• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18

Australia has introduced Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS)

Extracts from this document...


Globalisation has led more countries to open their doors to foreign investment. As business expands across borders, both the public and private sectors are increasingly recognising the need for globally accepted accounting and auditing standards. Most major capital markets are pursuing convergence towards a single set of globally accepted standards recognising that global capital markets require high quality, globally consistent and uniform regulatory and standards regimes. So Australia has introduced Australian equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards (AIFRS) for reporting periods commencing on or after 1 January 2005. The transition from the previous Australia Generally Accepted Accounting principles (AGAAP) to AIFRS is a major change for companies. Based on the research from academic and professional journals, 'the benefits of adopting IFRS are obvious' (Carroll, 2003a), it becomes a more effective communication and engagement between business, investor and other shareholders. The benefits of adoption are likely to outweigh of the negative impacts. A1. Benefits to Australian Business a) Quality and Comparability of Financial Statements and More Efficient Capital Markets The benefit of adoption of IFRS is 'improvement in the efficiency of the capital markets that will arise from the existence of a set of globally acceptable accounting standards that result in high-quality, comparable and transparent financial reporting' (Alfredson, 2003a; Alfredson, 2003b). At this point, both domestic and foreign investors will be better able to comprehend the information contained in Australian financial reports and make valid comparisons with alternative investment opportunities. Also, a large number of private and public sector entities of all kinds are obliged to prepare their financial reports under the provisions of AIFRS. These entities not only have to consider the technical issues involved in the transition to the new accounting standards, but also the potential effect on investor sentiment of the move to AIFRS. The major benefit of adopting of IFRS as 'financial statement comparability for investors, can reducing the cost of capital in Australia and improving access to foreign capital for Australian entities' (Knapp, 2003). ...read more.


1. Business combinations: AASB3 'Business combinations' contingent liabilities that are reliably measurable are required to be recognised as part of the business combination and intangible assets are required to be recognised separately from goodwill. According to Note 38 (a) intangible assets relating to brand names and goodwill were recognised in respect of the acquisitions, such as acquisition of Clive Anthonys Pty Ltd. There were no other intangible assets or contingent liabilities requiring recognition under AIFRS. 2. Intangibles: According to Note 38 (c) On acquisition business assets of JB HI-FI, brand names of $43,094 thousand were recognized under A-GAAP but when transition to A-IFRS the value of the brand was increased by $12,928 thousand, as a result of recognising the deferred tax liability arising from the recognition of this asset. 'The directors have reviewed the carrying value of both brand name and goodwill on consolidation and are satisfied the value of these intangibles has not been impaired during the 2005 financial year and since the acquisition date.' 3. Leases: AASB117 'Leases' and according to Note 38 (h) the consolidated entity is required to account for fixed rate increase in operating leases on a straight line basis and other current and non-current provisions at 30 June 2005 will increase by $1,016 thousand of JB HI-FI. 4. Impairment of assets: AASB136 'Impairment of assets' require the recoverable amount of assets to be assessed on a Cash Generating Unit, whereby assets are recognised in respect of the independent cash flows they generate. In addition, future cash flows are required to be discounted under A-IFRS. According to Note 38 (j) impairment losses of $412 thousand of JBH will need to be recognized in respect of leasehold improvements for the financial year ended 30 June 2005. 5. Employee Benefits: AASB119 'Employee Benefits' the consolidated entity is required to account for its annual leave provision on a current and non-current basis. ...read more.


