• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35
  36. 36
    36
  37. 37
    37
  38. 38
    38
  39. 39
    39
  40. 40
    40
  41. 41
    41
  42. 42
    42
  43. 43
    43
  44. 44
    44

China, India and the World Economy

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

China, India and the World Economy T.N. Srinivasan* Introduction Among countries with at least 10 million people in 2003, China and India have been growing very rapidly since 1980. The World Bank (2005, Table 4.1) reports that China's GDP grew the fastest at an average rate of 10.3% per year during 1980-90, while India's grew at 5.7%. Of the five countries that grew faster than India during this decade, none did so subsequently during 1990-2003. In the latter period, China's GDP again grew fastest at the rate of 9.6% on an average per year, while India and Malaysia, at 5.9% per year, were the third most rapidly growing countries, with Mozambique at 7.1% being the second. In 2003-04, India's GDP growth rate jumped to 8.5%, fueled by recovery from a severe drought in the pervious year. The estimated growth rate for 2004-05 is 7.5% and the projected rate for 2005-06 is 8.1% (CSO, 2006; RBI, 2006). China's GDP growth rates, based on revised data, were 10.1% and 9.9% respectively in 2004 and 2005 and the projected rate for 2006 is 9.2% (World Bank, 2006, Table 1). Thus both countries continue to grow rapidly. In terms of absolute level of Gross National Income (GNI) at Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) exchange rates in 2003, China, with $6.4 trillion in GNI, was second largest in the World, second only to the United States at $11 trillion. India with $3 trillion in GNI was fourth after the U.S., China and Japan (3.6 trillion) (World Bank, 2005, Table 8.1). It is likely that in 2005, India replaced Japan as the country with the third largest GNI. IMF (2005, Box 1.4) estimates India's share in global output at PPP exchange rates to have risen from 4.3% in 1990 to 5.8% in 2004, and India's growth during 2003 and 2004 to have accounted for one-fifth of Asian growth and one-tenth of World growth, as compared to China's contribution respectively of 53% and 28%. ...read more.

Middle

From about 50,000 cars in the early 1980s, India produced over 1,200,000 in 2004, and exported 160,000 cars, many to the developed world. (Rajan, 2006, p4). Sutton (2005) examined the extent to which Chinese and Indian auto component producers have advanced towards international best practice levels of productivity and quality through a survey of nine car manufacturers in China and six in India and a range of general component suppliers in both countries with detailed bench-marking of six seat producers and six exhaust suppliers in each country. The main finding of the study is that "the development of the auto industry supply chain in both China and India has proceeded very rapidly at the level of car makers and their first-tier suppliers: here current standards of supplier quality are at, or close to, world standards. The main weakness of the supply chain lies in the fact that best practice techniques are permeating down to second tier suppliers in a very slow and uneven manner. The similarity in the pattern across both countries is striking" (Sutton, 2005, Executive Summary). It found also that "While the development of the local supply chain in both countries has in large part been driven by the presence of multinational car makers, component exports are driven equally by multinational and domestic firms. Both India and China have a substantial body of purely domestic firms that have achieved major successes in export markets; of the top ten component exporters in China, six are domestic firms; of India's top 10, half are domestic firms (and three of these belong to a single domestic industrial group" (ibid). It would seem that the prospects for both China and India to play a major role in the evolution of global auto and parts market are bright. This will intensify the competitive pressure on established auto (particularly auto parts) firms in industrial countries. This is already evident from the bankruptcy of the component makers Delphi in the US. ...read more.

Conclusion

In concluding the paper let me refer to the provocative questions raised by Huang and Khanna (2003) and Huang (Financial Times January 23, 2006). The first article articulated the view that although India was not outperforming China overall it is doing better in key areas and that success may enable it to catch up with and perhaps overtake China. The key areas in which India performed better included (1) the spawning of internationally competitive homegrown small companies. Out of Forbes 200 of the World's best small companies in 2002, there were 13 Indian firms as compared to China's four (2). India's stronger infrastructure in terms of far more efficient and transparent capital markets to support private enterprise so that entrepreneurship and free enterprise are flourishing. In a survey of leading Asian companies through polling of 2500 executives and professionals in a dozen countries by the Far Eastern Economic Review, only two Chinese firms had high enough scores to qualify for being rated among India's top 10. In the second article, Huang points to the booming stock market in India in contrast to market collapse in Shanghai, and the better functioning of India's financial system despite its many faults in not discriminating as much against innovative small enterprises as compared to China's system. Wolf(2006) also notes some of India's institutional advantages over China noted earlier: a well-developed private sector; a relatively entrenched legal system; a stable democracy and freedom of speech; a modestly better score on corruption and rule of law in World Bank's governance indicators. He concludes that India's prospects for overtaking China depend on implementing difficult reforms in five pivotal areas: deregulation of labour markets and an end to the small-scale sector; revitalization of agricultural growth; increased investment in infrastructure; elimination of fiscal deficits; and, finally, across-the-board privatization and further trade liberalization Whether or not India overtakes China in the next two decades, it is clear that both countries will be economic powerhouses in the medium term. Undoubtedly, their growth will have significant impacts on the World economy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Describe the shifts in the world economy over the past 30 years. What are ...

    Natural disasters are not the only factors that affect the world economy. Human intervention, conflicts between nations and terrorist attacks can play a major role in the disruption of the world's economy. A good example is September 11 terrorist attacks in the United States.

  2. Innovation For Business Success. It is possible to be innovative in both large ...

    real time news, for one-fifth of the unit cost of one hour of network news. It chose not to follow the traditional format of news delivery, and broke away from what its competitors had been doing; not letting competitors set the parameters of their strategic thinking.

  1. The global business environment and its impact on Nestle.

    Figure 8 * Government > The Government can be defined as the governing body of a state. Or else the system by which a state or community is governed. > As the globalization developments we can see Most of the public organization been transferred in to the private sector.(Privatization)

  2. Leadership Theories - this review seeks to determine which theoretical perspectives, theories and schools ...

    This is where leadership development with a strategic lens comes into play. Thus, improvement of the organization's strategy is the end goal of development, but in practice the focus of development will vary depending on the theoretical perspective from which this perspective is attainting its beliefs.

  1. Sustainability Report. Aims: To analyse and study the key strategies towards environment and sustainability ...

    Metering will also give substantial information to assist in the management process. Supply of Water New infrastructures for water supply can greatly reduce the loss of water into the ground from the old pipes. Rain water harvesting from buildings around the site and reusing grey water on a life cycle

  2. Leadership Persuasive Speech

    When Creon returned with news about the town, Oedipus said, "Speak before all. Their plight concerns me now, more than my life" (p.28). This shows that he was honest and deeply cared for the well being of his people. Although his openness was a superb quality it also led to his downfall.

  1. What are the primary competitive forces impacting U.S. steel producers in general and the ...

    Concerning the strategic options concerning timing of entry, Nucor is a leader - offensive. The commercializing of new technologies and new plant construction was a big part of the growth strategy and helped keep Nucor a leader in technology. Nucor has achieved a sustainable competitive advantage over many of its

  2. Discuss the relationship between entrepreneurship, innovation and economic development. What role do creativity and ...

    In basics terms, it is âa creative concept technique that uses criteria in an advantage-disadvantage matrixâ; effectively meaning the model is chosen based on the greatest score attained (Lumsdaine and Binks, 2007, Page 71). So in this instance it may have weighed up that the potential increased revenue by not

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work