• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and Contrast the Four Theories of Leadership

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Clawson (2006) states "Leadership has been widely studied over a long period of time, yet it remains an elusive phenomenon to understand and develop (appendix). A number of leadership theories have been developed with the goal of providing guidance and instruction to current and aspiring leaders. Clawson (2006) outlines six categories of leadership theories; "trait, behavior, power and influence, situational, charismatic, and transformational" (appendix). In addition to these six categories, moral leadership is a theory that is presented as leadership through a well defined set of morals. Leadership has definitions left open to interpretation however, according to Wren (1995), his definition of leadership is "a leader inducing followers to act for certain goals that represent the values and the motivations-the wants and needs, the aspirations and expectations-of both leaders and followers" (p.100). This essay will initially provide a basic definition of each leadership model; provide a comparison and dissimilarity of the transformational, charismatic, situational and moral leadership theories while outlining how each theory may address today's leadership issues and challenges. Transformational Leadership Transformational leadership is seen as a process in which leaders and followers inspire one another to elevated moral conduct (Clawson, 1996). Transformational leadership can be used to influence superiors and subordinates and when under the influence of this leadership, feel as though they are bettering themselves (Clawson, 1996). According to Avolio and Yammarino (2002), Transformational leadership has been shown to correlate positively with performance outcome measures ranging from growth in church membership (Onnen, 1987) ...read more.

Middle

The charismatic leadership theory can be very useful for short-term projects for with this type of leadership, the group's success depends on the leader. Situational Leadership This type of leadership is based on the assumption that each situation is different and each requires a unique combination of followers, leaders, and leadership situations. Wren (1995) states "Situational leadership is an attempt to demonstrate the appropriate relationship between the leader's behavior and a particular aspect of the situation-the readiness level exhibited by the followers" (p.207). The leadership style varies from one individual to another depending on the follower's readiness level, competences, task areas, and their commitment to them. The situational leader's roles can be likened to a manager and parent at the same time. His leadership style changes when he is trying to influence and supervise someone. He can use any of the following leadership styles: directing, coaching, supporting, delegating depending on the situation that he is in. He can also use autocratic, participative or other leadership styles and techniques in order to succeed in the task. Moral Leadership Moral leadership is not just about preaching what is right or wrong or the insistence that one adhere to social conformity. Moral leadership emerges from a set of values. The idea behind moral leadership is to produce social change that will satisfy a follower's authentic needs. (Wren, 1995, p.483) A moral leader is cognizant of the impact of his leadership on those who follow. ...read more.

Conclusion

Leadership Issues and Challenges Tichy & Devanna (1990) state "At an organizational level, we need to prepare our institutions to engage in the struggle for transformation. We must accept the challenge regardless of where we sit in the organization" (p.9). The primary challenge for an organization is to have the correct leader in place to achieve the organizational vision. This challenge is overcome by fully understanding the types of leadership, the qualities associated with each leadership type, and having the ability to see the leadership traits in the employees. Nahavandi (2006) states "Our past and our current knowledge base will guide us toward continued understanding of who leaders are, what makes them effective, and how we can all learn to lead better". History is cluttered with numerous scandals and corporate wrong doing due to ineffective leadership. When you have a charismatic leader leading an organization looking to transform into a global leader, the results may not be in line with what the organization envisioned. When looking at all the various leadership theories available, as an organization, it is imperative to fully understand the type of leader the organization needs. Perhaps the ultimate catch-all leader is a situational leader. Perhaps the ideal leader is full of charisma and brings life to a dead organization. Or further still, perhaps the organization is geared towards social upgrade and a moral leader is needed. No matter what type of leadership is needed, there is a theory designed to get the organization to achieve its goals. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. Leadership Theories - this review seeks to determine which theoretical perspectives, theories and schools ...

    Barge, Fairhurst, 2008; Shamir, Dayan-Horesh & Adler, 2005). More importantly, even Hunt's (1991) ontological and epistemological portrayal of leadership knowledge contains an implicit ontology that he might not have realized at the time. Drath and colleagues (2008) have argued recently that there is an underlying ontological commitment beneath the majority

  2. General Management - organisation, leadership and theories.

    Performance alone is the best measure of your confidence, competence, and courage. Only performance gives you the freedom to grow as yourself. Just remember that: performance is your reality. Forget everything else. That is why my definition of a manager is what it is: one who turns in the performance.

  1. Analysis of my leadership. Awareness and Assessment: My Leader Self-Insights. Integrated summary of ...

    is that whatever timetable I am making according to the course works I have left for my assignments or coursework's there is always a gap as I always finish either one or two days after the deadline of whatever timetable I have made as whatever I have thought the way

  2. Comparing Leadership styles of Western and Asian Managers.

    select some predetermined content and transmit it t? passive students, whose 'learning' ?f this material is conceptualised in terms ?f memorization, abstract understanding and behavioural replication. Th? intellectual roots ?f this teaching paradigm can be traced back t? positivism (an expert transmitting knowledge t?

  1. Social Learning Theory, Generation Y, and the Situational Leadership Model

    in which the imitator or observer receives no actual reinforcement but imitates the behavior solely based on the fact that the model was praised or reinforced for the behavior. This rings true, as well, for punishments. When the observer sees that the model is being punished for a behavior, the

  2. Who is a teacher-leader? How can teacher leadership be defined? What are the qualities ...

    Williams noted she was overly concerned with teaching basic skills. As Williams states "If the white middle-class students don't know grammar, it is likely to be overlooked, but if poor black students make grammatical mistakes, more than likely it will be seen as a language deficiency or lack of native intelligence"(p.186).

  1. The Leadership Grid and Situational Leadership.

    Fiedler's Contingency Model is based on the assumption that mangers have one dominant leadership style that is resistant to change. Therefore, structural changes in the situation improve a manager's chances of success. Three dimensions of situational control identified by Fiedler are Leader-Member relations, Task Structure, and Position Power.

  2. Critically evaluate historical, classical and contemporary approaches to leadership theory.

    They insisted on the unity of the team, motivation and confidence of people for the effective results. They used both directive/task focused and supportive/ people-focused attitude. Again, Greenbury and Salesbury are considered as autocratic where Rose played a role of a consultive leader. Bostock was democratic in his leadership approach.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work