While such quantified disclosures were not required in 30 June 2004 accounts, they will have to be made in those for periods ending on or after 30 June 2005. It appears significant preparation and consideration of the impact of adoption of IFRS remains to be undertaken by Australian businesss. Carroll, N., 2003a, 'Thought Required Before the IFRS Plunge', Australian CPA, November, p. 76. Alfredson, K., 2003a, '2005 Implementation - A Status Report', CA Charter, April, pp. 50-52. Alfredson, K., 2003b, 'One Way Street', Australian CPA, February, p. 66. Knapp, J., 2003, 'International Convergence 2005: Off and Running', CA Charter, September, pp. 54-58. Collett, P.H., Godfrey, J.M. and Hrasky, S.L., 2001, 'International Harmonization: Cautions from the Australian Experience', Accounting Horizons, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 171-182. Haswell, S. and McKinnon, J., 2003, 'IASB Standards for Australia by 2005: Catapult or Trojan Horse?', Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 8-16. Williamson, K., 2003, 'Time for a Smooth Change', Australian CPA, June, pp. 74-77. Dodd, C. and Sheehan, V., 2004, 'On Your Mark, Get Set ...', Charter, February, pp. 66-67. Nobes, C. and Parker, R., 2004, Comparative International Accounting, 8th edition, Pearson Education, Harlow, England. Heathcote, A., 2005, 'Australia's most wanted', Business Review Weekly, January 13-19, pp. 68-69. Perera, H.B., Rahman, A.R. and Cahan, S.F., 2003, 'Globalisation and the Major Accounting Firms', Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 27-37. Howieson, B. and Langfield-Smith, I., 2003, 'The FRC and Accounting Standard Setting: Should I Still Call Australia Home?', Australian Accounting Review, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 17-26. Peter, G..Gerhardy., 2005, 'A Review of the Costs and Benefits of Australian Adoption of IFRS' School Of Commerce Research Paper, Series 05-4, ISSN1441-3906. Flight Centre Limited, Annual Report 2005, 2005 JB HI-FI Limited, Annual Report 2005, 2005 Australian Infrastructure Fund, Annual Report 2005, 2005 Riversdale Mining Limited, Annual Report 2005, 2005 Henderson S. & Peirson G., (2004), 11th Edition, Issues in Financial Accounting, Prentice Hall, Melbourne, p.32. Buffini, F., 2004e, 'Asic pleased with efforts on accounting rules', The Australian Financial Review, 23 November, p. 3. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Accounting section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Accounting essays

  1. The Importance of Communication in Accounting. Todays accountant, especially within the managerial accounting realm, ...

    Some participants considered evaluating and communicating the values and intentions of upper management to be of utmost importance. One participant also pointed out that, while this is currently not an audit standard, analysts often determine the "tone at the top" and consider it of high importance when evaluating the quality of an investment in a given company.

  2. Microsoft financial reporting strategy

    that the company begins amortizing software costs at the beginning of the following year. Estimate the effect of capitalizing software costs on Microsoft's fiscal 1997, 1998, and 1999 income statements and balance sheets. 95 96 97 98 99 Total R&D costs 860 1326 1863 2601 2970 Capitalize 60% of 516

  1. Contemporary issues in management accounting - Target costing,Life cycle costing andQuality ...

    The process cost is the total of the cost of conformance (COC) and the cost of non-conformance (CONC) for a particular process. The COC is the actual process cost of providing products or services to the required standards, first time and every time, by a given specified process.

  2. "Microsoft's Financial Reporting Strategy"

    0.46 0.77 Diluted EPS 0.33 0.42 0.71 All these might have invited more investors and also help the market value of the stock in 1999 to rocket to more than three times of its initial value in1985. 2 Effects of Software Capitalization By writing down research and development costs as

  1. Accounting has being blamed for the losses suffered by investors as a result of ...

    The problem was some of the contracts Enron had entered into were dubious and the costs associated questionable. This was key to Enron's revenue recognition and was used to make predictions of energy prices and interest rates far into the future that boosted their accounts (see, for example, Healy and Palepu, 2003, pp.9-10; Thomas, 2002, p.43).

  2. Carlton Computers Accounting Standards

    seller would still exist if the item were damaged or stolen In the above stated transaction, $20,000 has been paid by the buyer, but this is only 5% of the total transaction, and it doesn't give any assurance that the system will be purchased in the end.

  1. Critical review on Accounting for varieties of capitalism: The case against a single set ...

    In line with Ball (1989), in order to gain comparative advantage, firms need to keep commercial secrecy for information on internal affairs, especially internal contracting technologies, from competitors and other third parties. By contrast, the stock market requires the external investors to be well informed by firms for valuing the firms based on the nature of capitalism.

  2. This report will incorporate an analysis of Blackmores LTD including, the level of leverage ...

    Change in Sales Growth Rate(2011-2020) Growth Rate (2011-2020) % change in sales growth rate Share price % change in share price 5.37% -50% 26.34 -30.78% 7.51% -30% 30.6 -19.58% 9.66% -10% 35.43 -6.89% 10.73% 0% 38.05 0.00% 11.80% 10% 40.83 7.31% 13.95% 30% 46.9 23.26% 16.10% 50% 53.67 41.05% Figure 10 below shows the positive

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work