• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making

Extracts from this document...


[TYPE THE COMPANY NAME] BEA2003- Management Accounting Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making Ryan Bebbington Word Count 1796 Economists and accountants have diametrically opposite views of cost-volume profit (CVP) behaviour but only accountant's have a CVP model that is appropriate for assisting management with decision making Cost volume profit analysis looks into the relationship between a firms fixed and variable costs and total revenues across a varying level of production. The model will give a predicted level of profit at a given level of production. There are many ways that CVP analysis can be useful for decision making, it is important to distinguish between the different applications of the Economists and Accountants interpretations, as well as other factors involved in decision making. CVP analysis is used in management decisions when forecasting production levels. To use this model effectively, Management will look at different scenarios of output, prices and costs, and see where the model predicts the firm's revenues will cover its total costs. This point is known as the breakeven point. Management can investigate the effects of price increases, changing costs from fixed to variable such as salaries to commission based pay. Managers can also investigate the outcomes from decisions such as making components in house or buying in, retaining or replacing equipment and marketing decisions. ...read more.


The Accountant's interpretation of the fixed cost curve is different to the Economist's view because it meets the Y axis at a higher point, which indicates that the Accountants believe that firms are committed to a higher minimum level of fixed costs. This is because although a firm may reduce its fixed costs to a lower level, as in the Economist's interpretation, the firm can only do this by redundancies and shutting down plants. As the Accountants model only represents a relevant range, the fixed costs cannot be reduced to this level in the short run, when this interpretation is extended outside of the relevant range, a stepped fixed cost and total function will be seen, as in figure 3. The other difference is that the revenue function is linear. This is because in the short run, firms cannot change the price of their products easily; it may also be because of firms competing on non-price, rather than price competition. As Accountants make no attempt to extend the revenue function outside of the relevant range, there is no need to model the firm's decrease in product price to increase demand. The Accountant's interpretation of the Cost Volume Profit model is more appropriate for Management decisions, as management decisions are not concerned with long term information. This is because the Board of Directors will be making the firms long term decisions. ...read more.


If management are not aware of the assumptions made in the data, then they will be unable to draw relevant conclusions from the information. The assumptions i are that all other variables remain constant; there is a constant sales mix, total costs and revenues are linear functions of output, profits are calculated using variable costing, the analysis only applies to the relevant range, costs can be divided into fixed and variable elements, it only applies to the short term, and fixed costs do not change. In conclusion, the Accountant's interpretation of the CVP analysis, as shown by the underlying assumptions, will allow managers to develop a more relevant understanding of the information, so that it can be used more effectively in decision making. If managers tried to use the economists CVP graph, the cost of gathering and interpreting the data would be high, as well as making the information more difficult to understand and less reliable. In the real world, the Accountant's model may be considered too simplistic, as it relies on many assumptions and conditions, which are often not met. This is why it important to understand that the Accountant's CVP model may not be applicable. For the CVP analysis to be effective, managers must be aware of the limitations of the model, otherwise they will be unprepared for any deviations from the outputs of the model. i Drury C. 2004. Management and Cost accounting 6th edition P263-286 ?? ?? ?? ?? Candidate Number: 018255 Management Accounting BEA2003 Ryan Bebbington ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Accounting section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Accounting essays

  1. Contemporary issues in management accounting - Target costing,Life cycle costing andQuality ...

    cost of non-quality to an organization; they track the causes and effects of the problem, enabling the working out of solutions using quality improvement teams, and then monitoring progress. Quality costing is a powerful tool for enhancing a company's effectiveness as it is used as a technique in the introduction and development of Total Quality Management (TMQ).

  2. Working Capital Management

    above table indicates that working capital was highest for the year 2007-08. The net working capital has shown a substantial increase from 2005-06 to 2006-07. Statement of changes in working capital is shown below to give the complete picture of variations in working capital.

  1. An Analysis Of harmonization issues of accounting standards

    Table 4-13 Significant Differences Tests & Outcome Summary Sheet 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Net Profit V V V EPS V V V V Net Assets V V V V Net Assets per share V V V ROE V V V V V In the table 4-13, the sign

  2. Case study Pedro Nuts! The use of absorption costing has allowed Knock to explain ...

    It allows Pedro's nut stock inventory from use of overhead absorption rate(OAR) to be accurately evaluated as seen in the extract, Hugh Knock has identified that his venture's total cost will amount to $5625. Another aspect of the absorption costing is that it is required draw up financial accounts and

  1. Discuss and critically evaluate the role of management accountants in providing relevant information to ...

    Brief understanding major differences between financial accounting VS management accounting that is financial accounting focuses on reporting to external parties such as investors, government agencies and so on. Unlike financial accounting, management accounting focuses emphasis internal measures and repots which do not have to follow GAAP yet are based on cost-benefit analysis.

  2. Information for decision making

    Task 2 Easy Jet case study: EasyJet has secured its position as 'Europe's leading low cost airline carrier' since 2002, boasting strong financial stability as well as significant increases in passengers, aircraft and destinations annually not to mention a distinct drop in seat prices to ensure cost advantages over competitors.

  1. Capital budgeting: advantages and limitations

    2.3.1 Payback Period The payback period is defined as the time required to recover the initial investment in a project from operations. The payback period method of financial appraisal is used to evaluate capital projects and to calculate the return per year from the start of the project until the

  2. Data Analysis for Business Decision Making Problem Questions

    The value of the objective function is: Final value- Blank Number of device IM â 157*168= 26376 Number of device EM â 156*0= 0 Number of device CB â 251*984= 246984 Number of device CD â 168*0= 0 Number of device HDD â 291*936= 272376 Number of device MB â

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work