• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

American Home Products Capital Structure Case Study.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

From: Team Delta American Home Products Capital Structure Case Study Introduction American Home Products is a corporation involved in the production and marketing of over 1,500 consumer goods allocated among four distinct lines of business comprised of prescription drugs, packaged drugs, food products, housewares and household products. While the corporation does not invest heavily into the research and development of new lines of business, its success is a result of its ability to aggressively market the products it manufactures, especially the company's line of prescriptin drugs. American Home Products is a company with virtually no debt and an impressive amount of cash on its balance sheet. Under its current leadership, CEO William F. Laporte maintains an extremely conservative capital structure. During his 17 year tenure, Laporte's brand of centralized micro-management created a company with a clean, low-debt balance sheet; cash reserves equal to 40% of its net worth (Total Assets less Total Liabilities); sales in excess of $4 billion with growth ranging between 10%-15% annually; and remarkable gains in market share while reducing or maintaining a low level of expenses. All this combined with dividend growth of 222% between 1972 - 1981, contributed to the firm's AAA bond rating and to the popularity of AHP's stock among retail and, primarily, institutional investors. ...read more.

Middle

These bonds were high-risk, and thus paid a high interest rate, because little or nothing backed them up. Companies during this period that were most susceptible to the LBO specter were those that were extremely cash-rich. After the takeover, the acquiring group could utilize the cash of the acquired company to either meet the interest payments of the high interest bonds or retire the bonds completely. Maintaining the 30% debt ratio allows the CEO to sustain tight control while avoiding the threat of a LBO. AHP could also leverage its strong balance sheet to borrow along other methods in order to execute a stock repurchase. While AHP certainly possesses the ability to meet additional debt obligations and interest payments, we would continue to argue against greater debt because with added securities outstanding, the possibility of an LBO increases during the high interest rate environment of the 1980s. Additionally, the company's financing needs outside of cash to repurchase outstanding stock is not great considering that AHP does not launch new products until a product has been proven successful in the market. We also would avoid a higher debt ratio from a personal perspective. Due to Mr. Laporte's conservative nature, we do not believe that he would welcome the recommendation of a drastic change to the company's capital structure - a move defined by an increase from 30% to 50 - 70% debt. ...read more.

Conclusion

If AHP were to issue more debt in order to finance the repurchase of outstanding stock, it would maximize shareholder EPS (earnings/outstanding stock) because of the fewer shares outstanding. However, there would also be less profit after tax due to the higher interest payments required with each greater level of debt. In the end, the remaining outstanding shares may not be any better off because the firm would then have the responsibility of making greater interest payments. However, the potential value at 30% is presented with consistent lower interest payments, less variability in required sales, greater profit before tax, as well as more impressive financial ratios and firm net worth. Higher debt ratios at 50 or 70% include greater interest expenses with tax savings, but they also increase the firm's financial risk and to a degree, business risk too. We do not believe that it is a reasonable trade-off. If AHP were financing advances in R&D or product development to increase business operations, we would recommend a greater reliance on debt in order to increase the firm's access to sources of capital. However, this is not the case. What will the capital markets say? Given that our recommendation does not greatly deviate from the current capital structure, we do not anticipate a change in the company's debt rating or share price. Furthermore, management's style of leadership is not jeapordized with the recommended lower portion of debt because it follows the company's historical capital structure. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Finance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Finance essays

  1. Acquisition of Kraft_HBS Case Study answers

    It will also give greater pricing power as the merger will create the largest food company creating greater market share. Kraft itself has a great marketing team as it has done very well with known brands such as Miracle Whip and Seven Seas.

  2. A case study: Gordon Bethune and the turnaround of Continental Airlines.

    The kinds of incentives given to employees and the quality service that was offered to customers build a good relationship between the company and its clients and all these leads to the good performance of the company. Uncertainty avoidance This explains to what extend do people prefer structured versus unstructured situations.

  1. A Case Study on O.M. Scott and Sons Company

    4.30 3.59 OK Quick Ratio 1.22 1.58 1.02 3.53 2.88 OK Activity Inventory Turnover 6.62 5.60 3.45 7.77 6.14 POOR Average Collection Period 50.89 72.10 68.18 147.67 179.42 POOR Average Payment Period 51.83 58.04 88.28

  2. Atlantic Corporation_HBS Case

    $ 10 0 0 0 0 Current maturities, long-term debt 95 95 95 95 95 Long-term debt 1523 1757 1662 1567 1472 Other liabilities and deferred taxes 482 500 530 563 600 Common equity 2242 2,436.35 2,730.55 3,060.32 3,460.89 Total 4342 4788.4 5017.5 5285.3 5627.9

  1. Marvel case study

    of their bonds in the form of equity now and a breaking even again seems questionable. This argument does not necessarily hold for the investors who bought the deeply discounted bonds but given the valuation of Bear Stearns it is questionable whether they will recover their investment either.

  2. Skerries Nursing Home - Business plan.

    It is important to install routine. Yoga and dance classes delivered with professional instructors. Recreational activities are varied and include: painting, pottery, knitting, music, board games, card playing and games such as 'Charades'. We believe that it is vital to keep our residents mentally and physically stimulated at all times and it is important for us to keep them interested in their surroundings.

  1. Diageo Case Study

    Meanwhile, the cost of raising debt increases significantly as too much debt obligation would lead the company to financial distress or even bankruptcy. Either of the situations would cause severe damage to company value. In this sense, debt is a "double-blade sword" in capital financing.

  2. Sealed Air Co. Case Study queestions. Why did Sealed Air undertake a leveraged ...

    = 413.74 - 35.5*35% = 401.32 We ignore the f(D)1 because the amount of debt before recapitalization is so small that the probability of bankruptcy and the cost of bankruptcy are small as well. EBIT Interest coverage ratio = 53.7/17.1 = 3.14 (Rate BB)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work