American Home Products Capital Structure Case Study.

Extracts from this essay...

Introduction

From: Team Delta American Home Products Capital Structure Case Study Introduction American Home Products is a corporation involved in the production and marketing of over 1,500 consumer goods allocated among four distinct lines of business comprised of prescription drugs, packaged drugs, food products, housewares and household products. While the corporation does not invest heavily into the research and development of new lines of business, its success is a result of its ability to aggressively market the products it manufactures, especially the company's line of prescriptin drugs. American Home Products is a company with virtually no debt and an impressive amount of cash on its balance sheet. Under its current leadership, CEO William F. Laporte maintains an extremely conservative capital structure. During his 17 year tenure, Laporte's brand of centralized micro-management created a company with a clean, low-debt balance sheet; cash reserves equal to 40% of its net worth (Total Assets less Total Liabilities); sales in excess of $4 billion with growth ranging between 10%-15% annually; and remarkable gains in market share while reducing or maintaining a low level of expenses. All this combined with dividend growth of 222% between 1972 - 1981, contributed to the firm's AAA bond rating and to the popularity of AHP's stock among retail and, primarily, institutional investors.

Middle

These bonds were high-risk, and thus paid a high interest rate, because little or nothing backed them up. Companies during this period that were most susceptible to the LBO specter were those that were extremely cash-rich. After the takeover, the acquiring group could utilize the cash of the acquired company to either meet the interest payments of the high interest bonds or retire the bonds completely. Maintaining the 30% debt ratio allows the CEO to sustain tight control while avoiding the threat of a LBO. AHP could also leverage its strong balance sheet to borrow along other methods in order to execute a stock repurchase. While AHP certainly possesses the ability to meet additional debt obligations and interest payments, we would continue to argue against greater debt because with added securities outstanding, the possibility of an LBO increases during the high interest rate environment of the 1980s. Additionally, the company's financing needs outside of cash to repurchase outstanding stock is not great considering that AHP does not launch new products until a product has been proven successful in the market. We also would avoid a higher debt ratio from a personal perspective. Due to Mr. Laporte's conservative nature, we do not believe that he would welcome the recommendation of a drastic change to the company's capital structure - a move defined by an increase from 30% to 50 - 70% debt.

Conclusion

If AHP were to issue more debt in order to finance the repurchase of outstanding stock, it would maximize shareholder EPS (earnings/outstanding stock) because of the fewer shares outstanding. However, there would also be less profit after tax due to the higher interest payments required with each greater level of debt. In the end, the remaining outstanding shares may not be any better off because the firm would then have the responsibility of making greater interest payments. However, the potential value at 30% is presented with consistent lower interest payments, less variability in required sales, greater profit before tax, as well as more impressive financial ratios and firm net worth. Higher debt ratios at 50 or 70% include greater interest expenses with tax savings, but they also increase the firm's financial risk and to a degree, business risk too. We do not believe that it is a reasonable trade-off. If AHP were financing advances in R&D or product development to increase business operations, we would recommend a greater reliance on debt in order to increase the firm's access to sources of capital. However, this is not the case. What will the capital markets say? Given that our recommendation does not greatly deviate from the current capital structure, we do not anticipate a change in the company's debt rating or share price. Furthermore, management's style of leadership is not jeapordized with the recommended lower portion of debt because it follows the company's historical capital structure.

The above preview is unformatted text

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • Over 150,000 essays available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Over 180,000 student essays
  • Every subject and level covered
  • Thousands of essays marked by teachers

Related University Degree Finance

  1. Acquisition of Kraft_HBS Case Study answers

    > Interest Payments are forecasted in Exhibit 12 of Case Study. > Using the APV method we calculate a share price of $21.10 for Kraft's restructure plan. Philip Morris' Options In light of the present circumstances, Philip Morris has the following options: > Increasing their bid - is a very feasible course of action.

  2. A Case Study on O.M. Scott and Sons Company

    4.30 3.59 OK Quick Ratio 1.22 1.58 1.02 3.53 2.88 OK Activity Inventory Turnover 6.62 5.60 3.45 7.77 6.14 POOR Average Collection Period 50.89 72.10 68.18 147.67 179.42 POOR Average Payment Period 51.83 58.04 88.28

  1. Marvel case study

    Discount rate is equal to Return on Equity that was obtained from CAPM model: Re=Rf+beta(Rm-Rf)=6.89%+1.46(5.55%)=15% Free cash flows to equity were obtained from the projected data by Bear Sterns, calculations can be found beneath: 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 TCF Net (loss)

  2. Burroughs Welcome Company - Retrovir case analysis - Company Perspective

    Appendix Exhibit One: Wellcome Sales Growth and Net Income Growth Fiscal Year Sales Growth Net Income Growth 1985-1986 0.20% 7.20% 1986-1987 12.60% 47.30% 1987-1988 10.40% 35.10% 1988-1989 12.60% 42.90% Exhibit Two: Exhibit Three:

  1. Diageo Case Study

    Obviously, a BBB rating is not quite acceptable. As we can see, the trade off model and the credit rating issue have created a conflicting result. Evaluation and criticism on the trade off model "If the Trade-Off Theory were true, then firms ought to have much higher debt levels than we observe in reality."

  2. Atlantic Corporation_HBS Case

    The calculations we made are based on cash flows of Royal alone and do not include the synergy effect that will exist after the acquisition. Therefore, we conclude that it would be conservative to pay anything less than $377.8 million.

  1. My project title is COMPARATIVE STUDY OF HOME LOANS. I selected this topic because ...

    Finally, given a model of the factors affecting results for 2004-2005, we predict that 2006 results will continue to show an increase in the percentage of loans that are higher priced when final numbers are released in September 2007. Ramamurthy (1998), in his technical paper on the profitability and productivity

  2. This report provides for Nanda Home a basis analyses about finance: sources of finance, ...

    There are two kind of bond: convertible bond, and common bond. Convertible bond after time can convert to shares of company. II, Evaluation financial sources The question here is which financial resources can benefit Nanda Home most. Let weight pros and cons of those resources in detail.

  • Over 180,000 essays
    written by students
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to write
    your own great essays

Marked by a teacher

This essay has been marked by one of our great teachers. You can read the full teachers notes when you download the essay.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review on the essay page.

Peer reviewed

This essay has been reviewed by one of our specialist student essay reviewing squad. Read the full review under the essay preview on this page.