• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe and evaluate arguments for and against the use of non-human animals in psychological research. Non-human animals have been used in psychological research for hundreds of years. With the use of these animals, however, comes the question: "How can on justify the use of non-human animals, who cannot give informed consent, in tests and trials that could cause them both physical and psychological harm?" It is difficult to defend the use of animals in psychological research. The two main sides to the argument take highly differing views. The animal rights movement takes up the position: "No matter the potential harm to mankind, it is ethically wrong to use animals in research." The other side of the argument is held in the utilitarian view that the cost of the research in suffering should be balanced against the benefit to mankind, and that animal research can be justified on that basis. ...read more.

Middle

This was translated on to human children that six months was the limit for comfort deprivation. Although Harlow's Monkeys experiment produced a basically useful result, a case study, 44 Juvenile Thieves, was able to procure similar findings, but simply by looking at past human behaviour. Admittedly case studies are narrow, and the findings somewhat dependent on the researcher maintaining a standard, but they do not require the suffering of non-human animals. On the other side of the argument, the utilitarian argument is firmly fixed in a scientific base. The justification for the use of animals in psychological research is that there have been significant benefits to humans and animals alike. For example, Skinner's Rats experiments have had countless profits in the control and conditioning of maladaptive human behaviours. From the experiments it was found that when behaviour was rewarded, it was repeated, that punishments didn't work, and that negative reinforcement was most effective in removing undesirable behaviours. ...read more.

Conclusion

Also, where animal suffering is high, quality of research is low or the certainty of benefit is low and the quality of research is moderate, animal research is precluded without having to take into account the other factors. It is because of the many issues involved in animal research that experimenters use the three Rs system to check that the use of animals is necessary. The Rs stand for Replace, Reduce and Refine. The experimenter must first check that the animal could not be replaced by another form of subject. If animals are necessary then the experimenter must reduce the number of animals used and refine the tests to ensure that the animals are as comfortable as possible. Due to the three Rs and Bateson's Cube, the utilitarian argument is the prevalent and generally accepted one. However, animal rights activists continue to stand up for their ethical and moral objections, and the debate continues. --Alexandra Payne-- ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. The Lion King - Study the opening scenes of the film and describe how ...

    Some time in the future he is about to take on the responsibility of the tribal leader and the dedication shown by his jungle colleagues to be there at the baptism show how important a ceremony this is.

  2. Are non-human animals conscious?

    A hairline distinction maybe! But for example, say an autistic child moved a coin placed, by an absent adult, in a red box into a green one. The child would know that the coin began in the red box and is now in the green one, but when asked where the adult will look

  1. Use of non-human animals in psychological research.

    Procedures must be part of approved research/testing programme with a project license and carried out by people with sufficient training. Such licences will only be granted if certain standards are met, e.g. Potential results justify means, minimum number of animals used and research cannot be done using non-human methods.

  2. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    Singer declares equality is 'a moral idea, not an assertion of fact,' that intelligence and other matter of facts have no basis on equality, backing up with use of racism; if equality was based on fact, we could declare coloured people are less equal than white.

  1. Using the Grounded Theory to explore people's views on animal use: What factors influence ...

    Method: Design: The Grounded Theory was used to analyse interview transcripts for 17 participants. The interviews were conducted by Sarah Knight: Department of Psychology; University of Portsmouth (2004). The researcher used random sampling to select 5 transcripts for their own interpretation of the data set also using the Grounded Theory.

  2. Discuss the use of Animals in research and The ethical issues associated with it?

    in the prefrontal lobes. Following this observation Moniz persuaded a neurosurgeon to operate on a series of psychiatric patients and was proved to be a therapeutic success with no side effects. However these findings were generalised on the basis of one desired response displayed by a chimp, and how such

  1. "Is there an important moral difference between human beings and (other) animals?"

    Kant may argue that this moral difference is necessary and correctly placed. Kant believes that only rational and autonomous agents should be bearers of 'moral worth'. In his view, animals are not self governing, self-conscious creatures. They are not 'ends in themselves', but are there only as a 'means to an end', to benefit human beings.

  2. Kin Recognition - Why should animals be able to recognise their kin? Can they? ...

    However when given a choice between their own and alien young, in nest scrapes either side of the original nest, they will unfailingly choose their own throughout the nesting period. (Shugart 1977). In this species, the same results were obtained in egg fostering experiments (Shugart 1987).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work