"Variable forms are difficult to acquire". Discuss Until the late 1960's it was still the largely subscribed view that children's language acquisition was, on the main part, innate and occurred independently

Authors Avatar

“Variable forms are difficult to acquire”. Discuss

Until the late 1960’s it was still the largely subscribed view that children’s language acquisition was, on the main part, innate and occurred independently from the social context and surroundings in which the child was brought up. However there have been movements in recent years to account for the effects that parents and other caregivers have on the linguistic development of a child (Romaine, 1986: 159). This paper intends to briefly look at the standard accepted view of acquisition of variation; the variationist view, which considers the social context; and to place these viewpoints into a current frame of reference by examining some contemporary studies. It intends to examine the studies in relation to acquisition of variable forms in early childhood and in adolescence.

The mainstream view of acquisition of variation is that during the early years of childhood, the main period of acquisition, most of the linguistic input comes from the primary care givers, i.e. the mother and father. For this reason “motherese” has long been the main focus of first language acquisition studies (Kerswill, 1996:181). The conventional view of first language acquisition is that during the first year of life a child will gain control over their speech organs and begin to acquire speech patterns. About the time a child reaches his first birthday he begins to understand and produce words in isolation. Typically these words are to do with the child’s immediate environment: objects including food, clothing, people and toy items; there are also words denoting actions or motions such as “peek-a-boo” and “open”; lastly there are word used in social interaction including “yes”, “no”, “hi” etc. At around 18 months a child’s vocabulary expands dramatically and they begin to form two word strings. These are generally very basic explanations of the world around them. They explain objects or people appearing or disappearing or moving about; owners and properties of things; they comment on people doing or seeing things and ask about who what and where. After this children progress to three word strings and between the ages of two and a half and three and a half children’s language develops so as to allow for fluent grammatical conversations (Pinker). In general the standard view of variation in language acquisition is that because children are aiming for the perfect grammar i.e. one that isn’t variable, they sporadically omit elements and grammatical forms from their speech in their attempt to use the correct variant. The standardized view of language acquisition is that, as previously mentioned, the main input for the child’s learning is the speech of the mother. So it was presumed that mothers adapted their speech to eliminate variation, which was seen as “noise”, so that they provided the child with “a simpler, cleaner corpus from which to learn language” (Snow, 1995:180). The variationist view of acquisition differs in that it shows that mothers switch between dialectal and standard forms when talking to children. They do it frequently and subconsciously according to whom they are speaking with and the social situation.

Join now!

The variationist view allows children to see when and where variant forms are appropriate, because their parents use them in the correct place, and so the children learn to switch between standard and dialectal forms in the same way as their primary care givers. The children are exhibiting “a clear link between the adult and the child features” where “the child can be seen attempting to approximate the adult model” (Kerswill,1996:188). This view is very different from the standard; children are using variant dialectal forms because they are aiming for the correct, standard, variant and missing and not because they ...

This is a preview of the whole essay