalyses the oxidation of the iron and arsenic.

Leaving cyanidation to collect all the gold particles. Waste products from this process are then treated with hydrated calcium hydroxide, which neutralises the sulphuric acid and causes the precipitation of a gelatinous mixture of iron, arsenates and iron oxohydroxide. The bacterial process of extracting gold is used as a primary process (secondary process is the traditional method) because the research and technology has been developed to a high degree. It is more economic because more gold is produced so more money to be made. There is also a low cost of running the plants. Also the whole process is more feasible and economically competitive with the conventional process.

For a new process to become commercial the government and political powers must approve and also regulate a new process and may need to provide funding in to research. The countries government would need to hold an enquiry into the effects of this new technology on the environment and population to check if it is mandatory and a viable safe method of production. Thus granting permission for the new technology to go ahead.