Mast Cell Degranulation Practical

Authors Avatar by isse0477500 (student)

Mast Cell Degranulation Practical

1.        I can observe from the class results that the untreated cells (The control group) had highest percentage of cells that gave a degranulation score of 0 (53.62) when compared to cells that have been treated with 48/80 (23.68), SCG (48.08) and Salbutamol (36.48). I did predict that the control cells would have had a score higher than those treated with 48/80 but I expected the cells treated with SCG and Salbutamol to have a higher percentage of cells that gave a score of 0 compared to the control. After having done research, I found out that there are endogenous factors that also cause degranulation and treating the cells with SCG or Salbutamol would not inhibit this process that has already started (Shen, W. & Louie, S. G. 1999). Therefore after careful observation, I can clearly see that there is not much difference between the control and the cells treated with SCG or Salbutamol. The cells that gave the highest percentage for degranulation score ++ was the 48/80 treated cells (39.53) and they gave a percentage of 36.79 for partial degranulation. This was also expected since the polymer 48/80 triggers degranulation in mast cells.

Join now!

2.        The class results agree with my prediction to an extent as I predicted that when 48/80 and SCG were added to the cells, then there would be a higher percentage of cells with degranulation score of 0 and lower percentage of cells with degranulation score of ++ when compared with 48/80 treated cells. It did not however agree with my prediction regarding the percentage of partially degranulated cell, since the percentage the class recorded was higher than that of the non-degranulated cells. I believe this is mainly due to human error in determining which cells are degranulated and those ...

This is a preview of the whole essay