• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research. Non-human animals have been used in psychological research for hundreds of years. With the use of these animals, however, comes the question: "How can on justify the use of non-human animals, who cannot give informed consent, in tests and trials that could cause them both physical and psychological harm?" It is difficult to defend the use of animals in psychological research. The two main sides to the argument take highly differing views. The animal rights movement takes up the position: "No matter the potential harm to mankind, it is ethically wrong to use animals in research." The other side of the argument is held in the utilitarian view that the cost of the research in suffering should be balanced against the benefit to mankind, and that animal research can be justified on that basis. ...read more.

Middle

This was translated on to human children that six months was the limit for comfort deprivation. Although Harlow's Monkeys experiment produced a basically useful result, a case study, 44 Juvenile Thieves, was able to procure similar findings, but simply by looking at past human behaviour. Admittedly case studies are narrow, and the findings somewhat dependent on the researcher maintaining a standard, but they do not require the suffering of non-human animals. On the other side of the argument, the utilitarian argument is firmly fixed in a scientific base. The justification for the use of animals in psychological research is that there have been significant benefits to humans and animals alike. For example, Skinner's Rats experiments have had countless profits in the control and conditioning of maladaptive human behaviours. From the experiments it was found that when behaviour was rewarded, it was repeated, that punishments didn't work, and that negative reinforcement was most effective in removing undesirable behaviours. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, where animal suffering is high, quality of research is low or the certainty of benefit is low and the quality of research is moderate, animal research is precluded without having to take into account the other factors. It is because of the many issues involved in animal research that experimenters use the three Rs system to check that the use of animals is necessary. The Rs stand for Replace, Reduce and Refine. The experimenter must first check that the animal could not be replaced by another form of subject. If animals are necessary then the experimenter must reduce the number of animals used and refine the tests to ensure that the animals are as comfortable as possible. Due to the three Rs and Bateson's Cube, the utilitarian argument is the prevalent and generally accepted one. However, animal rights activists continue to stand up for their ethical and moral objections, and the debate continues. --Alexandra Payne-- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. "There is a lot of opposition to the use of non-human animals in psychological ...

    In that sense, the outcome is the greater good for the greatest number. This is the approach taken by utilitarian argument. If the gain (pleasure and happiness) outweighs the pain (suffering) then it is considered ethically acceptable. It is also stated by this argument (Singer)

  2. The Medicinal Potential of the Poison Dart Frog.

    Chlorotoxin is a substance in the venom of the Giant Israeli scorpion; it may offer hope to the thousands suffering glioma, an incurable rapidly spreading form of brain cancer. Chlorotoxin targets glioma cells and blocks their fluid balancing chloride channels, preventing them from shrinking and then migrating to else where in the brain.

  1. Use of non-human animals in psychological research.

    Procedures must be part of approved research/testing programme with a project license and carried out by people with sufficient training. Such licences will only be granted if certain standards are met, e.g. Potential results justify means, minimum number of animals used and research cannot be done using non-human methods.

  2. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    11 Indeed, the early philosopher Jeremy Bentham set the basis for Singer's argument by declaring: "Each to count for one and none for more than one". 12 Thus, we should not take into account their abilities and everyone should be treated equal.

  1. Discuss the use of Animals in research and The ethical issues associated with it?

    In connection to research concentrated on the brain Pellow et al (1985, cited in Pinel 2000) studied the effect of anxiety reducing drugs, in an experiment of the defensive behaviour of rats, using the elevated plus shaped maze. Two arms of the maze have sides the other two don't, they

  2. Discussion of the ethical issues of the use of animals in psychological research.

    In defence of the use of animals; it's important to consider the human suffering that will continue to occur if animals aren't used for research. For instance, with Alzheimer's disease, the benefits of the research will allow for an improved quality of life for those with the condition and those

  1. Are non-human animals conscious?

    A hairline distinction maybe! But for example, say an autistic child moved a coin placed, by an absent adult, in a red box into a green one. The child would know that the coin began in the red box and is now in the green one, but when asked where the adult will look

  2. If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How ...

    tissue damage, side effects, ability to cure illness or lethal dose required to cause death. Some of these tests are last short periods of time and some longer periods. Generally, no anesthetics are used as they may interfere with the test results.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work