• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Classic studies in psychology merely tell us what we already know. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


Classic studies in psychology merely tell us what we already know. Discuss. Word count: 1917. Classic studies in psychology merely tell us what we already knew. Discuss. So called 'classic' studies are dubbed such because of the high profile they have achieved, normally attributed to the influence the study has had or the contribution it has made to a specific area of psychology. Although no-one can dispute that some of these studies affected the way in which certain topics were approached and interpreted, whether they simply reiterated what we already knew is a subject open for discussion. It could be argued that it is sometimes other factors relating to the experiment, rather than the experiment itself, that magnetises the publicity and consequently the high profile. As these are the experiments that will be the most documented and those most referred to in general conversation and academic forums alike, it is easy to assume that they are responsible for the knowledge they represent, even if this is not exactly the true. It has been said that this is the case for Milgram's obedience study (1963). Milgram had led participants to believe they were participating in an experiment to do with memory and that they were required to 'shock' (although no shocks were actually given) another participant (who was in fact a confederate) with increasing intensity if they got a question wrong. The huge ethical implications of the study could have been enough to propel it into the media spotlight without the actual contribution to social psychology playing much part in the publicity, and therefore it may not have unearthed anything we didn't know previously. ...read more.


of the behaviour of the participants surpassed expectations, and therefore it did give new information as to the severity of the problem. The predominant view held before this experiment was conducted was that the reason prisoners and prison guards acted in the way they did because of the type of people likely to belong to each group as for example, prisoners will be such because they have committed a crime and therefore will be the type of person who will be deviant. This experiment disproved this, as these participants conformed to their roles as they do in real prisons, despite being randomly allocated and psychologically normal and healthy students. Therefore, it would appear that new information and a new insight was achieved by the study, despite the claim that the only reason for its high status is the reaction it received for being so unethical. However, even Zimbardo himself admits it is unlikely it could ever be repeated due to stricter ethical guidelines, so this could be one aspect of the study's popularity as it is, and will always be, the only authority on this particular topic. Bandura, Ross and Ross (1961) is another study that has been called a classic. This was one of the first experiments using a bobo doll to demonstrate the existence of vicarious or observational learning and involved 72 children, 36 male and 36 female aged from 37 to 69 months. These children were divided into 8 groups, with half being exposed to aggressive models and half non-aggressive models and divided further into male or female models. ...read more.


Therefore in this respect, the experiment does indeed give a lot of information and clarity to the topic that would not have otherwise been present. However, despite the arguments outlined above, Bandura still fails to offer an explanation of the underlying mechanisms behind the behaviour recorded. As with the Milgram study, it could be said that without this the information that the experiment produced is redundant as it simply elaborates on what has been discovered previously without trying to give detailed reasons for why it occurs, which some have argued is the point of psychology. In conclusion, due to the huge amount of publicity and acknowledgment classic studies in psychology receive, it is easy for them to be misinterpreted or for the results to be perceived as more groundbreaking than they actually are. Previous experiments have in some cases predicted the results found in such studies which could lead people to the opinion that they do simply reiterate what has already been discovered. However, in many cases such as Bandura et al (1961), this knowledge has been added to and this has made it possible to generalise the findings to situations not covered by this original research. Although certain of areas of psychology have been well investigated, sometimes it requires clarification or further support and some of the classic studies in psychology have served this purpose. Because of this, it is occasionally hard to ascertain if these studies do repeat the results found by the studies they are based on or if their contribution is sufficient for it to be deemed as new information, leaving the answer very much down to individual opinion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Psychology essays

  1. Assess media violence in the world's media.

    The real problem in that example is that the children were disobedient, not that they viewed a forbidden show. Even for children who do listen, it is simply too difficult for a parent to screen or supervise every episode of every television show their children choose to watch.

  2. Explain the importance of team building, the stages in the development of team cohesion ...

    They are calm, good at listening, delegating work and recognising the value of other team members. They are the people who must make the best use of the team's resources, recognise the team's strengths and weaknesses and ensure the best use of members' potential.

  1. Multiple Sclerosis: Functional History (Department of Psychology - University of Liverpool)

    During this time, civil rights protests for accessible housing, transportation, employment and education invited new debate about self determination and the 'real' meaning of access (Longmore and Goldberger, 2000).

  2. Evolutionary Psychology.

    A supportive survey, conducted by the Centers for Disease Control found that males were more likely than females to have carried a gun in the last 30 days (CDC: 1999a). Obviously, a bullet is more lethal than a scathingly delivered racial slur, hence the higher percentages of morbidity seen with gun use.

  1. What does this table tell us about the identities of people visiting Englands National ...

    The 89% of adults asked that don't have a disability provide the 83% that visit England's National Parks therefore creating unmarked identities. The age of adults visiting the park is predominately 45+ (57%). The percentage is also higher (a difference of 11 percentage points)

  2. Debate to what extent psychology meets the criterion for a science?

    Moreover, potentially be told in school and at home that if they can not do maths or even biology, perhaps they can do psychology. The public idea of psychology as science can also be influenced by those who do not have the training but instead rely on common sense and beliefs, belittling the subject and the way that is perceived.

  1. Explain Milgram's concept of the agentic state and discuss whether it is a valid ...

    Adorno (1950) argues that personality plays a factor in obedience and suggests that if an individual has an ?authoritarian personality? they are more likely to respect hierarchical systems and obey authority. Adorno proposes that individuals with this personality type would have been less likely to be aggressive towards parents and

  2. Yawning through technical mediums. The object of the experiment was to see if ...

    This example greater supports the experimenter?s use of these components to explore yawning through the aforementioned technical mediums. Auditory Medium The auditory component of yawn contagion is also equally important in determining degrees of empathy. A study was conducted to analyze brain activity of auditory yawning through Functional Magnetic Resonance imaging (fMRI).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work