Graph 1.1.
Typical survivor and organisational outcomes of redundancy (Source: adapted from Appelbaum & Donia, 2001).
Every organisation passing through cutbacks has its own agents or messengers called envoys – ‘people who break news of redundancy to their colleagues’ (Ashman, 2012). It is generally considered that the role of envoy is emotionally demanding. Envoys’ role does not have negative effects on health, however as a research has shown that many envoys acknowledged that they drank more alcohol during downsizing activities (Ashman, 2012). Majority admitted that the closer their relationships with the victims the more pressured role became. Envoys must take part in organisations decision regarding their role in downsizing and have to be aware of the reason of redundancy within the company. Moreover envoys should be selected voluntarily. Professional trainings and programmes should be provided by the company which need to cover emotionally challenging aspects of the job.
A set of shared reactions and the emotional, psychological and organisational effects experienced by those who remain employed or survive the job loss process (Brockner, 1992).
Survivor syndrome is known by many as common outcome of downsizing which entails psychological and the emotional consequence to survivors. The organisational results will never be only financial in despite of the motivations and organisational change. By performing such procedures, organisations might achieve several goals, but it also has adverse effects which survivors may feel on an organisational and individual level. The adverse effects may involve:
- Low morale and commitment
- Increased absence
- Performance issues
Survivors are those that remain after a significant cut and who share feelings of job insecurity leading to loss of commitment, feelings of injustice or inequity, stress and burnout (Brockner et al, 1986). Leaving employees are more packaged with days off, redeployment, outplacement and etc. when little is given for the survivors. Survivors are likely to judge the commitment and concern for terminated employees as a reflection of what they may experience if and when further downsizing moves are made (Thornhill and Gibbons, 1995). It is essential to uphold relationship between all employees. There are rarely any negative organizational consequences for giving early advance notice of the changes that are planned (Leana and Feldman, 1994). It refers trust and commitment of organization. If employer involves its employees in organization’s future plans, development and change employees subconsciously trust their employer and perform a higher level of responsibility.
Graph 1.2.
Emtional clusters of redundancy survivors (Noer,2009)
There are two theories which endeavoured to clarify essence of Survivor Syndrome – Becker’s Side Bet Theory 1960 and Burke’s Identity Theory 1991. Both theories consider that the level of performance within the organisation can be as a result of employer and employees relationship in the organisation. Beckers’s Side Bet Theory suggests that individuals make psychological and emotinal investment in organisations which lost when leaving. The psychological cost increases overtime as the investment increases. The theory would put forward on a hunch that employees who have been for a long time within the company will have considerable impact by Survivor Syndrome. Even so, sometimes employees at a later age or phase might consider it positively and be ready to retire earlier. Moreover younger generation among the employees may be effected as well.
Alternative method is Identity Theory (Burke,1991) that suggests the impact on well-being from external stress may be moderated by psychological relevance ,it has to the individuals’ role identity. In accordance to this, the theory shows relationship that the greater importance a person places on their job as form of self-identification, the greater the psychological impact of change.
Recommendations
Conclusion
The overall purpose of summary report was to examine different scenarios of downsizing employees in the company. It has been examined main downsizing causes that can occur within the organization. Many academics have made a detailed research of these process outcomes on employees and organization. It is closely overviewed impact not only on redundant (victims) but on remaining (survivors) as they experience same level of emotional stress. In order to overcome negative impact on both parties, it is made five areas recommendations with a particular view on organization management action strategy.
References
Books
Armstrong, M., 2009. A handbook of human resource management practice. 11th ed.
Armstrong, M. and Baron, A., 2005. Managing performance: performance management in action. CIPD.
Bach, S., (ed.) 2005. Managing human resources: personnel management in transition. 4th ed.
Taylor, S., 2010, ‘Resourcing and Talent Management’, fifth edition
Journals
Appelbaum, S.H., Donia, M. The realistic downsizing preview: a management intervention in the prevention of survivor syndrome. Career Development International(2001), 5(1) 5-19
Baruch, Y., Hind, P., “Survivor syndrome” – a management myth?", Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 15 Issue: 1 (2000), pp.29 – 45
Brockner, J., ‘Managing the effects of layoffs on survivors’, California Management Review, Vol 34, No.2 (1992), p 9-28
Brockner, J., Jeff, G., Bortz, J., Jeannette, D., Carolyn, J., ‘Layoffs, Equity Theory and work performance: further evidence of the impact of survivor guilt’, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29 Issue: 2, (1986), p373-384, 12p,
Burke, P. J., ‘Identity processes and social stress’, American Journal of Sociology (1991), Vol.56
Ciancio, J. “Survivor’s Syndrome”. Nursing Management (2000), 32 (5) 43-45
Leana, C. R., Feldman, D. C., ‘When mergers force layoffs: some lessons about managing the human resource problems’, Human Resource Planning(1994), Vol.17, No.2
Nienstedt, P.R. ‘Effectively downsizing management structures’, Human Planning (1989), Vol.12, No.2
Noer, D. M. Healing the wounds – overcoming the trauma of layoffs and revitalizing downsized organisations (2009). Revised and updated. Jossey –Bass
Thronhill, A., Gibbons, A.,’”Could do better” is a verdict of research’, People Management (1995), No.1
Online
Wolf, H., 2004. Survivor syndrome: Key considerations and practical steps. Institute of Employment studies . 12(3) [Online] Available at: [Accessed on 4 November 2012]