• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research.

Extracts from this document...


Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research. Non-human animals have been used in psychological research for hundreds of years. With the use of these animals, however, comes the question: "How can on justify the use of non-human animals, who cannot give informed consent, in tests and trials that could cause them both physical and psychological harm?" It is difficult to defend the use of animals in psychological research. The two main sides to the argument take highly differing views. The animal rights movement takes up the position: "No matter the potential harm to mankind, it is ethically wrong to use animals in research." The other side of the argument is held in the utilitarian view that the cost of the research in suffering should be balanced against the benefit to mankind, and that animal research can be justified on that basis. ...read more.


This was translated on to human children that six months was the limit for comfort deprivation. Although Harlow's Monkeys experiment produced a basically useful result, a case study, 44 Juvenile Thieves, was able to procure similar findings, but simply by looking at past human behaviour. Admittedly case studies are narrow, and the findings somewhat dependent on the researcher maintaining a standard, but they do not require the suffering of non-human animals. On the other side of the argument, the utilitarian argument is firmly fixed in a scientific base. The justification for the use of animals in psychological research is that there have been significant benefits to humans and animals alike. For example, Skinner's Rats experiments have had countless profits in the control and conditioning of maladaptive human behaviours. From the experiments it was found that when behaviour was rewarded, it was repeated, that punishments didn't work, and that negative reinforcement was most effective in removing undesirable behaviours. ...read more.


Also, where animal suffering is high, quality of research is low or the certainty of benefit is low and the quality of research is moderate, animal research is precluded without having to take into account the other factors. It is because of the many issues involved in animal research that experimenters use the three Rs system to check that the use of animals is necessary. The Rs stand for Replace, Reduce and Refine. The experimenter must first check that the animal could not be replaced by another form of subject. If animals are necessary then the experimenter must reduce the number of animals used and refine the tests to ensure that the animals are as comfortable as possible. Due to the three Rs and Bateson's Cube, the utilitarian argument is the prevalent and generally accepted one. However, animal rights activists continue to stand up for their ethical and moral objections, and the debate continues. --Alexandra Payne-- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

    were previously associated with a painful bite (UCS), such that individuals become increasingly fearful (CR) of snakes, and possibly everything that reminds the individual of snakes (stimulus generalisation). This may be applied to any other fear/phobia of animals that people might develop.

  2. The Medicinal Potential of the Poison Dart Frog.

    Chlorotoxin is a substance in the venom of the Giant Israeli scorpion; it may offer hope to the thousands suffering glioma, an incurable rapidly spreading form of brain cancer. Chlorotoxin targets glioma cells and blocks their fluid balancing chloride channels, preventing them from shrinking and then migrating to else where in the brain.

  1. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    Method: Design: The Grounded Theory was used to analyse interview transcripts for 17 participants. The interviews were conducted by Sarah Knight: Department of Psychology; University of Portsmouth (2004). The researcher used random sampling to select 5 transcripts for their own interpretation of the data set also using the Grounded Theory.

  2. Discuss the importance of human activities in maintaining the biodiversity of semi-natural ecosystems. Include ...

    Grazed: Persisted as original chalk grassland Clipped: no species were lost, but proportions changed. His experiments showed that management maintained the biodiversity of the grassland. Species richness of much grassland is threatened by succession. The science and art of grassland management is to arrest/ and or harness the succession process

  1. The Lion King - Study the opening scenes of the film and describe how ...

    The camera moves on quickly and then hovers over a large rock, which protrudes out from the cliff face with a lion standing on the top over seeing his domain.

  2. Discussion of the ethical issues of the use of animals in psychological research.

    In defence of the use of animals; it's important to consider the human suffering that will continue to occur if animals aren't used for research. For instance, with Alzheimer's disease, the benefits of the research will allow for an improved quality of life for those with the condition and those

  1. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    direct duties towards animals as they are moral agents, but this direct duty is not enough, as they are still harmed, such as in vivisection. 9 Regan argues animals have a basic moral right to respectful treatment as they have desires and are "subject to life", with an "inherent value" 10.

  2. If you were participating in an experiment, would you object to being deceived? How ...

    Most definitely not all researchers follow their professional Code of Ethics. Unethical examples of research are the Nazi's experiments during the Second World War, the human radiation experiments. Upholding of individual confidentiality and the careful use of non-intrusive, inoffensive and tactful methods may not be completely assured.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work