• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is the role of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socioemotional development? Analyse the positions of Piaget and Vygotsky, giving particular attention to Vygotskian concepts of the ZPD and internalisation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1: What is the role of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socioemotional development? Analyse the positions of Piaget and Vygotsky, giving particular attention to Vygotskian concepts of the ZPD and internalisation. Play can be defined as the combination of sensory exploration and motor skills (gross and fine), which inevitably lead to the cultivation of intellectual and socio-emotional abilities. Make-believe play fosters this cultivation in an imaginary environment, making use of pre-determined roles and rules and utilizes objects symbolically. Play through pretence is an important aspect in children's cognitive and socioemotional development. It allows children to create safe paradigms in which they have the control and ultimately determine the outcome. This is an important component of self-esteem, self-concept and self-regulation. Jean Piaget and Lev Vygotsky hold opposing theories in relation to the role of make-believe play in children's development. Piaget believed play parallels development, while Vygotsky theorized play promotes development. While there are facets of both Piaget and Vygotsky's work that complement the ideology surrounding make-believe play, it is Vygotsky's work that has greatly contributed to the advancement in understanding of the framework within this most important time of a child's development. According to Vygotsky, constructive play encourages cognitive and socioemotional development. (Bodrova et al, 1996) Vygotsky argued play promotes development in three distinctive characteristics. Firstly, play creates a ZPD and promotes internalisation. ...read more.

Middle

Piaget theorized that developmental milestones are a direct result of children's actions on their physical world. This involved the identification of challenging situations and the development of problem solving skills, so that they eventually meld with their external reality. Piaget's theory, works through a series of direct interactions between the child and its environment. This evolutionary process involves adaptation, assimilation and accommodation. Piaget notes that organization is the final stage in this developmental process. Piaget perceived play as a method which children use to develop their cognitive abilities and to practice their emergently cultivated capabilities. Piaget also perceived play as a child's adaptation to the world around them (their paradigm) through application of assimilation. Fitting in new ideas, objects and situations into their existing thought patterns or schema. Piaget asserted "...in play, assimilation predominates over accommodation and therefore, play does not significantly promote the child's cognitive development." (Vialle, Lysaght, & Verenikina, 2002, p.41) Piaget's theory includes the concept of compensation or child coping mechanisms through play, which Piaget did not acknowledge to be part of substantial development. In this regard children are simply redefining an unpleasant situation. Piaget claimed that there are three stages in the development of play; imitative or purposeful play, imaginary play, and play with rules. Each stage linking with a stage in Piaget's theory of child development, practice play connecting with the sensorimotor phase, symbolic play relating to the preoperational phase, and conventional play linking to the concrete operational phase. ...read more.

Conclusion

In addition, as the development increases the child's self view in the fantasy alters. It no longer needs to be egocentric, but now the child can view themselves as both recipient and agent. (Berk, 2000) According to Leong and Bodrova (2001), providing children with the opportunity of fantasy play and multi-purpose props can further develop children's imagination and creativity. Unlike Piaget, Vygotsky's ZPD is bi-directional which allows for internal reflection or metacognition. This view allows children to learn through self-correction. Self-correction may be without adult guidance. This is in direct opposition to Piaget whose theory of assimilation, which revolves around trying to make new situations fit pre-existing ideas, in make-believe play. While there is natural symbiosis between Piaget and Vygotsky's ideas, it is Vygotsky who offers a more flexible theory of make-believe play in children's cognitive and socio-emotional development. Vygotsky formulated and hypothesized that children are able to work beyond their individual level of development with scaffolding and adult or peer guidance. Both Vygotsky and Piaget believed through play children can discover the world, formulate opinions and impart some meaning to their ever-changing view of the world. Although Piaget' ideas regarding child development were revolutionary, it is Vygotsky who is more important in the field of child psychology. Vygotsky's creations of the ZPD and concept of internalisation have transformed modern ways of thinking. Rosemarie Pollum EDUF111 Essay 2 2003 Student no. 2607360 Tutorial time Tuesday 9.30am to 10.30am Pauline Lysaght ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Developmental Psychology section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Developmental Psychology essays

  1. Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment: An Integrative Overview.

    more precisely than Bartholomew's measure among people with different degrees of insecurity. At least in relation to the nomological network we have been exploring in our research, this conservatism about calling a person secure generally leads to statistically stronger results, as illustrated in the next two sections.

  2. Psychosynthesis- a comparative essay

    PCA is not talking about techniques that are used in counselling, they are a set of values and attitudes that are held by the counsellor, "Sadly those who falsely conceptualise the core conditions as techniques to be deployed are perhaps the most culpable deceivers, for their shallowness leads to a prostitution of a life-enhancing gift."

  1. Discuss, Compare and Contrast Piaget and Vygotsky’s Learning Theories.

    Teaching at this stage covers broader concepts, not just facts, and students work in pairs on a topic, encouraging them to explain how they solve problems. By this stage the students should have the ability to analyse and discuss. * ASSIMILATION AND ACCOMODATION In Piaget's view, each unit of intelligent

  2. Psychological and Sociological Perspectives On Human Development and Behaviour.

    These are intermingled with games that go beyond reality, such as 'knights and dragons' and 'kings and queens'. However, both types of game require imagination and are rule governed. In situations of spontaneous imaginary, play rules may be formulated as the game progresses, but these rules are bound by existing societal rules.

  1. Select one aspect of child development (from cognitive, social, emotional or cultural).Compare and contrast ...

    The theorist believed when a child experienced a new event, disequilibrium set in until s/he was able to assimilate and accommodate the new information and thus attain equilibrium. This dual process, assimilation-accommodation, enables the child to form a schema in Piaget's opinion.

  2. To what extent do the grand theories take account of the role of social ...

    or idolising someone with the same flair in family / peers / idols all during their childhood period[5]. I feel this theory believes that children learning & development is influenced by the social interaction within which he grows. Banduraâs work shows that children are active learners and can extract general principles from what they observe without the sorts of reinforcement.

  1. Investigating the nature of children's scientific reasoning: cognitive structures, conflict and scaffolding.

    The investigation involved a semi-structured interview and a practical task, and features three parts. Each part included three stages. The details of the interview protocol, provided by The Open University (2013), have been included in Appendix 2. Part A assess the participant?s initial understanding with light objects that float and heavy objects that sink.

  2. To what extent do the grand theories take account of the role of social ...

    Watson (1924) extended this to human learning in an ethically questionable experiment creating a phobia in 11-month-old infant âLittle Albertâ. The second process is Skinnerâs operant conditioning. It explains how behaviours are learnt from their consequences and shape future occurrence of that behaviour.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work