Compare and Contrast Vertebrate and Invertebrate Vision

Authors Avatar

Jessica Beveridge                                                 PoO Supervisions: Dawn Muddyman

Compare and Contrast Vertebrate and Invertebrate Vision

Although vertebrates and invertebrates originally evolved from a common ancestral root, both have developed very different physical utilities for vision.  Both are fairly effective and have taken many millions of years to evolve.  They contain many common underlying mechanisms but differ in the features used to provide them.

        The definition of an eye is ‘an organ of visual perception that includes parts specialized for optical processing of light as well as well as photoreceptive neurons’ (Alberts).  The main feature of an eye therefore, in all organisms that possess one, is the collection of photoreceptors used in converting light energy into action potentials (electrical energy).  When comparing vertebrate and invertebrate vision, the two best-studied cases are the compound eye exemplified by arthropods and the simple eye used in vertebrates.

        The main difference between the compound and simple eye is that the compound eye uses a spatial array of lenses so that each image in a local region of visual space falls onto one or a few photoreceptors.  The simple eye, however, uses a single lens to image the world onto an array of photoreceptors.

        Compound eyes produce mosaic images.  The compound eye is made up of many optical units called ommatidiums, each of which is aimed at a different part of the visual field.  Each ommatidium samples a different part of the visual field through a separate lens.  In a simple eye, each receptor cell samples part of the field through a lens shared by all receptor cells. In compound eyes, each ommatidium samples an angular cone-shaped portion of the environment, taking in about 2-3° of the visual field.  In contrast, each receptor of a simple eye may sample as little as 0.2° of the visual field.  In addition, the simple eye, inverts the image that falls on the retina.  Since the receptive field of each ommatidium is relatively large, compound eyes have lower visual acuity than simple eyes.  The mosaic image formed by a compound eye is also coarser than that of a simple eye.  

                The simple eye in vertebrates focuses incident light in two stages.  In the initial stage, incident light rays are refracted as they pass through the clear outer surface of the eye, called the cornea.  They are further refracted as they pass through a second structure, the lens, and finally form an inverted image on the rear internal surface of the eye, the retina.  Objects at different distance can be focussed in higher vertebrates by changing the curvature and thickness of the lens, which affects its focal length, the distance at which an image passed through the lens comes into focus.

        Diffraction is a property of all light and because of this, the angular resolution (resolving power) of any eye is limited by the diameter of its lens.  The larger the lens diameter, the higher spatial resolution.  The biggest problem for compound eyes is that the resolution is limited because the facets of the individual lens are so small.  A compound eye of a given size will have a much lower resolving power than a simple eye of the same size.  

Join now!

        Optical superposition compound eyes are one way of increasing the effective lens diameter.  This structure works by using several separate elements to image incident rays onto a single point, such as a single photoreceptor.   This method is used in insects such as fireflies.  Another way, is to use ‘neural superposition’.

        Simple eyes on the other hand, use a single lens, and have evolved entirely separately in the cephalopods and vertebrates.  The octopus is a good example because the optical design of its eyes is remarkably similar to the vertebrate eye.  The one major difference, however is that in octopus eyes, ...

This is a preview of the whole essay