The variationist view allows children to see when and where variant forms are appropriate, because their parents use them in the correct place, and so the children learn to switch between standard and dialectal forms in the same way as their primary care givers. The children are exhibiting “a clear link between the adult and the child features” where “the child can be seen attempting to approximate the adult model” (Kerswill,1996:188). This view is very different from the standard; children are using variant dialectal forms because they are aiming for the correct, standard, variant and missing and not because they are appropriate for the situation. This is supported by the fact that children use variant dialectal forms correctly in the correct social situations; if they were randomly aiming for a variant then surely they would not distinguish between all the variables available to them on the basis of social context. This is exemplified in a study by Youssef (1993) where data was collected from three children of pre school age in Trinidad. The data was analysed for stylistic variation between the Trinidad Creole, TC, and Standard English, SE, in the Verb Phrase which shows marked differences between TC and SE. It was shown that all three children shifted their speech style according to situation and addressee; more formal situations such as when the child was at school or during an interview required more use of the SE forms but informal situations such as when the child was at play or in a relaxed environment allow for the use of variants from TC (Youssef, 1993:257-274). This supports the idea that children learn to use variable forms at the same time as they learn to use the standard variant. Not only this they learn which is appropriate in which situation at the same time.
The variationist view of acquisition of variation also supports the view that “the dialect transmission period begins early – before the age of maximal peer group influence” (Roberts, 1997b:249). This means that a child growing up in a particular speech community will in turn speak like that community, following its rules and speaking with its dialect. It also shows that variation is primarily acquired in the early years of childhood and not so much in later childhood and adolescence; supporting the fact that it isn’t difficult for children to learn the variant forms. Kerswill’s (1996:90) study supports this showing that “children acquire most, if not all the phonological features of their local variety by the age of six”. This supports the view that young children do not find it difficult to learn variant forms. Could the same be said for older children and adolescents?
Once children age and become closer to the critical age for dialect acquisition it becomes more difficult for them to learn variant forms but some rules and oppositions can still be acquired. It is at this age that children begin to diverge from their primary caregivers’ speech style and begin to converge towards the speech style of their peers (Kerswill, 1996:92). This shows that children are using a different style, “they acquire the vernacular of the area between the ages of 5 and 12” (Chambers 1995:153), from their parents and are using the dialectal variables that they learned in earlier childhood. They develop new norms personal to them in their speech community distinct from the norms of their parents. In the main, this stage finds children moving from parent orientated to peer orientated networks and in the process they acquire morphologically conditioned rules (Kerswill, 1996:94).
Once children have passed the critical age of dialect acquisition, any age between the ages of seven and sixteen depending on the child, they are equivalent to an adult in terms of their ability to acquire language. At this age adolescents are desperately seeking peer acceptance and identity. They form social networks or groups at school which are quite distinct in many ways, including linguistically, from one another. The adolescents therefore change their style of speaking in accordance with accommodation theory. So adolescents will adapt their variants to be either in line with or distinct from those from another social group. This is important for acquisition of variation because as adolescents converge to be more like a social grouping they may acquire the variants that the group uses; in the same way they also pick up the intonation style of the group (Kerswill, 1996: 98-100). At this stage the adolescents, although trying to be distinct from adults, are acquiring knowledge of adult norms. Their desire for an individual social identity means that adolescents are willing to modify their speech but at the same time they no longer have the ability to acquire lexically complex rules, new oppositions or new intonational systems (Kerswill, 1996:100). Most of the changes that now take place are word changes, with vocabulary continuing to extend for many years after this time.
It can be seen that most of the variants are acquired in early childhood before the age of six. Children acquire these variants through the style shifting, between formal and vernacular, of their primary caregivers. From this they also learn which variant is appropriate in which social situation. At this early stage children acquire new variants with relative ease. After this stage children move into formal education and start to use more of the dialectal variants, they become distinct from their parents in their norm use. At this stage children are still able to acquire some variant forms, rules and oppositions but this is much more difficult than it was previously. Once children reach the age of adolescence they struggle to acquire new forms despite adapting their speech style to be like the social group they have aligned themselves with. After the age of sixteen, at the very latest, they are considered adults in terms of language acquisition. The only changes which take place from now on are word changes.
This paper has examined standard accepted view of acquisition of variation and the variationist view; it has looked at the contemporary studies in relation to acquisition of variable forms in early childhood and in adolescence. From the evidence examined it can be concluded that variable forms are easily acquired in early childhood, during the first stage of language acquisition. As the children age it becomes increasingly difficult form them to acquire the different forms and by the age of sixteen they no longer have the ability to acquire variant forms.
Bibliography
Chambers J.K. (1995) Dialect acquisition. Sociolinguistic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell
Kerswill, P. (1996) Children, Adolescents and Language Change. Language Variation and Change 8: 177-202
Pinker, S. Language Acquisition:
downloaded 01/03/06
Roberts, J (1997b) Hitting a moving target: Acquisition of sound changes by Philadelphian children. Language Variation and Change 9: 249-266
Romaine, S. (1986) The Language of Children and Adolescents: The Acquisition of Communicative Competence Oxford: Blackwell.
Snow, C.E. (1995) Issues in the study of input: finetuning, universality, individual and developmental difference, and necessary causes. In P. Fletcher & B. MacWhinney (eds.) The Handbook of Child Language. Oxford: Blackwell
Youssef, V (1993) Children’s linguistic choices: Audience design and societal norms. Language in Society 22: 257-274
0208545L “Variable forms are difficult to acquire”. Discuss Page of