Kluft (1997) deals with real experiences of memories being lost whether by abuse or psychological disarray such as Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) or Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) . Kluft (1997) and Loftus (1997) are comparing totally different subjects as locking away in the subconscious something that is appalling has little to do with coaxing people to agree with false memories of being lost in a shopping mall. Loftus does state that under the right circumstances, false memories can be installed rather effortlessly in some people.
Kluft (1997) states that with respect to the research by Loftus a fact has received little attention is that only a small minority of the subjects who received misdirection cues took the indicated misdirection and most did not. Kluft (1997) states the research of Loftus might be cited as evidence that most people, even those subjected to an intense campaign to distort their memories and induce confabulations, will disallow such suggestions
Because Loftus can generate counterfeit memories does not discount the probability that repressed memories do exist and Kluft’s reasoning is based not on shallow inferences as those forwarded by Loftus but, as Kluft stated, on hundreds of examples of definite recovered memories. These memories Kluft (1997) refers to were not only corroborated through third parties but the whole research was done with more objectivity than that of Loftus.
Loftus (1997) states that people can recover memories that have long been made unavailable and yet argues some mental health professionals encourage patients to imagine childhood events as a way of recovering these supposedly hidden memories. Loftus(1997) correctly refers to memory distortion and points out the effect of misinformation and source confusion and the ease in which memories can be customized and therefore deformed over a point in time but this does not exclude the fact there may be repressed memories. Loftus (1997) attempts to confuse the definitions of traumatic experiences and research phenomena which seeks to copy repressed memories.
The whole question has to be examined of what other explanations account for these “repressed memories” and indeed far more convincing studies have been undertaken about what process is going on in the subconscious minds of victims of sexual abuse. Firstly though what does what does memory consist of should be examined..
Memory consists of 1) registering or encoding which is in fact the process of receipt, processing and combining of received information 2) storage or formation of an enduring trace of the encoded information 3) Recall or retrieval or remembrance which is calling back the stored information in response to some prompt.(Baddeley, Eysenck & Anderson, 2009 p. 27, p 44-59).
There are three main types of memory recall: cued recollection , free recollection and serial recollection and therapists and clinicians study these forms of recall as a way to study the memory processes of humans but false memories result from relentless beliefs, suggestions by authority figures, or accounts of phoney information and recurring contact to these stimuli influence the reorganization of an individuals memory, disturbing the recorded particulars, or implanting vivid bogus accounts of an incident (Steffens and Mecklenbräuker 2007 p.12-24).
Freyd (1994, p.312) stated there is corroboration that the most shattering psychological effects of child abuse occur when the victims are abused by a trusted person who was known to them and that the child abuse is especially likely to produce a social conflict or betrayal for the abused child. Freyd (1994, p.312) stated if a child processed the betrayal of the trusted person in the usual way, he or she would be moved to stop interacting with the child abuser betrayer. Freyd goes on to explain that the victim instead needs to ignore the betrayal and if the child abuser is a primary caregiver it is fundamental that the child keeps behaving in such a way that will encourage continued attachment and Freyd explains that for the child to withdraw from a primary caregiver on which child is dependent would endanger the child's life both physically and mentally and thus the ordeal of child abuse by its very nature necessitates that the information about the abuse be blocked from mental mechanisms that control attachment and attachment behaviour. Freyd (1994, p.312) states the information that gets blocked may be partial blocking such as blocking emotional responses only but that in the majority of many cases partial blocking will lead to a more profound amnesia of the events
Briere and Conte (1993) addressed the problem of self-reported amnesia for abuse in adults molested as children. Briere and Conte (1993) used a sample of 450 adult clinical subjects reporting sexual abuse histories and a total of 267 subjects (59.3%) identified some period in their lives, before age 18, when they had no memory of their abuse. Briere and Conte (1993) stated that variables most predictive of abuse-related amnesia were greater current psychological symptoms, molestation at an early age, extended abuse, and variables such as victimization by multiple perpetrators reflecting especially violent abuse and victim fears of death if she or he disclosed the abuse to others. Briere and Conte(1993) stated that abuse characteristics more likely to produce psychological conflict such as enjoyment of the abuse, acceptance of bribes, feelings of guilt or shame were not connected with abuse-related amnesia. The results of this study were interpreted as supporting theories of post-traumatic stress disorder
Feldman-Summers & Pope (1994) stated a national sample of psychologists were asked whether they had been abused as children and whether they had ever forgotten some or all of the abuse. Nearly a quarter of the sample (23.9%) reported childhood abuse and approximately 40% of those reported a period of forgetting some or all of the abuse. Feldman-Summers & Pope (1994) stated that (a) both sexual and nonsexual abuse persons were subject to periods of forgetting; (b) the most commonly reported factor related to recall was being in therapy; (c) approximately one half of those who reported forgetting also reported authentication of the abuse; and (d) persons who reported forgetting stated it was not related to gender or age of the respondent but it was related to severity of the abuse.
