Critically assess the contention that the introduction of new technologies into an organisation inevitably leads to deskilling

Authors Avatar

Critically assess the contention that the introduction of new technologies into an organisation inevitably leads to deskilling.

Although the deskilling debate only started in 1974, when Harry Braverman’s thesis, Labour and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century was published, the causes for the argument had begun many years earlier, in the 1890’s with the introduction of F.W Taylor’s ideas for reorganising work.

Braverman (1920-1976) was a sheet metal worker, and a member of the American Communist party. It was his background in skilled trades that allowed him to analyse the changes that were taking place. As it was Braverman that first came up with the theory of deskilling, it is his definition that should be considered. His definition says that:

skill represents the central asset possessed by workers, and that modern capitalist systems of work design, like Taylorism, degrade or deskill work, as a means of controlling and cheapening it.’ (Braverman, 1974).

This Marxist analysis was a direct challenge to the long accepted views and implemented methods of Taylor. Braverman also argued that new technologies play a vital role in deskilling, and by working on new technologies workers 'build for themselves more "modern", more "scientific", more dehumanised prisons of labour'.

Taylor was an American engineer, who developed the idea of Scientific Management over 100 years ago. His principles of organising and controlling work recommended to managers that complex tasks needed to be split up into the maximum number of subtasks possible (Fincham & Rhodes, 2005). There were other recommendations given by Taylor, namely the ‘divorce of conception from execution’. This told managers that ‘All possible brainwork should be removed from the shop and centred in the planning or laying out department’ (Braverman 1974:113)

It was this that Braverman heavily criticised, and so it must be looked at how the introduction of new technologies could cause this to happen.

One of the best known and earliest examples of Taylorism in practice in the workplace is at General Motors plants at the start of the last century. By using Taylor’s methods, and introducing the assembly line, output increased from 8,700 in 1906 to 34,000 in 1911, 300,000 in 1914, rising to 1.9 million in 1923. (Tolliday & Zeitlin, 1992)

These massive increases in production came without the use of skilled labour, by 1914, over half the workforce were Southern and Eastern European immigrants, many of whom had no relevant experience, and spoke little or no English (Meyer, 1981). It would therefore seem like the introduction of new technology that caused the giant increases in output did not affect all workers in terms of deskilling, the majority of workers would probably have become more skilled due to their employment. However, labour turnover was at 370% and 71% of these workers left within their first week. These workers were probably most likely to be the unskilled immigrant workers that did not have the reliance on their wages that American workers had for their families. Therefore perhaps deskilling was less prominent than it would first seem due to the introduction of new technology and the assembly line.

Join now!

However, we must also consider why labour turnover was so high at Fords’ production plants in the early 1910s. Assembly line work is notoriously boring, partly due to the removal of creativity and craft from the workers, which much have been demoralising as these workers had initially been employed for having these qualities. Therefore, the high labour turnover experienced may have been due to workers leaving due to the deskilling that was evidently in existence, and them moving to other production industries that had not yet implemented new technologies.

There are also recent examples of the introduction of new ...

This is a preview of the whole essay