A critical analysis of cross cultural celebrity endorsement: David Beckham

Authors Avatar

Critical analysis of cross cultural celebrity endorsements     200308251                                                                                                                                      

A critical analysis of cross cultural celebrity endorsement:

                                         David Beckham  

Executive summary

The use of celebrity endorsements is increasing rapidly throughout the advertising fraternity with four out of ten adverts now featuring a celebrity (Erdogan et al 2001).However, very little research has been conducted on the use of celebrities in cross cultural contexts. This paper will examine important considerations by comparing the use of celebrities in differing countries.  David Beckham among other celebrity endorsers, will be the primary focus of the analysis. In addition, a comparison will be made to seek connections, if any, on differing uses of celebrities internationally and further advance the debate on global or standardised advertising.

INTRODUCTION

What is a celebrity?

Most successful individuals from differing fields such as entertainment, sports, business and even politics have become celebrities in the eyes of the common man as they enjoy pinnacles of success that individuals in such societies aspire to.

Schickel argues that most societies today appear to be captivated by the glitz and glamour of celebrity life (Schickel 1985).   However, it is important to highlight that being a celebrity has become a profession in its own right.  Certainly, many celebrities have become such, only by constantly appearing on television and thus establishing their image in the minds of the consumer. For instance, Chantelle  has made over half a million pounds through endorsements simply from appearing on Big Brother. This indicates, to some extent, that becoming a celebrity is as much about talent as it is about media exposure ( ). The media has thus become saturated with information and images of such celebrities, resulting in celebrity glorification and glamorisation by the public.

 This new trend appears to have originated in the U.S.A with the onset of reality shows in the late 90s and spread to the U. K and most of Europe. There is, however, very little empirical evidence to suggest that the rest of the world is following this trend and this may largely be attributed to more conservative and traditional cultures of Asia, Latin America and Africa. As a result, this glamorisation has enabled celebrities to be easily recognised. For instance, Jamie Oliver school dinners offered a moral platform that elevated his celebrity status earning him an estimated £ 1.2 million. Sainsbury’s has taken advantage of this by using him to endorse consumer products. Such advertisements are estimated to have given Sainsbury an extra £ 1 billion worth of sales (   ) . Such success is largely due to the fact that celebrity endorsements  has the ability to penetrate extremely busy and cluttered advertising spots , draw consumer attention , generate high recall rates,  sales and profits (Agrawal and Kamakura 1995 Erdogan 1999; Gabor, Jeannye, and Wienner 1987; Kaikati 1987 ;).

Agenda setting

 

Celebrities reflect the norms and values attached to the culture in which they have attained their fame (Kahle and Homer 1985) .Naturally the selection of a celebrity and how they are used should mirror the basic cultural dimensions and values of that society. This can be done by adapting the celebrity to the cultural norms so that creative advertising strategy is matched to the fundamental cultural values of the target audiences. There must be some sense of identification between the celebrity endorser, the product and the culture in which advertising takes place.  Evidence reveals that culture is a significant aspect of advertising and is the most important yardstick through which differences in advertising can be measured. (Erdogan 1999) .Consequently adverts that are matched to cultural dimensions are more persuasive than those that are not.

There is a great deal of research on celebrity endorsements in relation to cross cultural analysis of advertising (Cho et al. 1999; Han and Shavitt 1994; Praet 2002).   However, these studies appear to have examined the frequency of celebrity appearance and little is known about the differences and similarities of cross cultural celebrity endorsement.  It is vital to determine whether celebrities as brands can be extended to endorse products at a global scale or should adapt to the cultural dimension of each country.  The purpose of this analysis is to establish a clearer understanding of cross-cultural similarities and differences in the practice of celebrity endorsement. This can be done by investigating the use and impact of David Beckham,  among others, as an endorser in several diametrically different countries or regions.  This brings into context cultural and global issues relating to the following issues.

(1).How celebrity endorsements work (2). low versus high context communication (3). individualism versus collectivism and (4). Standardisation vs. local responsiveness.  This study also closely examines the differing creative techniques in celebrity endorsements in different cultural contexts. This should reveal what is considered important or not. This study also consolidates current literature and gives direction on the significance of matching celebrities to the market and the extent that this can be achieved.

 General overview of celebrity endorsement

Using celebrities in advertising dates back to the late nineteenth century when the old Poland Company used a testimonial by a respected celebrity (Kaikati 1987). Since then the use of celebrities has become common advertising practice. For example,  20% of all U.K commercials now use celebrity endorsements  (Erdogan et al 2001)  and U.S brand week survey estimated that 20% of U.S ads used some form of endorsements while  10% of advertising spend was for celebrity endorsements. (Bradley 1996). Research carried out so far has focused on the realm of source credibility and attractiveness models by Ohanian (Pornpikitan 2003). These models  focus on how celebrities exert influence through perceived expertise ,  trustworthiness  , attractiveness , familiarity and  likeability .Some have even ventured into examining the celebrity and the product.( Choi, Lee and Kim, 2005 ) and maintain  that endorsements are more effective if there is a  “match up”  or fit between the image and characteristics  of the celebrity with the endorsed product.    

In a similar vein, McCracken suggests that a "celebrity who best represents the appropriate symbolic properties" of the product should be selected, thus highlighting the importance of the cultural meanings of celebrities in the endorsement process (McCracken 1989, p. 316).The author expands and suggests that celebrities represent a collection of culturally significant images, symbols, and values. As images of the celebrities become associated with products through endorsement, the meanings they attach to the products are transferred to consumers through purchase and consumption.

In this instance the author reveals that the attitude of the audience toward the celebrity endorser is transferred to the product and consequently influences purchase behaviour. Such an assertion, although largely true ,also appears to be contradicted by current examples including  the continued success of Beckham’s endorsements of Vodafone in the U.K . This is important because at that period there was growing public disproval of his alleged affair with Rebecca Loos. ( :2003-2004) If anything, sales of Vodafone tripled in the first 3 months that Beckham was used as an endorser. Such a phenomenon only supports the arguments that 1. Being a celebrity has as much to do with negative as well as positive fame. 2. That such fame does not automatically translate into negative product endorsements. However this example should not form the basis on preceding literature.

Join now!

In Iran photographs of  David Beckham where blacked out on billboards in the Iranian capital, Tehran, in what appears to be a backlash against western cultural influence despite Beckham's seemingly global appeal. Reuters quoted a source familiar with the advertising campaign as saying the commercials were deemed "too suggestive". Men are banned from wearing shorts in public in Iran, although football matches are screened on television. () .In this instance the backlash against the product (football) was not against the endorser, rather it was against what he represented: western cultural influence. It was acceptable to view Beckham playing football ...

This is a preview of the whole essay