• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast NPV with IRR as a method of investment appraisal

Extracts from this document...


Compare and contrast NPV with IRR as a method of investment appraisal Investment decisions are vitally important to a business because it involves making an outlay of something of economic value, usually cash, which the outlay precedes to benefits. If a wrong decision is made, the effects on the business could be significant and it might also mean closing down the activity and sell the premises at a significant loss. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) and Net Present Value (NPV) are both methods used in practice by businesses to evaluate investment opportunities (long-term assets, i.e. machineries). The method of NPV uses the discounting cash flow which recognizes money coming in the firm in the future will be worth less value than the money equivalent they have today. ...read more.


In NPV, we use the discount rate on the basis for the minimum return we will accept. If the NPV is positive, we accept the project, and if the NPV is negative, we reject the project. IRR is quite closely related to the NPV method since it also involves discounting future cash flows. When applied to its future cash flows, it will produce precisely zero NPV. It uses the iteration approach (trial and error) to be adopted. For any project to be acceptable, it must meet the minimum IRR, which tends to be the opportunity cost of finance. And where there are two or more projects involved, the one with the highest IRR should be chosen. IRR is in many ways similar to NPV. However, it does have some problems. It ignores the real world, which therefore could lead to wrong decisions being made. ...read more.


In order to find out, we must do the NPV calculation. IRR is an average, in contrast to NPV, which can use a different discount rate for each year of the cash flow. NPV takes account of the time value of money. I have come to the conclusion that the NPV method is a better method of appraising investment opportunities than the IRR method. Reason being, although IRR has similar attributes to NPV, it has yet too many problems that could lead to a wrong decision being made, such as ignoring the real world and having multiple IRR's in a situation. Also, when coming to choose between two projects, the NPV method would be better and more reliable discriminator than to use IRR. So in my opinion, I think that the NPV is the best method and therefore it should be the only method used in the investment appraisal. Assignment by: Chi-Man Lam Student ID No.: 02040652 Course Pathway: CATF2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Political & International Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Political & International Economics essays

  1. Discuss the differences, advantages and disadvantages between payback, IRR, ARR, and NPV.

    I shall now go onto to compare and contrast two other forms of investment analysis. These being NPV (Net present value) and IRR (Internal rate of return) NPV As the flaws in the payback and ARR methods were recognised, people began to search for ways in which to improve the effectiveness of investment analysing.

  2. Explain the theoretical rationale for the NPV approach to investment appraisal and compare the ...

    future cash flows at the return investors require and subtract the initial outlay. NPV = -10 + 2 + 5 + 5 = � 2.224m (1.2) (1.2)2 (1.2)3 As I have mentioned the NPV rule in the introduction, if NPV is positive then accept the investment if it is negative then reject.

  1. Foreign Direct Investment: country comparison

    Venezuela's enormous potential was somewhat realised under the reform-based leadership of President Carlos Andres Perez, when Venezuela enjoyed the highest annual income per capita in Latin America (Mann, 1992). When Perez stepped into power in 1989, the country was suffering the debilitating effects of political patronage, corruption, and poor economic management.

  2. What does Dicken (1986) mean when he argues that internationalisation is best viewed as ...

    From the start, changing patterns within this structure are obvious; Spain and to a lesser extent Portugal, originally core countries, declined to semi-peripheral status and the U.S., initially a peripheral nation, improved itself to core status and the leading world industrial power of the twentieth century, taking Britain's place.

  1. Compare and contrast the two theories of the business cycle.

    After a deep recession in the 1990-92, the UK left the exchange Rate Mechanism in 1992; it also reduced interest rates, and allowed the pound to depreciate substantially. Many articles and textbooks ask the question is there a business cycle?

  2. This paper gives an overview of an investment advice that involves analyzing the basic ...

    Within the realm of financial assets, investors can achieve any position on an expected return-risk trade-off. Investors unwilling to assume risk must be satisfied with the risk-free rate of return but if they wish to try to earn a higher rate of return, they must be willing to assume a higher risk.

  1. Conservative Consulting ltd - Proposal and investment Plan, conservative consulting's investment proposal for Mr ...

    * Mr. Roberts is a member of the University's Superannuating Scheme (USS) and has been making payments in to the scheme for over thirty years. His annual contribution into this scheme is 6.35% of his annual salary, which consequently has amounted to an annual pension of �25,000 and a lump sum of �75,000 on retirement.

  2. This report is to determine how much sporting events can contribute to inward investment. ...

    and one NIC (South Korea). The summer Olympics held in Sydney, Australia in 2000, focused strongly on investment, especially from businesses. The focus on industrial development, investment attraction and tourism was greater than for any other Olympic Games. The second case study is the Manchester Commonwealth Games, the largest sporting event held in the UK since the 1948 Olympics.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work