• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making

Extracts from this document...


[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME] BEA2003- Management Accounting Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making Ryan Bebbington Word Count 1796 Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making Cost volume profit analysis looks into the relationship between a firms fixed and variable costs and total revenues across a varying level of production. The model will give a predicted level of profit at a given level of production. There are many ways that CVP analysis can be useful for decision making, it is important to distinguish between the different applications of the Economists and Accountants interpretations, as well as other factors involved in decision making. CVP analysis is used in management decisions when forecasting production levels. To use this model effectively, Management will look at different scenarios of output, prices and costs, and see where the model predicts the firm's revenues will cover its total costs. This point is known as the breakeven point. Management can investigate the effects of price increases, changing costs from fixed to variable such as salaries to commission based pay. Managers can also investigate the outcomes from decisions such as making components in house or buying in, retaining or replacing equipment and marketing decisions. ...read more.


The Accountant's interpretation of the fixed cost curve is different to the Economist's view because it meets the Y axis at a higher point, which indicates that the Accountants believe that firms are committed to a higher minimum level of fixed costs. This is because although a firm may reduce its fixed costs to a lower level, as in the Economist's interpretation, the firm can only do this by redundancies and shutting down plants. As the Accountants model only represents a relevant range, the fixed costs cannot be reduced to this level in the short run, when this interpretation is extended outside of the relevant range, a stepped fixed cost and total function will be seen, as in figure 3. The other difference is that the revenue function is linear. This is because in the short run, firms cannot change the price of their products easily; it may also be because of firms competing on non-price, rather than price competition. As Accountants make no attempt to extend the revenue function outside of the relevant range, there is no need to model the firm's decrease in product price to increase demand. The Accountant's interpretation of the Cost Volume Profit model is more appropriate for Management decisions, as management decisions are not concerned with long term information. This is because the Board of Directors will be making the firms long term decisions. ...read more.


If management are not aware of the assumptions made in the data, then they will be unable to draw relevant conclusions from the information. The assumptions i are that all other variables remain constant; there is a constant sales mix, total costs and revenues are linear functions of output, profits are calculated using variable costing, the analysis only applies to the relevant range, costs can be divided into fixed and variable elements, it only applies to the short term, and fixed costs do not change. In conclusion, the Accountant's interpretation of the CVP analysis, as shown by the underlying assumptions, will allow managers to develop a more relevant understanding of the information, so that it can be used more effectively in decision making. If managers tried to use the economists CVP graph, the cost of gathering and interpreting the data would be high, as well as making the information more difficult to understand and less reliable. In the real world, the Accountant's model may be considered too simplistic, as it relies on many assumptions and conditions, which are often not met. This is why it important to understand that the Accountant's CVP model may not be applicable. For the CVP analysis to be effective, managers must be aware of the limitations of the model, otherwise they will be unprepared for any deviations from the outputs of the model. i Drury C. 2004. Management and Cost accounting 6th edition P263-286 ?? ?? ?? ?? Candidate Number: 018255 Management Accounting BEA2003 Ryan Bebbington ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Accounting section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Accounting essays

  1. Case study Pedro Nuts! The use of absorption costing has allowed Knock to explain ...

    considers total production overheads and ignores cost volume profits resulting in managers making a decision based on own initiatives. Marginal costing as described by CIMA terminology is " assignment of only variable to costs to cost units while fixed costs are disregarded as period costs", which shows that this method

  2. The Importance of Communication in Accounting. Todays accountant, especially within the managerial accounting realm, ...

    (GAAS, AU 150.02) We feel that this requirement calls on an auditor to use his or her communication skills with additional finesse. As highlighted in the beginning of this paper, listening skills are paramount as is the ability to ask the correct questions in a way that will both yield

  1. Contemporary issues in management accounting - Target costing,Life cycle costing andQuality ...

    spite of its initial cost and that FRP footbridges are more efficient when longer life is required in severely corrosive environments. QUALITY COSTING Quality Costing involves quantifying the total cost of quality-related efforts and deficiencies. Quality costs help to show the importance of quality-related activities to management; they demonstrate the

  2. An Analysis Of harmonization issues of accounting standards

    By looking at the average of the difference of annual net assets in chart 4-4 it can be seen that the average difference of net asset shows a 'U' curve change trend. Chart 4-4 The Trend of the average of Net Asset Changes from 2002-2007 The average difference started to

  1. Financial statement analysis

    Ethnic and minority groups becoming more affluent * Population is becoming more culturally diverse * People working longer hours * Consumer behaviour is changing, harder to segment market * Introduction of the Internet, new sales channel? * Improvements in operational systems, data storage and monitoring * Movement toward CRM systems

  2. Risk Management Case Study

    risk management and interest rate management, as well as of the impact that repricing and credit risk have on liquidity or cash flow risk, and vice versa. Liquidity is necessary for banks to compensate for expected and unexpected balance sheet fluctuations and to provide funds for growth.

  1. Capital budgeting: advantages and limitations

    The payback method by definition, only takes into account project returns up to the payback period. However, for certain projects which are long term by nature and whose benefits will accrue some time in the future and well beyond the normal payback may not be accepted based on the calculation

  2. Data Analysis for Business Decision Making Problem Questions

    The value of the objective function is: Final value- Blank Number of device IM â 157*168= 26376 Number of device EM â 156*0= 0 Number of device CB â 251*984= 246984 Number of device CD â 168*0= 0 Number of device HDD â 291*936= 272376 Number of device MB â

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work