• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Four Theories of Leadership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Clawson (2006) states "Leadership has been widely studied over a long period of time, yet it remains an elusive phenomenon to understand and develop (appendix). A number of leadership theories have been developed with the goal of providing guidance and instruction to current and aspiring leaders. Clawson (2006) outlines six categories of leadership theories; "trait, behavior, power and influence, situational, charismatic, and transformational" (appendix). In addition to these six categories, moral leadership is a theory that is presented as leadership through a well defined set of morals. Leadership has definitions left open to interpretation however, according to Wren (1995), his definition of leadership is "a leader inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations-the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations-of both leaders and followers" (p.100). This essay will initially provide a basic definition of each leadership model; provide a comparison and dissimilarity of the transformational, charismatic, situational and moral leadership theories while outlining how each theory may address today's leadership issues and challenges. Transformational Leadership Transformational leadership is seen as a process in which leaders and followers inspire one another to elevated moral conduct (Clawson, 1996). Transformational leadership can be used to influence superiors and subordinates and when under the influence of this leadership, feel as though they are bettering themselves (Clawson, 1996). According to Avolio and Yammarino (2002), Transformational leadership has been shown to correlate positively with performance outcome measures ranging from growth in church membership (Onnen, 1987) ...read more.

Middle

The charismatic leadership theory can be very useful for short-term projects for with this type of leadership, the group's success depends on the leader. Situational Leadership This type of leadership is based on the assumption that each situation is different and each requires a unique combination of followers, leaders, and leadership situations. Wren (1995) states "Situational leadership is an attempt to demonstrate the appropriate relationship between the leader's behavior and a particular aspect of the situation-the readiness level exhibited by the followers" (p.207). The leadership style varies from one individual to another depending on the follower's readiness level, competences, task areas, and their commitment to them. The situational leader's roles can be likened to a manager and parent at the same time. His leadership style changes when he is trying to influence and supervise someone. He can use any of the following leadership styles: directing, coaching, supporting, delegating depending on the situation that he is in. He can also use autocratic, participative or other leadership styles and techniques in order to succeed in the task. Moral Leadership Moral leadership is not just about preaching what is right or wrong or the insistence that one adhere to social conformity. Moral leadership emerges from a set of values. The idea behind moral leadership is to produce social change that will satisfy a follower's authentic needs. (Wren, 1995, p.483) A moral leader is cognizant of the impact of his leadership on those who follow. ...read more.

Conclusion

Leadership Issues and Challenges Tichy & Devanna (1990) state "At an organizational level, we need to prepare our institutions to engage in the struggle for transformation. We must accept the challenge regardless of where we sit in the organization" (p.9). The primary challenge for an organization is to have the correct leader in place to achieve the organizational vision. This challenge is overcome by fully understanding the types of leadership, the qualities associated with each leadership type, and having the ability to see the leadership traits in the employees. Nahavandi (2006) states "Our past and our current knowledge base will guide us toward continued understanding of who leaders are, what makes them effective, and how we can all learn to lead better". History is cluttered with numerous scandals and corporate wrong doing due to ineffective leadership. When you have a charismatic leader leading an organization looking to transform into a global leader, the results may not be in line with what the organization envisioned. When looking at all the various leadership theories available, as an organization, it is imperative to fully understand the type of leader the organization needs. Perhaps the ultimate catch-all leader is a situational leader. Perhaps the ideal leader is full of charisma and brings life to a dead organization. Or further still, perhaps the organization is geared towards social upgrade and a moral leader is needed. No matter what type of leadership is needed, there is a theory designed to get the organization to achieve its goals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Comparing Leadership styles of Western and Asian Managers.

    say that we now have ? complete and shared understanding ?f leadership. This is powerfully exemplified by th? fact that after literally thousands ?f studies in th? field we have yet t? develop "? general theory ?f leadership that explains all aspects ?f th? process adequately" (Yukl, 1994, p.

  2. Leadership Theories - this review seeks to determine which theoretical perspectives, theories and schools ...

    THE HETEROGENEOUSNESS OF LEADERSHIP: MYRIAD OF THEORIES, DEFINTIONS AND CONCEPTS "(...) theory is supposed to be a way of trying to understand fact. Sometimes, leadership theory becomes a way of obscuring fact." - Bass, 1990:26 Nothing exemplifies the multiplicity and fragmentation of the leadership literature as an exhibition of its multitude of theories.

  1. General Management - organisation, leadership and theories.

    Robert Fomon, longtime autocratic chief executive of E. F. Hutton, refused to set up control systems because he wanted to personally supervise senior management. At one time he reviewed the salaries and bonuses of more than 1,000 employees, but eventually Hutton grew too big for his personal supervision.

  2. Analysis of my leadership. Awareness and Assessment: My Leader Self-Insights. Integrated summary of ...

    lead our lives as a leader, because it will take more time to fix the problems and people will get frustrated and not support for what I will do as a leader and try to look for another leader, another is I usually don`t get what I want most of

  1. Managing Change in Organization

    * Technological reforms have also been made under change process at McDonald's in UK. However, certain important activities are still to be entered by managers manually in the computer systems. Due to certain complexity, some times managers make errors during manual handling of the systems.

  2. "Focus on leadership style"

    In practice, as they say, things are not that simple. Factors that affect situational decisions include motivation and capability of followers. This, in turn, is affected by factors within the particular situation. The relationship between followers and the leader may be another factor that affects leader behavior as much as it does follower behavior.

  1. "Does the 21st century transformational form of superleader simply represent the re-emergence of trait-based ...

    They may also follow them because they show leadership. The latter is generally something more informal. It is the ability to act in unusual and extraordinary situations. In this way, leaders do not simply influence but they have to show that crises or unexpected events and experiences do not have an impact on them.

  2. Critically evaluate historical, classical and contemporary approaches to leadership theory.

    Creating ownership 1. Ownership can be best created with the involvement of people to identify problems and to craft solutions. It can be tangible or psychological and is is reinforced by incentives and rewards. Communicating the message 1. Change programs can be best where core messages are reinforced through regular and timely advice which is both practical and inspirational.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work