• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the role of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socioemotional development? Analyse the positions of Piaget and Vygotsky, giving particular attention to Vygotskian concepts of the ZPD and internalisation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1: What is the role of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socioemotional development? Analyse the positions of Piaget and Vygotsky, giving particular attention to Vygotskian concepts of the ZPD and internalisation. Play can be defined as the combination of sensory exploration and motor skills (gross and fine), which inevitably lead to the cultivation of intellectual and socio-emotional abilities. Make-believe play fosters this cultivation in an imaginary environment, making use of pre-determined roles and rules and utilizes objects symbolically. Play through pretence is an important aspect in children's cognitive and socioemotional development. It allows children to create safe paradigms in which they have the control and ultimately determine the outcome. This is an important component of self-esteem, self-concept and self-regulation. Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky hold opposing theories in relation to the role of make-believe play in children's development. Piaget believed play parallels development, while Vygotsky theorized play promotes development. While there are facets of both Piaget and Vygotsky's work that complement the ideology surrounding make-believe play, it is Vygotsky's work that has greatly contributed to the advancement in understanding of the framework within this most important time of a child's development. According to Vygotsky, constructive play encourages cognitive and socioemotional development. (Bodrova et al, 1996) Vygotsky argued play promotes development in three distinctive characteristics. Firstly, play creates a ZPD and promotes internalisation. ...read more.

Middle

Piaget theorized that developmental milestones are a direct result of children's actions on their physical world. This involved the identification of challenging situations and the development of problem solving skills, so that they eventually meld with their external reality. Piaget's theory, works through a series of direct interactions between the child and its environment. This evolutionary process involves adaptation, assimilation and accommodation. Piaget notes that organization is the final stage in this developmental process. Piaget perceived play as a method which children use to develop their cognitive abilities and to practice their emergently cultivated capabilities. Piaget also perceived play as a child's adaptation to the world around them (their paradigm) through application of assimilation. Fitting in new ideas, objects and situations into their existing thought patterns or schema. Piaget asserted "...in play, assimilation predominates over accommodation and therefore, play does not significantly promote the child's cognitive development." (Vialle, Lysaght, & Verenikina, 2002, p.41) Piaget's theory includes the concept of compensation or child coping mechanisms through play, which Piaget did not acknowledge to be part of substantial development. In this regard children are simply redefining an unpleasant situation. Piaget claimed that there are three stages in the development of play; imitative or purposeful play, imaginary play, and play with rules. Each stage linking with a stage in Piaget's theory of child development, practice play connecting with the sensorimotor phase, symbolic play relating to the preoperational phase, and conventional play linking to the concrete operational phase. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, as the development increases the child's self view in the fantasy alters. It no longer needs to be egocentric, but now the child can view themselves as both recipient and agent. (Berk, 2000) According to Leong and Bodrova (2001), providing children with the opportunity of fantasy play and multi-purpose props can further develop children's imagination and creativity. Unlike Piaget, Vygotsky's ZPD is bi-directional which allows for internal reflection or metacognition. This view allows children to learn through self-correction. Self-correction may be without adult guidance. This is in direct opposition to Piaget whose theory of assimilation, which revolves around trying to make new situations fit pre-existing ideas, in make-believe play. While there is natural symbiosis between Piaget and Vygotsky's ideas, it is Vygotsky who offers a more flexible theory of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socio-emotional development. Vygotsky formulated and hypothesized that children are able to work beyond their individual level of development with scaffolding and adult or peer guidance. Both Vygotsky and Piaget believed through play children can discover the world, formulate opinions and impart some meaning to their ever-changing view of the world. Although Piaget' ideas regarding child development were revolutionary, it is Vygotsky who is more important in the field of child psychology. Vygotsky's creations of the ZPD and concept of internalisation have transformed modern ways of thinking. Rosemarie Pollum EDUF111 Essay 2 2003 Student no. 2607360 Tutorial time Tuesday 9.30am to 10.30am Pauline Lysaght ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Discuss, Compare and Contrast Piaget and Vygotsky’s Learning Theories.

    Acceptance of individual differences: Teachers must plan activities for individuals and small groups rather than for the total class. This is because Piaget assumes that all children do go through the same sequence of development, but at different rates.

  2. TO WHAT EXTENT DO THE GRAND THEORIES TAKE ACCOUNT OF THE ROLE OF SOCIAL ...

    Although it could be argued that for Vygotsky extrinsic and intrinsic forces are not really separate from or opposed to one another (Vygotsky, 1986). It is interesting to observe the different and contrasting emphasis that the four grand theories place on the role of social experiences in child development, both

  1. Compare and contrast any two theories of cognitive development. Analyse their application to ...

    It is at this stage that children that children demonstrate the use of logic when dealing with objects and events. Also, because children have begun to understand the concept of reversibility, which is the ability to mentally undo an action (Ford, 2004), they can complete tasks requiring logic such as

  2. This essay will look at the Cognitive explanation of gender and its theories and ...

    However as they develop with age, so does their understanding and therefore their schemas increase in complexity and they become more relaxed. An advantage of gender schema approach is that we can begin to trace stability and change in the child's gender-linked cognition and behaviour through tracking the child's development of schemas.

  1. Psychological and Sociological Perspectives On Human Development and Behaviour.

    The child usually develops numerical/mathematical ability. For example, at the age of five a child will be able to count stones if they are put in a straight line. By about eight years, the child will be able to count them in a circle.

  2. Universal Grammar In Second Language Acquisition: The nature of interlanguage representation.

    Applied Linguistics 16: 87-117. Klein, E., & Martohardjono, G. (In press). Investigating second language grammars: some conceptual and methodological issues in generative SLA research. In E. Klein & G. Martohardjono (Eds.), The development of second language grammars: a generative perspective ).

  1. Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview.

    first encountered en masse they constitute a bewildering obstacle to researchers who wish to study romantic attachment. In the remainder of this chapter we will report some of the results of a large-sample study that incorporated most of the extant self-report attachment measures, including some that are rarely referenced by attachment researchers.

  2. These days we are inundated with opinions on childrearing and childdevelopment.

    who like Plato, actually condemned the notion of 'natural equality'. He tried to test this by assessing individual performance on motor and sensory tasks (Evans & Waites, 1981). He assumed that someone's position on the social ladder corresponded with their level of 'natural ability'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work