• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Comparing and contrasting the Social learning theory of aggression with the Frustration-Aggression theory of aggression.

Extracts from this document...


Comparing and contrasting the Social learning theory of aggression with the Frustration-Aggression theory of aggression. Filip Cabart In order to examine the two different approaches to aggression there is a clear necessity to define aggression as a term. Aggression is described as aversive behavior, usually directed onto a specific object. The two theories elaborate upon if aggression is or is not only a product of the surrounding environment or a product of the environment combined with the innate factors. The social learning theory is the one stating that aggression is evoked only by the environment, and therefore that it is a learned behavior. The key process in adopting aggressive behavior is the process of modeling, where the observer perceives aggression, usually in a positive manner and then tries to imitate it. All is based on the basic concept of operant and classical conditioning, where the observer is passively reinforced by the consequences of behavior of the observed aggressor and then he would be more or less likely to imitate it, depending if the consequences of observed aggression were positive (reinforcement) or negative (discouragement). To prove the theory, Bandura, Ross, and Ross (1961) conducted an experiment where young children (average age 52 months), were to see an aggressive model hit a bobo doll, and the children were then observed to imitate that behavior. ...read more.


This could give possible account for the inner drive of aggression, when people who had no apparent reason to harm the victim gave higher shock when their identity was covered and therefore they were freed from social norms and expectations that they should not cause harm to others. This is closely linked to the last factor which is the conformity to norms. Marsh (1978) studied aggression and norms within groups of football hooligans. His research supports the claim that aggression can be produced through conformity to norms of aggression that society and environment impose onto people. Within the group of football hooligans violence and aggression were expected by the group, however only to a certain extend (eg. Bleeding of the beaten opponent), exceeding this upper limit lead to exclusion from the group and such behavior was regarded as deviant. This seems as if aggressive behavior was elicited by a pattern of logical thought, however practically this takes place rather within the unconscious. These factors are only to give an account of the social factors effecting behavior, there are however two other branches that consider the non-social approach to aggression. These are the physiological approach and the drive theory approach. The physiological consists of the Genetic causes theory, that claims that the responsibility for aggression lies on a 'violent gene'. ...read more.


It is rather separated (mainly within the non-social factors) into numerous branches and different approaches. This does not necessarily mean to be demerit of the theory, however it gives it a fractionated appearance. The main difference in between the theories in means of implications for reducing aggression is that the frustration-aggression theory regards aggression is inevitable part of life an is looking for constructive ways to release it (very much Freudian catharsis) because the process of reducing frustration is unrealistic, but the social learning theory is looking for ways to avoid learning aggressive behavior. The frustration-aggression theory however faces the criticism that frustration does not always lead to aggressive behavior, and vice versa, that aggressive behavior does not necessarily have to be triggered by frustration. This could be countered by stating that the unobservable 'mental aggression' such as aggressive fantasy does not have to be physically manifested and therefore remains unobserved, and that frustration is very hard to define and even harder to determine whether or not it took place. To fully answer whether there are innate factors leading to aggressive behavior or not, there is a need to rely on further, mainly physiological research, because this is the only area in which clear evidence for innate causes of aggression could be provided, and therefore the only area where there could be the main difference between the two theories clearly evaluated. Graded a 6, no major flaws ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Social Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Social Psychology essays

  1. Discuss the causes of Conformity and Obedience

    The real subject always sat in the seventh chair, Asch then went around asking everyone for their answer, they were to announce it publicly without any discussion. Each member was instructed to give the same wrong answer, so that when it came to the real participant he had to decide

  2. Compare and contrast the labelling perspective and rational choice theory.

    Almost never have perfect information about risk (Sparks, 1997). Policy helps justify get tough policies after all if it pays to commit crime increase punishments, cost of commiting crime increases legitimate get tough policies Critiques We may need to know more about the agent's wants and desires (cf.

  1. Skinner's behaviorism and Bandura's cognitive social learning of personality

    Behavior change is due to operate on the environment, not self direct. People change themselves behavior seem to be spontaneous in observational learning, however, people change themselves behavior seem to be compulsory. The limitation of operant conditioning is that the new behavior is not long lasting after the environmental change.

  2. Free essay

    In their attempts to transcend the individual-society dualism in understandings of the self, how ...

    For example it could be argued that the description of the burka that Holloway (2007) cites carries a sense of negativity about wearing a burka and this could be deemed as being interpretative which in turn could be held responsible for insinuating that Shakila holds had agency within her social constraints.

  1. When and why do we rely on stereotypes?

    in real-life situations that were not controlled or present in this study. However, the hypothesis has been supported by subsequent studies such as Wolfe and Spencer (1996) despite the suggestion that it is slightly outdated. Another reason behind stereotyping that has been proposed is the bias to infer inner dispositions from observable behaviour.

  2. Free essay

    The psychology of aggression: examining the biological, learning, emotional, and environmental factors that combine ...

    However, a clear link between testosterone and aggressive behaviour has not been found in humans (Brain & Susan, 1997) Bandera (1973, 1977) has suggested that aggressive behaviour is largely learned. It can be learned in two ways - through direct experience or through observational learning.

  1. According to social identity theory individuals hold conceptualisations of the self at both an ...

    Therefore, in- group members will allocate rewards to their own group as a way of enhancing the group's status and creating a distinctive group identity. In line with these assumptions, Spears, Jetten & Scheepers (2001) have provided evidence that indicates that indistinct, minimal groups, as opposed to more meaningful groups,

  2. Outline and evaluate two theories of the cause of aggression

    Social Learning Theory provides a powerful framework into understanding how aggressive behaviour is acquired, instigated and regulated. It offers a theoretical basis into understanding how children learn to behave aggressively from a range of models. The social learning theory has also been the basis into understanding how offenders acquire aggressive

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work