• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically compare and contrast 'hard' and 'soft' models of human resource management.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Critically compare and contrast 'hard' and 'soft' models of human resource management. Human resource management (HRM) initially emerged in the US in the 1980's and then extended into the UK. (Morris et al. 2000). It has been described as an evolving set of competing theories (Pinnington and Edwards, 2000) and a group of interrelated policies with an ideological and philosophical underpinning (Guest, 1991). Writers have developed many definitions for HRM; Armstrong (1999) defined it as 'the strategic approach to acquiring, developing, managing, motivating and gaining the commitment of the organisations key resource - the people who work in it and for it' (p 13). Storey (1992) suggested that it is a 'distinctive approach to employment management which seeks to achieve competitive advantage through the strategic deployment of a highly committed and capable workforce, using an integrated array of cultural, structural and personnel techniques' (p 5). There have been many differing views by writers on the subject, as to what exactly HRM is, such as questioning whether it is a practice, a philosophy or a theory (Legge, 1995). In many cases writers are cautious not to describe HRM as a theory, but they do however offer various models to describe approaches to HRM. Some of these approaches are normative (e.g. Legge, 1995), others are theoretical and derived form literature (e.g. Guest, 1989) and others are empirically derived (e.g. Storey, 1992). Although there are a number of models, there has been little success achieving a fully-fledged theory due to complexities in terminology; lack of generalisation; contradictions and failure to provide any predictive capability (Truss, 1999) ...read more.

Middle

Storey (1992) stated that "it is human capability and commitment which distinguishes successful organisations...the human resource ought to be nurtured" (p.26). If commitment is to be retained HRM needs to train and develop their employees. This idea is emphasised within the soft model. The need to retain knowledge workers is one of the biggest challenges, which faces organisations today. In America, Ford offered a PC, printer and Internet access to all employees for $5 a month. The idea was that by being able to communicate amongst themselves much more easily, being more able to use the computers at work and becoming more acquainted with the mindset of the e-consumer, that it would make the whole organisation much more customer focused. (Johnson and Scholes, 2002) By training and developing employees there is a potential to create a win-win situation, with employees gaining job security, interesting work and an improved work-life balance, with the best organisations gaining competitive advantage from the best workers (Peter Drucker, 1988, cited in Johnson and Scholes, 2002). Individual development, flexibility, self-fulfilment, high trust, autonomy and adaptability are all aspects that are closely associated with the 'soft' model (Morris et al. 2000). There has been some criticism of these concepts, which the soft model adopts. It has been argued the concepts of commitment, flexibility and quality are somewhat ambiguous and open to debate and interpretation (Purcell, 1993). Flexibility has been noted to come in a number of different forms; it could be to 'express the value of employee upskilling, development and initiative or the numerical and financial flexibility to be achieved by treating labour as a variable cost-to-be-minimised input' (Atkinson, 1984 cited in Legge, 1995). ...read more.

Conclusion

The main assumptions on which the soft approach is based such as flexibility, commitment and quality have been argued by critics to be ambiguous and open to debate. In many instances it is unclear as to what exactly the model is referring to when it uses these concepts. They can take the form of many different meanings and interpretations and if interpreted wrongly can even finish up with a practice, which is hard in approach rather than soft. These three concepts were also viewed by critics as being incompatible and difficult to achieve in practice. This is a major factor that needs to be considered when models are being developed, they may work theoretically but do they work in practice. There are many conflicts and tensions that are evident between these two models such as the soft placing emphasis on self-expression and high trust and the hard model emphasises direction and low trust, this makes it extremely difficult to place the two together in a single model. They both consider strategic integration between business strategies and the HR policies but from conflicting viewpoints. At present the literature is incomplete making it difficult for a single model of HRM to be developed. The flaws in the current models either soft or hard are evident and further work needs to be carried out to clarify exactly what each of the terms within the models is referring to. They're a number of weaknesses within the models and these need to be considered and improved. If there was more clarity within the models then perhaps it would be possible to even take elements that are positive from each to create an overall model or theory, which could be used in practice. 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Human Resource Management section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Human Resource Management essays

  1. Compare and contrast two models of HRM, one of which must be the Harvard ...

    consequences would then be dependant on how effective the HR policy and HR outcomes are which in turn would go back to the effect on the stakeholders for example dividends, bonuses, projects and policy changes etc The model has evolved through different takes on the model by different theorists.

  2. The Role Of Human Resource Management. Theories and Case Study of HRM ...

    over time (Robbins et Coulter, 1996 was referenced in Human Resource Management, Amos et al, 2008:3). It is an open system because it does not exist and function in isolation but is influenced by external factors namely political, economic, social, technological, environmental and legal.

  1. Critically discuss the Best Fit approach to strategic human resource management (HRM)

    In addition narrow job design created monotonous work and caused a short term focus and de-motivation. And minimal levels of employee training and development that was crucial and caused concern for quality and overall results. This shows that lack of investment in employees leads to failure.

  2. HRM best practise case study. Research into HRM at a branch of Barclays ...

    High compensation contingent on organisational performance There are two types to this factor and they are larger than the average compensation and performance related reward. This sometimes sends indication to employees which makes them think that they deserve the plenty of rewards for the work that they have done but

  1. Human Resource Management: Development, Activities, Planning and Recruitment

    Recommended actions:- * Evaluate recruitment and selection practices in light of the organisation's strategic objectives * Develop and implement a comprehensive workplace skills plan (with a thorough training needs analysis) * Implement a learner ship strategy * Adopt or clarify occupational levels and category classifications Investing in human resource development

  2. Barriers to Effective Human Resource Management

    On the other hand if top management believe that subordinates or employee should have should have considerable voice in the matters concerning their jobs and job conditions, certainly this believe will be found at every level. So in this way top management policies and believes go down through the organisation and result quit different consequences.

  1. Human resource management - Microsoft problems and recommendatins

    Paul Maritz resigned in 2000. A lot of Microsoft insiders look back at the departure of Paul Maritz in 2000 as the beginning of Microsoft's brain drain over the last decade. Maritz was influential in Microsoft's early days, and at one point had control over nearly all Microsoft products, but his duties were gradually reduced after Steve Ballmer became President and later CEO.

  2. Cape Breton Wallcoverings - HRM analysis

    Firstly if there are no higher positions free, the workers may feel oppressed in their position and this may lead to low work moral. The case may be that already very qualified assistant can feel that the job is not challenging enough, and in hopes of more pay or more challenges, may decide to leave the company.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work