• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evolution vs. Intelligent Design

Extracts from this document...


Evolution vs. Intelligent Design Intelligent Design and Evolution are two major theories that have been observed in the history of science. Proponents from both sides argue that they use different methodological approaches to back up their theories, which invalidates their opponent's. There are several differences on their understanding of nature including the origin of life, natural selection, and the complexities the evolution. The most incompatible element of this debate is the methodological approach that either side takes in order to explain their understanding of nature. Whether they are really addressing the same issue is completely relative to how tolerant each side is of the other (should I clarify?) Despite their stark differences, both views have permeated the scientific and academic realms and have been accepted as popular theories worldwide. Although evolutionary ideas entertained the minds of ancient philosophers, it wasn't until 19th century when these ideas drew in legendary scientists (ie- Charles Darwin) ...read more.


Conversely, many evolutionists criticize their challengers for not forming their own theories and conducting original research. These perceptual differences of evolution reflect the methodological approach that scientists from both sides take in order to explain their theories. As mentioned earlier, Darwinian evolution has been established with substantial scientific research. Evolutionists do not feel inclined to investigating beyond the material world. They have been universally accepted into secular schools as theories are reaffirmed through advanced studies of DNA; although evolution endured a controversial battle with the American education system. The Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925 is reminiscent of the evolutionary theory's most famous obstacle before receiving approval from many American school systems. When John Scopes, a high school teacher from Tennessee began teaching evolution based on Darwin's book, On the Origin of Species, he was indicted for illegally teaching it (Lewis). Ever since, evolution has been one of the most sensational topics among students, academics, and scientists. ...read more.


The crux of these debates seems to rely on a very rigid dichotomy between accepting evolution or rejecting it, when in fact, proponents of intelligent design vary in the extent of their support of evolution. There may be some I.D. proponents that believe the whole theory of evolution is heretic and many who at least support at least the very basic tenets of evolution. On the other hand, many evolutionists often overlook the fact that some I.D. proponents do in fact support evolution, even natural selection. It is under the notion, however, that even the randomness of mutation, itself, is designed and controlled by a superior being. Such varied beliefs among I.D. proponents make it very difficult for scientists to have an objective debate. Scientists cannot debate unless they clearly understand who they are arguing with. Relativism is observed when proponents of intelligent design do not accept the notion of natural selection and that the complexities of evolution can solely be explained by an intelligent cause. Otherwise, scientists are not really addressing the same questions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Genetics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

This is a difficult topic to handle objectively, but even so this essay has done a poor attempt of remaining logical and scientific.

The most important point to make in this essay is about methodology. The student has realised this, but then not really made the point very well. It doesn't matter to most scientists to what greater or lesser degree proponents of ID agree with evolution. The bone of contention is that wherever ID is used to patch a perceived 'crack' in evolutionary theory, this cannot be tested. It is not falsifiable. This is a really key point for scientists, because all scientific theories must make falsifiable predictions. There is also a dearth of scientific reading associated with this essay. It looks as though the student has done his best to answer the question based on his own experiences, and then looked up a couple of citations to back it up. There has been no real reading about the debate: no examples of discourse, and no real statistics about the number of scientists believing in Intelligent Design, which I believe the student has mentally inflated somewhat.

Overall, this is a rather disappointing essay, and would score 3/5.

Marked by teacher Rebecca Lewis 24/09/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Genetics essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Nucleic acid, DNA replication and Protein Synthesis

    3 star(s)

    PROTEIN SYNTHESIS Protein synthesis involves the transfer of the coded information from the nucleus to the cytoplasm (transcription) and the conversion of that information into polypeptides on the ribosome's (translation). Transcription Transcription occurs in the nucleus. The enzyme RNA-polymerase becomes attached to the double helix of the DNA in the region of the gene that is being expressed.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using DNA sequence data for assessing relationships ...

    Doyle and Donoghue [1] whilst studying the role the Gnetales play in macroevolution stated that with slightly different characters, the relative parsimony of the two arrangements (referring to the nesting of Gnetales near the Angiosperms or the Coniferopsids) could of easily been reversed.

  1. Forensic Science and DNA in Crime Solving

    Every state now has a database, and all offenders convicted of violent and/or sexual crimes are required to submit to a DNA sample recovery. This allows investigators to obtain a DNA sample from a crime scene and feed it into the database to determine if it matches any known offenders.

  2. Using DNA to Solve Crimes.

    In addition, these labs may be ill-equipped to handle the increasing influx of DNA samples and evidence. The problems of backlogs and lack of up-to-date technology result in significant delays in the administration of justice. (3) More research is needed to develop faster methods for analysing DNA evidence. (4)

  1. DNA Fingerprinting: A review of the criticisms of DNA evidence. Is it really the ...

    The increasing police power to retain DNA samples has become today ever greater since the establishment of the National DNA Database in 1995. In some occasions the admissibility of DNA evidence was challenged either because it was retained unlawfully or because it was in conflict with civil liberties.


    Immunoassay: This is an analytical method in which antibodies are used to detect specific molecules. Isomerases: Enzymes that catalyse intramolecular reactions. Laccase: A polyphenol oxidase from fungi. This enzyme can use oxygen to oxidise different types of aromatic molecules and to form lignin type of aromatic polymers from phenolic compounds.

  1. The Genetic Code

    The two new DNA molecules are identical to each other and to the original DNA and the new-formed DNA molecule contains one of the original polynucleotide strands; therefore this is called semi-conservative replication. Protein synthesis is the process, which produces the proteins, which make up the Genetic Code, and this consists of two processes, which are transcription and translation.

  2. Separation of serum proteins and enzymes bypolyacrylamide gelelectrophoresis (PAGE)

    A zwitterion is an amino acid which contains both negatively charged and positively charged groups (see fig. 2.) As they are electrically neutral there is no migration in an electric field. Fig 2. A Zwitterion The pI is calculated by averaging pk' values in two functional groups that react as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work