Brewin & Andrews (1998 p.966). state that statistics and data currently available do not allow any of the four explanations of repression, dissociation, ordinary forgetting and false memory to be rejected and strongly support the likelihood that some recovered memories correspond to actual experiences. Brewin & Andrews (1998 p.966) state that although repression and dissociation have proved helpful in forwarding the idea of defensive strategies for forgetting trauma they argue that neither is sufficient to explain recovered memories of trauma. Brewin & Andrews (1998 p.966) state that use of the terms repression and repressed memories has led to confusion because the terms can be defined in very different ways and that dissociation although often concurrent with traumatic amnesia is associated with alterations in consciousness rather than exclusively with forgetting
Brewin & Andrews (1998 p.966) argue that a satisfactory account of recovered memories of trauma must explain the large variations both in the degree of the former amnesia and in the quality of the memories recovered. Brewin & Andrews (1998 p.966) state that these differences may be understandable in terms of three processes familiar to cognitive psychologists and these are retrieval inhibition, post-retrieval decisional processes and implicit memory. They also state that fundamental to the clarification is the idea that there are dual representations of trauma in memory one being explicit and deliberately accessible which is verbally accessible memory and another which is involuntarily activated by situational cues (Brewin & Andrews 1998 p.966).
Hopper ( 2008) states that amnesia for childhood sexual abuse is a condition of whose existence is beyond dispute and that most people never report sexual abuse and a late report is earlier than never. Hopper confirms that people wait to report abuse because of the shame or guilty feelings that sexual abuse normally causes and amnesia or traumatic dissociation prevents people from exposing the abuse because they do not remember the abuse until many years later
Hopper ( 2008) states that repressed memories is merely one explanation for what causes the condition of amnesia and the term repressed memories is often a confusing and misleading and misunderstood term. At least 10% of people sexually abused in childhood will have periods of complete amnesia of their abuse followed by occurrences of postponed recall (Hopper 2008).
According to Faulkner (1996) sexually-abused children testify to feelings that something is wrong with them, that the abuse is their own fault, and that they should fault themselves for the abuse and many children encounter disbelief or dismissal of their claims and consequently victims may feel inadequate, guilty, shameful and powerless For these reasons, many people suppress what they see as a disgraceful secret until later in life (Faulkner1996).
Schacter (1996, p . 271) states that RMT uses a range of methods that include , group therapy, visualization, and to assist the patient in remembering the traumatic event. Among these methods hypnosis is risky because it is easy to lead and encourage the patient by suggestive or leading questions, trance writing has never been proven to have any therapeutic value and group therapy can become communal reinforcement of delusions if the clinician is not cautious (Schacter 1996, p. 271). Each of these different methods set out above has been very successful in getting patients to remember many things of which they were unaware before therapy and these include not just memories of being sexually abused as children, but of being for sexual experimentation, being required to participate in , or being traumatized in a . These cases and are not scientifically reliable (Schacter 1996, p 267)..
Brown , a psychologist in the forefront of RMT, and quoted by Hallinan states on the other hand that fantastic memories are perhaps coded or symbolic versions of what really happened but the importance of this is that the alleged memories are of hideous descriptions and are destructive of those who peoples' lives who recount the descriptions. (Hallinan 1997)
Works on child abuse promoting such a notion have been very popular among therapists and talk show hosts that include Ellen Bass and Laura Davis who wrote The Courage to Heal: A Guide for Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse (first published in 1988,) Wendy Maltz, Beverly Holman, Beverly Engel, Mary Jane Williams and E. Sue Blume. Through many empirically unsupported notions, including the claim that about half of all women have been sexually abused, get treated as facts by many of those just mentioned above according to Tavris (1993); The authors of The Courage to Heal are feminist activists, Ellen Bass is a poet and creative writing teacher and Laura Davis an incest survivor and neither Bass nor Davis have any training in or and they state that nothing in the book is based on any psychological theory (Tavris 1993).
