• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research.

Extracts from this document...


Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research. Non-human animals have been used in psychological research for hundreds of years. With the use of these animals, however, comes the question: "How can on justify the use of non-human animals, who cannot give informed consent, in tests and trials that could cause them both physical and psychological harm?" It is difficult to defend the use of animals in psychological research. The two main sides to the argument take highly differing views. The animal rights movement takes up the position: "No matter the potential harm to mankind, it is ethically wrong to use animals in research." The other side of the argument is held in the utilitarian view that the cost of the research in suffering should be balanced against the benefit to mankind, and that animal research can be justified on that basis. ...read more.


This was translated on to human children that six months was the limit for comfort deprivation. Although Harlow's Monkeys experiment produced a basically useful result, a case study, 44 Juvenile Thieves, was able to procure similar findings, but simply by looking at past human behaviour. Admittedly case studies are narrow, and the findings somewhat dependent on the researcher maintaining a standard, but they do not require the suffering of non-human animals. On the other side of the argument, the utilitarian argument is firmly fixed in a scientific base. The justification for the use of animals in psychological research is that there have been significant benefits to humans and animals alike. For example, Skinner's Rats experiments have had countless profits in the control and conditioning of maladaptive human behaviours. From the experiments it was found that when behaviour was rewarded, it was repeated, that punishments didn't work, and that negative reinforcement was most effective in removing undesirable behaviours. ...read more.


Also, where animal suffering is high, quality of research is low or the certainty of benefit is low and the quality of research is moderate, animal research is precluded without having to take into account the other factors. It is because of the many issues involved in animal research that experimenters use the three Rs system to check that the use of animals is necessary. The Rs stand for Replace, Reduce and Refine. The experimenter must first check that the animal could not be replaced by another form of subject. If animals are necessary then the experimenter must reduce the number of animals used and refine the tests to ensure that the animals are as comfortable as possible. Due to the three Rs and Bateson's Cube, the utilitarian argument is the prevalent and generally accepted one. However, animal rights activists continue to stand up for their ethical and moral objections, and the debate continues. --Alexandra Payne-- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. The Lion King - Study the opening scenes of the film and describe how ...

    Some time in the future he is about to take on the responsibility of the tribal leader and the dedication shown by his jungle colleagues to be there at the baptism show how important a ceremony this is.

  2. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    Nor can they talk? But can they suffer?' 13. Singer agrees with Bentham; animals can suffer so should be treated equally. He states suffering must be present before interests can be apparent, so animals must have interests as they can suffer. 14 I believe this is true, although Frey objects, arguing although animals are

  1. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    These included topics such as farming issues, knowledge of animal use, whether participants considered there to be alternatives to using animals, the perceived costs and benefits of animal use, physical characteristics of animals, and attitudes and beliefs concerning birds, fish, and farm animals.

  2. If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How ...

    Imagine yourself in a circus stage, wearing a flurry short silly skirt, standing on a stool and getting ready to jump through a hoop covered in flames. Or think of yourself taking part as a horse in the movie "Gladiator".

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    Learning Theory of Alfred Bandura, which holds that learning occurs within a social context. Seligman and Gray (1971) proposed that humans are biologically predisposed or 'prepared' to fear certain animals and to learn certain phobias. Seligman thought that survival threats in evolutionary origins might be the reason for this.

  2. Cloning argument

    Hopefully future scientists and bioengineers will solve this problem. In addition to improving livestock, the agricultural uses for cloning include increasing crop yields. Cloning in plants is much more simple and natural than animal cloning. Humans have been cloning plants for thousands of years by allowing them to self pollinate.

  1. The Medicinal Potential of the Poison Dart Frog.

    For comparisons sake, the pumiliotoxins are often 100 to 1000 times less toxin than their batrachotoxin counterparts (Patocka et al. 1999). The pharmacology of pumiliotoxin B probably involves calcium and sodium dependant processes in nerve and skeletal muscles, however their mechanism is not quite clear.

  2. Animal Rights.

    Research barns and facilities are constantly under the careful watch of animal activists. One mistake could cost years of lawsuits and protests. Animal rights groups in the past have accused many research facilities of cruelty to animals. Clemson's farms are under constant surveillance by Animal Welfare Services and other university sanctioned groups.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work