• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Critically examine the managerial implications of employee engagement

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Assignment Topic: ?Critically examine managerial implications of employee engagement.? Introduction Organizations have usually depend on upon monetary methods or statistics to assess their value, performance and health, yet recently organizations have come to realize the importance of people-centred indicators such as employee traits, perceptions and attitudes can be essential predictors of employee performance and behaviour (Luthans and Peterson 2002, 376). Employee engagement has come to be a popular and broadly used term, there have been various claims that an engaged employee can provide organizations with competitive advantages (Rich, Lepine and Crawford 2010, 617). Although much has been written on the subject, there is still very little research done on how managers, in particular, can influence engagement and how it can be used to improve satisfaction and productivity among employees and overall organizational performance. The purpose of this essay is to critically examine the managerial implications of employee engagement, with the use of empirical and theoretical data previously done to help us support this concept and better understand organizational behaviour. What is Employee Engagement? There have been various and often irregular meanings regarding employee engagement in the academic literature that has resulted in the term becoming confusing to many. Kahn (1990, 694) was the first to describe engagement as ?the coupling of an employee?s full self in terms of cognitive, emotional and physical vitalities to work role performances?. His research concluded that a personally engaged person was someone who is physically involved in tasks, cognitively vigilant and emphatically connected to others. ...read more.

Middle

Kahn (1990) proposed in his study that high rankings of engagement led to both optimistic outcomes for individuals and the organization in terms of productivity and profitability. The Gallup Organization (2004) also found critical associations between employee engagement, customer loyalty, business growth and profitability, showcasing 18% higher productivity in their top-quartile business units as compared to the bottom-quartile business units. These studies support the link between employee engagement and customer loyalty. Southwest Airlines is a prime example of the connection amid engaged employees and customer?s influences customer loyalty and satisfaction. The corporation?s success is largely due to their customer loyalty; the company did this by creating a blog for its workers and customers to freely voice their opinions and continues to encourage them to produce videos conveying their feelings of the company (Gonring 2008, 31). This validates the fact that employee engagement is important to an organizations success by improving productivity and gaining customer loyalty. This is especially true for the service sector where employees come face-to-face with customers. Organizations have come to realize that it is much more costly to hire new people and believe that by training and developing current employees, this would produce feelings of being valued at the organization and is a more influential reason for them to stay. Studies have revealed that highly engaged employees are less likely to turnover and be absent from work. Schaufeli and Bakker (2004, 307) found that there was a negative correlation between and turnover intent and simplified the connection between turnover intention and job resources. ...read more.

Conclusion

KIA Motors is also another prime example of how leadership and engagement are connected. KIA Motors HR department realized that senior and middle management played crucial roles in constructing an engaged workforce, so managers were showed on a series of training courses to develop management skills and were tested before and after training using the same 360-degree tool (Tomlinson 2010, 28). Results showed a 14% average increase in manager performance and the scores have been maintained proving the sustainability of the courses. Therefore, to improve engagement among employee?s; managers must be confident in their skills as leaders and create a supportive and inclusive environment where communication and feedback is frequently exchanged and employees can share opinions on decisions as opposed to managers being ignorant and narrow-minded. Conclusion The purpose of this essay was to critically examine the managerial implications of employee engagement. From the readings, it was determined that employee engagement is a useful tool for organizations in terms of motivation, organizational performance, focus, staff retention as well as profitability, in addition manager?s play an important and imperative role in implementing and influencing employee engagement through their behaviours and leadership capabilities and they should be aware of disengagement issues before it becomes a significant problem as can be seen in the various studies conducted. However, the studies did not confirm that the same type of engagement approaches could be applied in every department. In conclusion, employee engagement is a relevant concept for managers to use and the factors which drive employee engagement should be formalized into strategies for the organizations management team to utilize in increasing performance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Management Studies section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Management Studies essays

  1. General Management - organisation, leadership and theories.

    Heavily task oriented people display these characteristics: they are very strong on schedules; they expect people to do what they are told without question or debate; when something goes wrong they tend to focus on who is to blame rather than concentrate on exactly what is wrong and how to

  2. Innovation For Business Success. It is possible to be innovative in both large ...

    A key to the behaviour is genchi genbutsu (go to the source), we practice humility as a key point. Innovation is expected. " (Toyota Australia plant manager). Some key messages from Toyota Australia managers are that despite their accomplishments, complacency is guarded against.

  1. Workplace Behaviour Reflective Journal

    They would rather be 'Facebooking' with friends (belongingness and love needs) rather than socialize with the rest of the staff during breaks. During meetings, they can be rather blunt with their comments and display impatience (esteem needs) inadvertently irking some of the older staff members.

  2. Reducing world's energy demand : Positive aftereffects and future implications. Term paper in ...

    Looking at this circle diagram it is obvious that the world's energy supply highly depends on Crude Oil, Natural Gas and Coal. More than 75% of the supplied energy depends on these 3 factors. The abbreviation NGPL stands for Natural Gas Plant Liquids, and therefore doesn't belong to renewable energies.

  1. Identify various decisions that may be taken by managers at different managerial levels at ...

    Moreover, top managers are ultimately responsible for the performance of the organization, and often, these managers have very visible jobs. The top level has small number of people but their strategy greatest effect on success of Vietnam Airline. * After the meeting between the CEO of Vietnam Airline with the

  2. Manager, Management & Managerial Roles

    But, due to cultural, environmental and organizational influences personnel holding managerial position of an organization in different countries take part in different movements without being aware of that they are basically conducting different managerial roles. INTERPERSONAL ROLES Figurehead According to the figurehead roles managers are the Symbolic leader of the organization performing duties of social and legal character (Mintzberg, 1973).

  1. Career Management and Organizational Commitment Among Graduates.

    It involves two main behaviors: one relating to continuous improvement in one's current job . . . and the other related to movement-job mobility preparedness' (Kossek, Roberts, Fisher, & Demarr, 1998, p. 938). Organizational career management and career self-management are not mutually exclusive; indeed the former may help to promote the latter.

  2. Key Theory for Internal Corporate Communication in the Context of Employee Engagement: The ...

    If it turns out that the opinion to be dominant, they are likely to voice it boldly. Otherwise, they are more likely to be silent due to environmental pressure. Actually, in the real world, this cognition almost exists in everyone?s mind, especially when they are in workplace.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work