• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research. Non-human animals have been used in psychological research for hundreds of years. With the use of these animals, however, comes the question: "How can on justify the use of non-human animals, who cannot give informed consent, in tests and trials that could cause them both physical and psychological harm?" It is difficult to defend the use of animals in psychological research. The two main sides to the argument take highly differing views. The animal rights movement takes up the position: "No matter the potential harm to mankind, it is ethically wrong to use animals in research." The other side of the argument is held in the utilitarian view that the cost of the research in suffering should be balanced against the benefit to mankind, and that animal research can be justified on that basis. ...read more.

Middle

This was translated on to human children that six months was the limit for comfort deprivation. Although Harlow's Monkeys experiment produced a basically useful result, a case study, 44 Juvenile Thieves, was able to procure similar findings, but simply by looking at past human behaviour. Admittedly case studies are narrow, and the findings somewhat dependent on the researcher maintaining a standard, but they do not require the suffering of non-human animals. On the other side of the argument, the utilitarian argument is firmly fixed in a scientific base. The justification for the use of animals in psychological research is that there have been significant benefits to humans and animals alike. For example, Skinner's Rats experiments have had countless profits in the control and conditioning of maladaptive human behaviours. From the experiments it was found that when behaviour was rewarded, it was repeated, that punishments didn't work, and that negative reinforcement was most effective in removing undesirable behaviours. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, where animal suffering is high, quality of research is low or the certainty of benefit is low and the quality of research is moderate, animal research is precluded without having to take into account the other factors. It is because of the many issues involved in animal research that experimenters use the three Rs system to check that the use of animals is necessary. The Rs stand for Replace, Reduce and Refine. The experimenter must first check that the animal could not be replaced by another form of subject. If animals are necessary then the experimenter must reduce the number of animals used and refine the tests to ensure that the animals are as comfortable as possible. Due to the three Rs and Bateson's Cube, the utilitarian argument is the prevalent and generally accepted one. However, animal rights activists continue to stand up for their ethical and moral objections, and the debate continues. --Alexandra Payne-- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    Classical conditioning (CC)5 focuses on the learning of involuntary emotional or physiological responses, in our case that of fear. Researchers have found it to be a useful model for explaining some of the fears and phobias that people develop. For example, people's fear of snakes can be explained by the fact that snakes (CS)

  2. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    Nor can they talk? But can they suffer?' 13. Singer agrees with Bentham; animals can suffer so should be treated equally. He states suffering must be present before interests can be apparent, so animals must have interests as they can suffer. 14 I believe this is true, although Frey objects, arguing although animals are

  1. The Lion King - Study the opening scenes of the film and describe how ...

    People came from miles around to worship the new king. The lion cub is obviously going to be of great importance throughout the rest of the film. This signifies the birth of the young pretender and shows how important the animals feel towards their new prince.

  2. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    These included topics such as farming issues, knowledge of animal use, whether participants considered there to be alternatives to using animals, the perceived costs and benefits of animal use, physical characteristics of animals, and attitudes and beliefs concerning birds, fish, and farm animals.

  1. Discuss the use of Animals in research and The ethical issues associated with it?

    In connection to research concentrated on the brain Pellow et al (1985, cited in Pinel 2000) studied the effect of anxiety reducing drugs, in an experiment of the defensive behaviour of rats, using the elevated plus shaped maze. Two arms of the maze have sides the other two don't, they

  2. If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How ...

    Their eyes are examined for redness, bleeding, swelling and discharge. Many animals brake their necks as they struggle to escape from the pain. Researchers do not attempt to treat the rabbits after the test. As a result the rabbits suffer and the tests are unlikely to help lead to treatments for potential human injuries'.(SAFE)

  1. Write a speech for a school debate supporting the motion that "Experiments on animals ...

    A: No, because the animals' body is drastically different from ours, so that a safe medicine such as paracetamol and aspirin is deadly to cats and dogs while penicillin kills pigs and hamsters, and some drugs after having being "safe" in the tests prove to be fatal in humans.

  2. Are non-human animals conscious?

    A hairline distinction maybe! But for example, say an autistic child moved a coin placed, by an absent adult, in a red box into a green one. The child would know that the coin began in the red box and is now in the green one, but when asked where the adult will look

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work