• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19
  20. 20
  21. 21
  22. 22
  23. 23
  24. 24
  25. 25
  26. 26
  27. 27
  28. 28
  29. 29
  30. 30
  31. 31

This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals.

Extracts from this document...


CONTENTS Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Literature review 3 * Fear 3 * Learning 3 * Previous Research and Studies 4 * A Cognitive Approach 5 * Treatment of Phobias 6 Hypothesis 7 Method 9 * Materials and Apparatus 9 * Subjects 9 * Design 10 Results 12 * Nonparametric Correlations 12 * Partial Correlation Coefficients 12 * Reporting the Results 12 Discussion 16 * An explanation of how well our data fit our original hypothesis 16 * An explanation of whether the data supports or compliments previous research. 16 * A statement of our conclusions 17 * A discussion of the practical and theoretical implications of the results 18 * Limitations of the research 18 * Suggestions for future research in this area 19 * An overall conclusion 20 References 21 Appendices * Appendix 1 - Questionnaires 22 * Appendix 2 - Values 26 * Appendix 3 - Scattergrams 28 ABSTRACT This study attempts to explore the basis of people's fear of animals. Specifically, it seeks to explore the views of 126 individuals, with a majority of Maltese and a minority of foreigners. This study adopts a quantitative methodology. Data is gathered using questionnaire surveys assigned to each individual. Analysis of data uses spearman's Rho correlation and a first-order partial correlation derived from Guilford and Fruchter. Data derived shows a strong positive correlation between perceived fear and perceived strangeness. To conclude, the results may be bringing out the fact that the appearance of the different animals is the strongest factor relating to the fear of them. INTRODUCTION Our study regarding the fear of small animals is a replica of the original study conducted by Bennett-Levy and Marteau; who showed that a correlation existed between people's fear of some small animals and the animal's physical form. Their findings indicate that the more they differ from the human figure, the more fear they are likely to evoke. ...read more.


To measure the way individuals perceived the animal characteristics mentioned above (i.e. fear, harmfulness, strangeness), they were told to circle one of the three responses; that which most closely corresponded to their feelings. In order to assess the third hypothesis directly (predicted positive correlation between perceived fear and strangeness), perceived harmfulness was controlled for. This was done in the following two ways: 1. Removing each of the animals and insects having an average harmfulness rating of two or more, and 2. Carrying out a first order partial correlation. Procedure Within this research, a variety of animals were investigated on the three above mentioned variables. Subjects had to assess the animals and insects on all three, therefore stating how afraid, harmful, or "ugly" (for strangeness) each and every animal is. This was done to compare with the original study of Bennett-Levy and Marteau. Since one rating of a questionnaire might have had an effect on the following one, questionnaires were given out in six different orders to cancel out the bias. Since our sample was that of 126 subjects, this counterbalance was possible. The order of presentation can be seen below: Subject no. First Second Third 1 Strangeness Fear Harmfulness 2 Strangeness Harmfulness Fear 3 Fear Strangeness Harmfulness 4 Harmfulness Strangeness Fear 5 Fear Harmfulness Strangeness 6 Harmfulness Fear Strangeness All members of the research team carried out the data collections. The questionnaires were administered in various settings, and at various times. Subjects were thanked before filling in the questionnaire, and were told that there was no right or wrong answer. They were also informed to circle the first characteristic that came to mind, when associating it with the animal in question. They were told that they could fill them in at their own time and pace; in addition to the fact that their name will not be used, and that the results would be confidential. ...read more.


5. Since questionnaires were only constructed in English, foreigners taking the questionnaire might have had problems in understanding what some animals really were, thus leaving them confused about the nature of the animal. This may have resulted in them just circling an answer for the sake of not leaving out anything, thus not representing their true emotions. 6. The individuals' mood may have affected the way they responded. Questionnaires were handed out one after the other, without time intervals between them, thus the individuals mood was stable across all three. Suggestions for future research in this area After reviewing our work and bearing in mind the limitations it brought about, our team acknowledges that the matter researched could be looked at in much more breath and depth and from many different angles. Unfortunately we didn't have the resources and experience needed to investigate further. Maybe future researches interested in the matter could do more. Here are some of our suggestions: * Instead of administering questioners, examining the animals "in vivo" may be another possibilty. For example you could put participants in a room with the animal in question and take notes of reactions; * Additional research could be done with people living in the country or more rural environments compared to inner city inhabitants; * A pretest, followed by an intensive educational course about the animal(s) in questions should be carried out, after which one may compare the results with the posttest; * Explore the phenomenon of Steve Irwin, Jeff Corbin, or any other animal lover capable of holding just about anything in their hands, and find out what exactly makes them immune to animal phobias. An overall conclusion After viewing our results, we came to the conclusion that individuals fear animals to different degrees. Therefore we think that animal phobias are more likely to be learnt; however we are not ruling out the possibility of it being innate. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Zoology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Zoology essays

  1. Is there an important moral difference between human beings and animals

    Some plants may feel." 24 Another argument which arises from this is difference between pain and suffering. Singer declares because of their 'superior mental powers' humans can suffer more than animals: 'A human dying from cancer is likely to suffer more than a mouse' 25, as a mouse does not know what it has, whereas a human does.

  2. Ethics In Psychology

    Another benefit is that using animals can help people to understand the behaviour of animals better. For example, research was carried out to look at animals that damage crops. This research led to more effective scarecrows and in turn limited more unpleasant methods of crop protection such as poison.

  1. The Lion King - Study the opening scenes of the film and describe how ...

    The song 'Circle of Life,' starts with the words "Arrival of the new born," being sung. The urgency to arrive at their destination picks up tempo, the animals are now moving quickly, there is a great importance to move ahead.

  2. Compare and Contrast two of the five main approaches in psychology.

    Thorndike repeated it many times, whilst he timed the cat. He had concluded that the cat learned how to get out of the box through rewards. This links to why behaviourists are also known as 'learning theorists'. Humanists believe that we as in humans self-actualise in stages.

  1. Are non-human animals conscious?

    In other words, the consciousness of an object may not be fully discernible to an observer, but it is the product of physical processes, i.e. it is a physical phenomenon. And therefore it can, and should, be investigated by science.

  2. Free essay

    Explain, using evolutionary arguments, why social living is common among mammals

    Deliberate or not, it could be argued that all human behaviour related to relationships is performed with the anticipation of the repercussions that may arise. Selfish acts are of course also in concordance to the evolutionary concept of personal fitness and natural selection.

  1. Free essay

    A review of a case study on feline aggression and possible treatments

    The two most prevalent behaviours, indoor marking and aggression, are both normal feline behaviours; however they are considered undesirable in human society and can implement animal welfare. 2.2 Inter-cat Aggression It is the two most prevalent behaviours highlighted in figure 2.1 that Mrs Chapman is facing with her neutered, male cat Ted.

  2. Compare and contrast the ways different animals respond to osmotic challenges

    It functions on the filtration-reabsorption principle with tubular secretion (Schmidt-Nielson, 1997). High blood pressure forces fluid and small particles from the capillaries into the Bowman?s capsule, resulting in ultrafiltration. The majority of the resulting filtrate is reabsorbed back into the bloodstream in the proximal tubule, Loop of Henle and distal convoluted tubule and connecting duct.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work