Memory researcher Loftus (1980) states that a young woman who is sexually attracted to her father may try to repress her disconcerting incestuous wishes but her behaviour may indicate that these desires are not completely forgotten and the woman may break or grope for words when discussing some things about her father and she may show other signs of anxiety such as perspiration or blushing but this does not mean by any means whatsoever that there was any sexual abuse
(2008) professor of psychiatry at describes the book The Courage to Heal: A Guide for Women Survivors of Child Sexual Abuse as the bible of inept therapists. (2008) states that in the mid-1990s, some clinicians and therapists seemed to not recall the Hippocratic Oath as they oversaw a plague of grave and shattering allegations of childhood sexual abuse and satanic cult worship. McHugh (2008) argues that often with no proof to support them clinicians and therapists would advise suggestive treatments that dredged up fake memories and multiple personalities, separated daughter from father, sent innocent men to jail and caused extensive monetary and social ruin. McHugh (2008) points out that psychiatry is commencing to replicate its mistakes and both the public and the medical community should pay consideration as to why things went so shockingly awry 15 years ago. McHugh (2008) states the whole theory of repressed memories did great damage to psychiatry’s repute in that some of the most illustrious institutions in the USA could fall into this ambush and malign good families out of a non- proven hypothesis about psychiatric matters. McHugh (2008) continues that that reason it did great harm to psychiatry’s reputation was the fact that the discipline itself did not correct this non- proven hypothesis and its practice continued until there were major lawsuits in the USA so that the courts rather than the psychiatric profession put an end to the repressed memory theory.
In conclusion, traumatic amnesia seems to the logical and scientifically proven cause of
many retrieved memories and not as such by “repressed memories” because the major problem with "repressed memories" is the term itself as the term has numerous definitions all of which have been misused and abused
References
Albach, F. and Moormann P. P. and Bermond B. (1996). Memory recovery of childhood sexual abuse. Dissociation 9 (4) (December-1996).: pp. 261–273
Averbach, E., & Sperling, G. (1961). Short term storage of information in vision. In C. Cherry (Ed.), Information Theory (pp. 196-211).Butterworth. London
Baddeley, A. D. (1966). "The influence of acoustic and on long-term memory for word sequences". Quart. J. Exp. Psychol 18: pp. 302–309.
Baddeley, A., Eysenck, M.W., & Anderson, M.C. (2009). Memory. Psychology Press. London pp. 27, p 44-59
Brewin, C. R., & Andrews, B. (1998). Recovered memories of trauma: Phenomenology and cognitive mechanisms. Clinical Psychology Review, 4, pp. 949-970.
Briere, J., & Conte, J. (1993). Self-reported amnesia for abuse in adults molested as children. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, pp. 21-31.
Faulkner, N. (1996). Pandora's box: The secrecy of child sexual abuse. Sexual Counseling Digest, 1996. pp. 1-3
Feldman-Summers, S. & Pope, K. S. (1994). The experience of "forgetting" childhood abuse: A national survey of psychologists Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, pp. 636-639
Freyd, J. (1994). Betrayal trauma: Traumatic amnesia as an adaptive response to childhood abuse. Ethics & Behavior, 4, pp. 307-329.
Gay, P. (1988). Freud: A Life for Our Time, Norton Press , 500 Fifth Avenue
New York pp. 92-94.
Hallinan, J. T. (1997) "Money for repressed memories repressed," Sacramento Bee, Jan. 12, 1997, Forum.
Hopper, J. (2008)—Recovered memories of Sexual Abuse ---Zur Institute Publications---Sonoma Medical Plaza, 181 Andrieux Street, Suite 212, Sonoma, CA, USA
Kluft, R. P. (1997). The argument for the reality of delayed recall of trauma. In P.S.
Appelbaum, L. A. Uyehara,& M. R. Elin (Eds.), Trauma and memory: Clinical and legal controversies (no pagination in the reprinted copy). New York: Oxford University Press.
Loftus, E.F. (1980). Memory Addison-Wesley. (Reprinted by: Ardsley Press, NY 1988).
Loftus, E. (1997) Creating False Memories Scientific American September 1997, vol 277 number 3 (no pagination in the reprinted copy).
(2008). Try to Remember: Psychiatry's Clash over Meaning, Memory, and Mind.: Dana Press. New York pp. 252.
Niolon R. (1999) Defenses .Resources for Students and Professionals Journal December 1999
Pettus, A. ( 2008) Repressed Memory Harvard Magazine January- February 2008
Sperling, G. (1963). A model for visual memory tasks. Human Factors, 5, pp. 19-31.
Steffens, M. C., & Mecklenbräuker, S. (2007). False memories: Phenomena, theories, and implications. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 215(1), pp. 12-24.
Tavris, C. (1993). Beware the incest-survivor machine [Essay on popular books on recovered memory]. New York Times Book Review, (1993, January 3).
Zur O (2007) APA Books. 750 First Street NE, Washington DC.
