• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Corporate citizenship is not an effective substitute for corporate social responsibility. Discuss. In order to put forward a reasonable argument for the above suggestion, this discussion must focus

Extracts from this document...


[22123] Issues in Business/Trade Law List B 5. Corporate citizenship is not an effective substitute for corporate social responsibility. Discuss. In order to put forward a reasonable argument for the above suggestion, this discussion must focus on both defining corporate citizenship, and corporate social responsibility (where possible), to be able to distinguish between the two, and to understand how each function in practice. With a discussion title such as this, we must look at both the benefits (and weaknesses) of using either of the above independently or together. Therein, in order to establish the effectiveness of the two, we should identify what businesses and governments as a whole are trying to achieve with concepts such as corporate social responsibility and corporate citizenship. Furthermore, it will be useful to research the history of the two, how it has developed and examples of it doing so, and where both corporate establishments and academics alike see the future of social responsibility leading. In the following debate, I shall question and determine that corporate social responsibility1 and corporate citizenship2 are incredibly useful to firms and businesses, and that the best framework to have in a modern society is for a company to use a mixture of the two to achieve the best results for all parties involved. However before we can ascertain which of the above mentioned a company should look to incorporating; we should take each individually in order to further understand how they work or do not as the case may be. The first problem that we should consider is that when it comes to defining CSR and CC, there are no actual clear definitions3. ...read more.


Faced with this kind of social protest, a few farsighted business executives advised corporations to use their power and influence voluntarily for broad social purposes rather than for profits alone. Automaker Henry Ford developed programs to support the recreational and health needs for his employees19, prompting initially internal strategies, but ultimately CSR and CC outside of the business sphere. The point to note is that company leaders believed that the business had a responsibility to society that went beyond, or worked in parallel with their efforts to make profits, and began to consider interests other than just shareholders.20 Not only did this prompt regulatory review on matters21, but paved the way for developed paternalistic programmes found internally and externally in relation to social responsibility. Companies became keener to move away from just giving money to charity, known as the charity principle22, or as being a trustee to the public's interest, referred to as the stewardship principle23. These two early principles established the original meaning of CSR. It became apparent as suggested that private institutions who were exercising a degree of public power, required some level of accountability and responsibility for their actions. Measures existed, and continue to do so, to help maintain a degree of control over firms, and their directors, in the sense of legislation24, common law25, and shareholder rights to limit directors' power26, yet a great deal of these are internal, or only affect a company decision in the extreme cases. Therein, there was limited law or rulings available for the checks and balances regarding legitimate business decisions in an external context. Moreover, governments were unenthusiastic to introduce stringent business law, as they wanted to maintain good relations with the firms that were working within their countries, whom contributed to the economy. ...read more.


The degree that both CSR and CC have achieved their objectives therein depends on the level of priority the individual company gives to each. In this way, government initiatives are one of the best ways at present to enable companies to understand, and to act on social accountability and responsibility. The sense of responsibility therefore still seems to be very much a broad concept. Through the introduction of the Global Compact firms must now respond to social responsibility and account for actions therein.36 Yet however, without sufficient enforcement policies, the Global Compact will always be unable to fully account for business practices, negating the real reason of its purpose. CC and CSR should not necessarily be theories that should work independently in order to achieve responsibility and accountability. Through a successful implementation in a business context, both could quite easily be adhered to, with a minimal loss of profit. As suggested, using either CC or CSR could either benefit the company or hinder it financially, but ultimately both can compliment each other. In this way firms should try to look at social responsibility not necessarily in a pure economical way, but also ethically. Especially in a modern context with increased media and activist group attention on all activities that businesses carry out. As suggested the main reason supporting the two theories is to try and ascertain a higher level of accountability. Both theories can achieve this function, but only as far as the company is willing to adhere to it. Subsequently until further regulations exist it should be suggested that both compliment each other in trying to achieve the goal of responsibility and accountability. CC seems to still be in an early phase of development, and perhaps with effective compliance and monitoring, it can become what CSR tried to accomplish. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. The global business environment and its impact on Nestle.

    and wants through the Human resources and recruitment section and by personally interviewing the employees which will actually satisfy them. > Government and organizational performance * Furthermore the managers can gain information of its employees through the government and by analyzing the organizational performance also; the relevant parties can gain information regarding the employee satisfaction etc within the organization.

  2. Leadership Theories - this review seeks to determine which theoretical perspectives, theories and schools ...

    Table 1 displays a non-exhaustive list of leadership theories. These theories span from thoughts of early theorists in the eighteenths and beginning of the nineteenth century (e.g. great man theories), when leadership was explained as an innate characteristic of great figures in History (Bass, 1990), to recent conceptualizations that view leadership as a collective endeavor (e.g., shared and distributed leadership).

  1. What is CSR? To what extent is there a business case for CSR?

    engaging in CSR can bring significant synergy to a company (Briggs & Verma, 2006). CSR Network's list of 10 benefits of CSR for businesses is: 1. Increase profits 2. Access to capital 3. Reduced operating cost/ increase operating efficiency 4.

  2. Metabical Co. Pricing policy Case Study. In order to profitably satisfy customer needs, ...

    Using linear regression (only on the data from 1992 and later), we extrapolate the expected amount of adults in the US for the 5 following years (the time period, after which we assume the drug will cease to be marketed), as can be seen in Figure 1.

  1. Cadbury Corporate Social Responsibility. This essay examine the performance of Cadbury and how they ...

    with reducing the usage of packaging and the emission of carbon dioxide; they have also successfully saved 4 millions litre of water per year (Cadbury-Purple goes green 2008). For the next two years, they have a further target which is to ensure the packaging they used is 60% biodegradable.

  2. Innovation For Business Success. It is possible to be innovative in both large ...

    However in recent years, these 82 | P a g e initiatives have been evaluated as they contribute to the overall picture of risk and return/ profitability. Three examples are: 1. Refractory gold processing, in which the effectiveness of gold yields can be increased.

  1. General Management - organisation, leadership and theories.

    It includes social, demographic, and economic factors that influence all organizations about equally. Increases in the inflation rate or the percentage of dual-career couples in the work force are part of the organization's general environment. These events do not directly change day-to-day operations, but they do affect all organizations eventually.

  2. Management principles and theories and their application to the construction industry.

    Committee, with the objective of enhancing confidence in the integrity of the processes and procedures relating to internal control and corporate financial reporting. This includes a continuous review of the financial internal reporting systems and the work of the external auditor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work