• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Compare and contrast TWO modern recruitment/selection methods (e.g. psychometric tests) with more traditional systems (e.g. individual interviews).

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Compare and contrast TWO modern recruitment/selection methods (e.g. psychometric tests) with more traditional systems (e.g. individual interviews). To what extent do the innovative techniques overcome the problems inherent in traditional methods of recruiting and selecting staff? To put this title into context, the importance of recruitment and selection must be outlined. It is clear, from the literature and from my own personal experiences, that recruitment and selection are a crucial element of Human Resource Management (HRM). Regardless of size, it is essential to employ an effective recruitment and selection procedure. According to Marchington and Wilkinson (2002: p277), recruitment and selection have become a highly sophisticated practice of HR; consultants and organisational psychologists have been employed to ensure companies have made valid and reliable selection decisions (Marchington and Wilkinson, 2002). This essay will compare and contrast psychometric testing and online recruitment against traditional methods. Furthermore, it will assess how the modern recruitment and selection methods have overcome the problems inherent in traditional methods of recruiting and selecting staff. Selection is the process of discriminating between the pool of candidates which have been recruited. This can be in the form of references, interviews, tests and assessment centres etc (Lecture Notes). On the other hand, recruitment is essentially a pre-requisite of selection; it involves the searching for candidates (be it internal or external) for job vacancies. This involves communicating with actual or potential job seekers, and motivating them to apply. Hence, the objective is to attract the right candidates in the right number (Brunel University). Having defined the terms, we can compare and contrast the two methods against traditional systems. Psychometric testing is a series of written or practical tests, which assess a clearly defined sample of human behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

Having used the new selection methods, West Sussex County Council saw a marked improvement in labour turnover rates as they selected the right candidates for the job (Employers Organisation for Local Government). In terms of accuracy, psychometric testing solves the problems of interviews and references. During an interview, the interviewer must rely on the candidate's honesty in answering certain questions, also many line mangers can write inaccurate references. In cognitive ability tests, mental ability can be measured accurately as the candidate cannot lie about anything. The most the candidate can do is lie (www.Toolpack.com). Meta-analysis demonstrates that psychometric testing scores higher in terms of validity, compared to other selection methods. This analysis is a process of combining many individual studies in order to show a typical picture. One much reported set of findings is that of Dr. Mike Smith of UMIST: (Perfect prediction) 1.0 0.9 0.8 0.7 Assessment centres (promotion) 0.6 Work sample tests 0.5 Ability tests 0.4 Assessment centres (performance), biodata, personality questionnaires 0.3 Structured interviews 0.2 Typical interviews 0.1 References 0 Astrology, graphology (Chance prediction) Fig. 1 (Source: Smith, 1986) From the table it is clear that psychometric testing scores higher in terms of validity compared to interviews. When it comes to solving interview bias, psychometric testing has been criticised for its effectiveness. According to Bach and Sissons (2002), black males do not do as well as others in cognitive tests. As a result, the tests do have an element of discrimination. Also, the premise that personality tests provide a profile of a candidate's personality in order to assess their suitability for the job, results in stereotyping. This does not help solve the problems inherent in interviews. ...read more.

Conclusion

There is no point implementing a sophisticated online recruitment system for a bricklaying company trying to recruit a bricklayer. From the analysis of this essay, online recruitment does go far in solving the problems of traditional recruitment; however, it is not an ultimate panacea for every company concerned, as some organisations do not need it as much as others do. No selection method, unfortunately, can perfectly predict later job success, although some assessment centres can be very good at this. From the analysis, the best single methods, however, are psychometric tests - work sample tests and ability tests. Personality questionnaires, another form of psychometric instrument, can also be very effective. Interviews tend to be less effective, especially the typical biographical interview. Other methods, such as astrology or graphology (handwriting analysis) seem to be no better or worse than chance. Psychometric tests are very popular now, and are very accurate when assessing ability and comparing other candidate's scores. In this regard, they go a very long way in solving the problems inherent in unstructured interviews. However, the vast majority of organisations still use interviews. One can rightly say that structured interviews increase the validity of unstructured interviews, as set questions are asked. Similar to recruitment, an organisation must assess what method is useful for them; there is no point in carrying out psychometric testing for a company trying to recruit a factory worker. In this situation, psychometric testing is no use to the company. However, when used for recruiting graduates, the innovative techniques go far in solving the problems of accuracy and validity. Finally, it is recommended that no selection method should be used on its own. In that sense, psychometric testing is not a panacea to all selection problems; it is only very effective when used as part of a jigsaw combining other methods such as interviews and references etc. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Resource Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Resource Management essays

  1. "Why is effective recruitment and selection important to organisations? Which selection techniques are the ...

    have their workforce to the highest quality and does not matter about the costs as long as they have got a high workforce that can be flexible. It will be more likely that big organisations that incur much more profits will be able to spend that extra amount of money

  2. Recruitment and Selection

    Thus, human resource managers need to take in account the line managers and their set objectives and strategies, as well as the workforce. In planning for recruitment and selection procedures, HR managers need to ensure that they work towards an integration of overall strategy in the company.

  1. I have written a detailed description for a recruitment and retention process of John ...

    Education and qualifications John Lewis will also include details about the level of qualifications and experience that the job requires, e.g. graduate. Such information may also be included in the person specification. Name of compiler and approver This is the person who designed and agreed the job.

  2. Concept of Validity and Reliability in Relation to Selection of Staff.

    The selection process would be objective and fair for all candidates, irrespective of gender, ethnic background, disability or age and should be carried out by well trained staff for its effectiveness. A training programme will be provided to support the implementation of any selection processes to ensure that best practice

  1. Human Resource Management: Development, Activities, Planning and Recruitment

    Carry out regular safety inspections in own department. May take initial disciplinary action against those who infringe health and safety rules. Disciplining individuals- Conduct informal disciplinary interview with own staff if necessary. Issue formal warnings as outlined in disciplinary procedure. Maintains records of warnings issued. Dealing with grievances- Deal initially with grievances raised by employees in his or her department.

  2. Part A of this report will examine my learning styles, preferences, highlight any areas ...

    schools are increasingly looking to Gardner's theories to explain many of the behaviours exhibited in learners. These tests results must not be used to pigeonhole the learner, however, rather used to develop the areas of least preferred learning style and improve upon the most preferred areas (Evans and Sadler-Smith, 2006; Coffield et al, 2004).

  1. Context of Employee Relations and Industrial Conflict

    What interests does each party represent? What are each player's values, personality, feelings and resources? Your chances of success in managing a conflict will be greatly enhanced if you can view the conflict through the eyes of the conflicting parties. * Assess the source of conflict Conflicts have causes.

  2. This report seeks to explore the different recruitment and selection approaches in human resource ...

    "External recruitment is when an org. seeks to bring in someone from outside to fill a vacancy (MBAlib, 2010)." The advantages are the company will have new employees and new ideas. It is good for innovation, and improves the competition. The disadvantages are the new employees need the training; it will spend a lot time and money.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work