Can 'learning' explain phobias about snakes or creepy-crawlies

Authors Avatar

Learning happens quite naturally and goes by quite unnoticed but in many cases we have to put effort and work hard to learn things (Pritchard, 2009). Learning is crucial for mastering new skills, for personality and emotional development and social interaction. This essay will discuss ‘learning’ and phobia looking from behaviourist and cognitive approaches and argue can learning explain phobias about snakes or ‘creepy-crawlies’.

        

This paragraph will consider what is ‘learning’ and how behaviourists and cognitivists explain ‘learning’. Learning may be defined as a relatively permanent change in behaviour or behaviour potential based on experience. Our capacity for learning depends upon both genetic heritage and the nature of our environment (Zimbardo, 1992). We learn by interacting with our environment. Sometimes we have no explicit teacher but we have a direct sensorimotor connection to environment. Exercising this connection produces a wealth of information about: cause and effect, the consequences or actions and what to do in order to achieve goals. When we are learning we are acutely aware of how our environment responds to what we do and we seek to influence what happens through our behaviour (Sutton & Barto, 1998).

‘Learning’ by behavioural approach assumes that a learner is essentially passive, responding to environmental stimuli. (Learning Theories Knowledgebase, 2010). Learning will take place if the learner displays behaviour related to the new learning. The behaviourists de-emphasize the brain or mental activity in the learning process and believe that the brain is simply like any other organ; its neural activities are conditioned to occur based upon a past history of consequences. ‘Learning’ occurs when new consequences are experienced (Blanchard & Thacker, 2004). Behaviourists claim that the environment controls learning, people respond to stimuli in their environment, and their response is positively or negatively reinforced. A person will learn from this reinforcement to either continue displaying that behaviour if it was positively reinforced, or not to display that behaviour if it resulted in a negative reinforcement or consequence (Ford, 2009).

Join now!

Cognitivism claims that even though learning can be inferred from behaviour, it is separate from the behaviour itself (Blanchard & Thacker, 2004). It is defined as a relatively permanent change in cognition occurring as a result of experience. Cognition refers to the mental processing of information. Cognitivism states that people are rational beings who require active participation in order to learn, whose actions are a consequence of thinking. Here the learner’s role is active, self-directed, and self-evaluating. The approach suggests that the learner controls learning, he decides what is important to learn and learn through techniques he feels comfortable with. ...

This is a preview of the whole essay