Does Marks & Spencer have a future ?

Submitted by  :

Aishwarya Iyer  08FN007

Anjan Sethi  08FT012

Anchal Sharma  08HR010

Section A


ABSTRACT

This report analyses the impact of external and internal influences on the business strategies of Marks and Spencer (M&S) between 1996 and 2002, and evaluates the factors affecting them.

The report basically identifies the main factors affecting the demand for M&S products by analyzing the weaknesses and threats faced by the company. It furthers the discussion by pointing out the changes, which the company tried to bring about in its marketing mix elements, branding strategy and value chain to enhance its market share and profitability.

The major finding is that M&S had successful business strategies and marketing plans. However, the company could not maintain these advantages continuously, and faced a slowdown during the period 1998-2001. The main factors that contributed to the slowdown were the insularity shown by the company, which made it less responsive to the changing market conditions.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

  1. Introduction…………………………………………………………………………...4
  2. Factors affecting the demand for M&S products…………...………………………...6
  3. Weaknesses and threats on the demand side of M&S………………………………...8
  4. Changes made to the Marketing mix elements………………………………………10
  5. Brand Management Strategy of M&S…………....………………………………….11
  6. Changes made to the elements of the Value Chain.………………………………....12
  7. Summary…………………………………………………………………………….13
  8. References…………………………………………………………………………...15

Introduction

What was to become Britain’s largest retailer began in Leeds in 1884 as a market stall. It was started by Michael Marks and later supported by Tom Spencer when they decided to set up permanent stores in UK. Together, Marks and Spencer raised 600 pounds and set up a network of shops in the surrounding area that came to be called ‘Marks & Spencer’s Penny Bazaars’.

Until very recently M&S thrived by following a model that built upon Michael Marks and Tom Spencer’s original concept. Its staff viewed the company with pride and they and M&S’s suppliers all saw themselves as part of something very special – part of a collective. It had built a reputation among customers for quality, dependability and classic, if functional, styling. It grew to over 70,000 employees, to be the most visible retailer in Britain’s high streets, to be the provider of 40% of all women’s underwear and 25% of men’s suits sold in the UK, and to be the first retailer in Britain to gross over £1billion in annual profits.

However, the past few years witnessed M&S fall on hard times in quite a spectacular fashion.

The report specifically identifies the reasons for this fall in its market share. It first points out the major factors affecting the demand for M&S products, followed by an analysis of the weaknesses of M&S that it had due to controllable factors affecting the demand for its products, and the threats that it faced with regards to the external or uncontrollable factors affecting demand.

The report then describes the changes that M&S tried bringing about in the elements of marketing mix, i.e. price, product, place & promotion, and the elements of value chain, i.e. inbound logistics, operations, outbound logistics, marketing & sales, and customer services. Also, how these changes steered the brand management strategy of M&S remains an integral part of the discussion in the report.

The underlying concept that we have used as an explanation for the factors affecting M&S is the ‘Law of Demand’. It states that ‘quantity demanded of a good increases as its price falls, and decreases as its price rises, ceteris paribus’.

Mathematically,

Let the demand function be:  Q = a – bP

Join now!

                                   Where, Q – Quantity of the good in question

                                                P – Price of the good in question

                                                &    a, b > 0

                Differentiating the demand ...

This is a preview of the whole essay