• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Investigating the nature of children's scientific reasoning: cognitive structures, conflict and scaffolding.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Investigating the nature of children's scientific reasoning: cognitive structures, conflict and scaffolding. Abstract. This is an account of a study on the nature of children's scientific understanding of the concepts of floating and sinking, and the role of cognitive challenge and scaffolding in supporting conceptual change. The procedure involved the analysis of video-recorded interviews conducted with two female participants of different age. Results showed that, while the younger participant's reasoning was confined to her concrete experience, the older participant developed a more sophisticated understanding of scientific concepts, which is consistent with Piaget's argument that scientific reasoning requires the development of specific cognitive structures. Moreover, the older participant demonstrated conceptual change when faced with conflicting evidence, and her progresses were supported by scaffolded discussion. On the other hand, the cognitive challenge did not spurred a real qualitative cognitive change in the younger participant. Moreover, she seemed to benefit less from adult guidance and displayed a less clear progress in her reasoning, in contrast with Vygotsky and Wood's predictions. Introduction. The ability to think about the world in terms of symbolic representations is an essential pre-requisite for understanding mathematical and scientific principles. According to Inhelder and Piaget (1958), it is only in the latter stage of cognitive development, known as formal operation stage, that children develop abstract thinking and their understanding of the world becomes less constrained by their concrete experience of the world. Scientific reasoning is linked to development of related cognitive structures and, as argued by Piaget, conceptual change is triggered by the conflict between children's current thinking and the actual evidence, which forces them to adjust their reasoning in the course of a process known as equilibration. A teaching approach known as discovery learning places major emphasis on the role of the teacher in challenging and stimulating children's reasoning with contrasting evidence. Selley (1993) supported the idea that children's understanding of scientific concepts develops through stages, and argued that teachers should encourage children in formulating their own explanations and hypothesis in the light of the evidence available to them, suggesting correlations and stimulating their reasoning. ...read more.

Middle

Rather than demonstrating a qualitative change in her thinking, she seemed to opt for an alternative explanation that could fit the actual evidence. On the other hand, Jessica's conceptual change is marked by the introduction of two new causal themes, those of Shape and Density. While her grasp of complex concepts is still uncertain (especially that of density), the boat effect and Archimede's principle are both indicated by Shelley as more sophisticated scientific reasoning on why things float or sink. Jessica's responses suggested a better understanding of scientific concepts, which could be explained in terms of both developed cognitive abilities and the effects of the cognitive challenge. Again, this is consistent with Piaget's predictions. Jessica's conceptual change is further strengthened in the latter part of the investigation: unlike Emily, she developed her reasoning by shifting from explanations based on materials to explanations based on shape. For instance, while in stage 6-7 both children argued that candles floated because they were made out of the same material, wax, after the scaffolded discussion Jessica reasoned that candles floated because they were shaped ?like a log? and were ?a bit curvy?. Similarly, while Emily tended to generalise the knowledge that objects in which water couldn't get in would float in an inconsistent way (she argued that the rubber and the elastic band got wet) to fit the evidence with her current hypothesis, Jessica displayed a progress towards a more complex scientific reasoning. While these findings supported the idea that collaborative working with adults is beneficial for cognitive development, Emily's lack of progresses in her scientific reasoning, by contrast, conflicted with Vygotsky's notion of zone of proximal development. Emily seemed unable to achieve a richer understanding of floating and sinking despite being assisted by an adult. Unlike Jessica, she took little benefit from her engagement with the experimenter, and this suggests a potential methodological problem with this study. ...read more.

Conclusion

Natalia also asks them why they think the object will float or sink. * Stage 3: testing the predictions. One by one the objects are placed in a tank of water and the child is asked to comment on what has happened. 1. Part B: assessing the participant?s initial understanding with light objects that sink and heavy objects that float * Stage 4: examining the objects. The child is presented with 10 objects. * Stage 5: predicting what will happen and why. The child is asked to make a prediction about whether each object will float or sink. Natalia also asks them why they think the object will float or sink. * Stage 6: testing the predictions. One by one the objects are placed in a tank of water and the child is asked to comment on what has happened. It is likely that some of the children?s predictions here will not be confirmed. Natalia asks them to explain this result and may begin a ?Stage 7? type discussion for an object. 1. Part C: developing children?s understanding * Stage 7: a Piagetian approach ? inducing cognitive conflict. Natalia draws to the child?s attention examples where their explanations are inconsistent and demonstrate an incomplete understanding. For example, a child who states that ?heavy things sink? may be asked to consider the heavy wood block, which floats, and the light needle, which sinks. This stage finishes with the child identifying the objects that floated and being asked to explain why all the items in this group floated. This is repeated for the objects that sank. * Stage 8: scaffolding children?s thinking. Natalia engages in a further discussion with the child (scales are used if the child has used the concept of weight in their explanations) in an attempt to help the child to take account of both size and weight, and to develop a more adequate (albeit incomplete) explanatory concept. * Stage 9: re-assessing the child?s understanding. Finally, the child is asked to explain why the objects that float and sink behave as they do. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Compare and contrast Piaget's and Vygotsky's views of cognitive development.

    3 star(s)

    tasks a child can perform with help from a skilled individual and not yet on their own, functions that have not yet been matured. Vygotsky suggested that this promoted cognitive growth because a child has to work out a problem orally and in turn it is stored better in the memory.

  2. Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview.

    Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 127-140. Carver, C. S. (1994). Personality and adult attachment. Unpublished manuscript, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL. Collins, N. L., & Read., S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. (1992).

  1. Student number: 0373390

    such as reading are being attained by much younger ages than previously as a result of earlier teaching methods (Bryne et al, 2002). Studies carried out by Pueschel and Hopmann (1993), Farrell and Elkins (1995) and Bryne et al (2002)

  2. Care and Service Planning for Children.

    "Distress caused by separation, is likely to be greater if the child is between 6-7 months and 3 years old, reaching a peak between 12-18 months," (Maccoby, 1980, quoted in Gross, 1991,p.658). One of the crucial variables linked with age, is the ability to hold in the mind an image of the absent mother.

  1. A qualitative study exploring how adult perceptions of significant others in their lives have ...

    background [line 33], significance of parental roles [lines 20-25] and responsibility of the eldest sibling [lines 50-55]: '... the father would be the first person that you would seek guidance from, he'd be your spiritual leader... ' [lines 24-25] These male dominated influences still permeated his life regarding roles and

  2. To what extent can cognitive development be understood in terms of the specialisation of ...

    This specialisation of information processing is complex. Many psychologists believe that these processes happen in response with the neural system's dynamic interaction with the environment and the brain has process of self-organisation (Keslo 1995). Initially the development of the brain's neural systems are random and undifferentiated and become more specialised over time.

  1. An investigation into the Early Development of Identity. This investigation is based on ...

    Children tend to rely on others as the reference points for judging themselves; and as knowledge shifts with age they are more inclined to answer independently. Rosenberg found LSK parallels with the shift from physical to psychological self-descriptions in his main study.

  2. A comparative, semi structured interview from two female participants, and how their age gap ...

    would use more inner qualities and state more about relationships and their character. Rosenberg explored one further aspect of self- development. He was interested in what he called the ?locus of self-knowledge?. This is about how far children have developed an independent, self-reflective sense of self, separate from others (notably parents or other attachment figures), (Open University, 2011).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work