• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically compare and contrast 'hard' and 'soft' models of human resource management.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically compare and contrast 'hard' and 'soft' models of human resource management. Human resource management (HRM) initially emerged in the US in the 1980's and then extended into the UK. (Morris et al. 2000). It has been described as an evolving set of competing theories (Pinnington and Edwards, 2000) and a group of interrelated policies with an ideological and philosophical underpinning (Guest, 1991). Writers have developed many definitions for HRM; Armstrong (1999) defined it as 'the strategic approach to acquiring, developing, managing, motivating and gaining the commitment of the organisations key resource - the people who work in it and for it' (p 13). Storey (1992) suggested that it is a 'distinctive approach to employment management which seeks to achieve competitive advantage through the strategic deployment of a highly committed and capable workforce, using an integrated array of cultural, structural and personnel techniques' (p 5). There have been many differing views by writers on the subject, as to what exactly HRM is, such as questioning whether it is a practice, a philosophy or a theory (Legge, 1995). In many cases writers are cautious not to describe HRM as a theory, but they do however offer various models to describe approaches to HRM. Some of these approaches are normative (e.g. Legge, 1995), others are theoretical and derived form literature (e.g. Guest, 1989) and others are empirically derived (e.g. Storey, 1992). Although there are a number of models, there has been little success achieving a fully-fledged theory due to complexities in terminology; lack of generalisation; contradictions and failure to provide any predictive capability (Truss, 1999) ...read more.

Middle

Storey (1992) stated that "it is human capability and commitment which distinguishes successful organisations...the human resource ought to be nurtured" (p.26). If commitment is to be retained HRM needs to train and develop their employees. This idea is emphasised within the soft model. The need to retain knowledge workers is one of the biggest challenges, which faces organisations today. In America, Ford offered a PC, printer and Internet access to all employees for $5 a month. The idea was that by being able to communicate amongst themselves much more easily, being more able to use the computers at work and becoming more acquainted with the mindset of the e-consumer, that it would make the whole organisation much more customer focused. (Johnson and Scholes, 2002) By training and developing employees there is a potential to create a win-win situation, with employees gaining job security, interesting work and an improved work-life balance, with the best organisations gaining competitive advantage from the best workers (Peter Drucker, 1988, cited in Johnson and Scholes, 2002). Individual development, flexibility, self-fulfilment, high trust, autonomy and adaptability are all aspects that are closely associated with the 'soft' model (Morris et al. 2000). There has been some criticism of these concepts, which the soft model adopts. It has been argued the concepts of commitment, flexibility and quality are somewhat ambiguous and open to debate and interpretation (Purcell, 1993). Flexibility has been noted to come in a number of different forms; it could be to 'express the value of employee upskilling, development and initiative or the numerical and financial flexibility to be achieved by treating labour as a variable cost-to-be-minimised input' (Atkinson, 1984 cited in Legge, 1995). ...read more.

Conclusion

The main assumptions on which the soft approach is based such as flexibility, commitment and quality have been argued by critics to be ambiguous and open to debate. In many instances it is unclear as to what exactly the model is referring to when it uses these concepts. They can take the form of many different meanings and interpretations and if interpreted wrongly can even finish up with a practice, which is hard in approach rather than soft. These three concepts were also viewed by critics as being incompatible and difficult to achieve in practice. This is a major factor that needs to be considered when models are being developed, they may work theoretically but do they work in practice. There are many conflicts and tensions that are evident between these two models such as the soft placing emphasis on self-expression and high trust and the hard model emphasises direction and low trust, this makes it extremely difficult to place the two together in a single model. They both consider strategic integration between business strategies and the HR policies but from conflicting viewpoints. At present the literature is incomplete making it difficult for a single model of HRM to be developed. The flaws in the current models either soft or hard are evident and further work needs to be carried out to clarify exactly what each of the terms within the models is referring to. They're a number of weaknesses within the models and these need to be considered and improved. If there was more clarity within the models then perhaps it would be possible to even take elements that are positive from each to create an overall model or theory, which could be used in practice. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Resource Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Resource Management essays

  1. The Role Of Human Resource Management. Theories and Case Study of HRM ...

    The 8 S's Model Structure Systems and Processes Strategy and purposes Shared Values Style Strategic Performance reSources Staff Source: J. M. Higgins. "The Eight 'S's of Successful Strategy Execution", Journal of Change Management, Vol. 5, No. 1, P.6 but the diagram is in (Management, Hellriegel et al; 2008: 14).

  2. Compare and contrast two models of HRM, one of which must be the Harvard ...

    consequences would then be dependant on how effective the HR policy and HR outcomes are which in turn would go back to the effect on the stakeholders for example dividends, bonuses, projects and policy changes etc The model has evolved through different takes on the model by different theorists.

  1. The conventional approaches to Stress management are employee counselling, stress management and reducing employee ...

    The findings were quite impressive. Of the 87% of staff who suffered from job stress, an amazing 62% of them felt they were more productive at work after undergoing a series of training sessions ranging from relaxation skills to dietary advice10.

  2. Critically discuss the Best Fit approach to strategic human resource management (HRM)

    This risky cost-controlling strategy will lead to overhead decrease. This strategy assumes effective mass production and wage cut to save costs. M&S human resource strategy involved the following practices. Relatively fixed and explicit job descriptions that lead to employee's relatively repetitive and predictable behaviours.

  1. Human resource management in Carrefour

    Carrefour is doing that by thinking new training projects. Carrefour is aiming to stimulate intercultural communication facilitate new employee exchange between collaborators from different countries , sending employees abroad through exchange programs which can share experiences with others. Carrefour also believes in teenage power. In 1999 a group of 20 young Romanian graduates was trained for 9 months in

  2. To what extent is HRM different from conventional Personnel Management? Is it the same ...

    A manager himself does not operate a machine, design products, or wait on customers (except in an emergency). He creates the environment in which employees can work effectively to accomplish the goals of the enterprise and at the same time obtain substantial satisfaction of their needs".

  1. Cape Breton Wallcoverings - HRM analysis

    The company should consider is to offer some sort of personal and group incentive plans to workers so that they would be encourages to produce more, lessen the amount of mistakes, produce higher quality products and that the employees would be interested to use their private time to study the trade to fasten the learning curve.

  2. Human resource management - Microsoft problems and recommendatins

    Challenges to be faced 1. The method is weighty. Human resource department will have to work a lot even to explain the process to the employees and to give justifications on this. 2. Top performers may resist this on the basis of unfair approach.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work