From another literature , Brewster and Harris(2000,p.77) quotes Harzing as arguing that “Old subsidiaries of small MNCs are more likely to have a local managing director, while young subsidiaries of large MNCs are more likely to have an expatriate managing director”. Moreover, expatriates position filling was totally high in Japan and German if compare to Europe countries as USA, UK, and France (Harzing 2000)
For non-commercial organization, there are more rising in international governmental and non-governmental organizations, international aid organizations, and charity organizations which led to the increase in number of global employees. From this reason cause the growth on expatriation rate in these non-profit organizations. However, there was lack of research and evidence on the expatriation in these non-commercial organizations (Brewster and Harris 2000).
Reasons for employing expatriates
According to staffing policy, expatriation was used by MNCs who selecting the employees under the Ethnocentric Staffing Policy. These firms will hire staffs from headquarters so- called parent- country national (PCNs) to work in oversea subsidiaries. The ethnocentric staffing approach frequently results in high level of authority and decision making in parent company (Dereskey 2006). Due to the advantages of this approach, PCNs are well-known and familiar with the company policy, procedure, technologies, product as well as goals of the company. Moreover, they already known how to communicate and cooperate with headquarter.
Tayeb (2003) argued that multinational companies preferred to employ expatriate managers from same nationals as the parent company in significant department such as head of finances. They trusted them to protect their own shareholder’s interests. Besides, they did not entrust that staffs of the host countries are available with the significant expertise skills. Furthermore, the companies desired to increase intercultural capabilities in its organizations others branches in abroad so expatriation was the suitable option to develop their international operations.
Most of multinational companies decided to use expatriates in top management positions or under certain circumstances for example, in the early stage of establishing new subsidies and when there was the shortage of professional skills in the host country. (Hiltrop and Janssens, 1995)
MNCs controlled their foreign subsidiaries operations by using of expatriates in the sensitive jobs especially executive, technical, and financial positions. They believed that these expatriates were more willing to follow the head office policies and look after the interests of parent organization while the local staffs more tend to against and follow their nationals or host –government policy (Tayeb 2000). Moreover expatriates are considered as the loyalty staffs to look after the benefits of parent organizations rather than host.
Besides, most of multinational firms faced with the problem of finding suitable host-country nationals which was frequently more difficult than finding suitable workers within the headquarter company. Furthermore, selecting and recruiting host-country nationals were obstructed by language barrier because the difference on various languages and communications.
Some international companies hired expatriates to maintain cultural values and working pattern in organizations. For instance, banks, airlines, and oil companies were increased on sending expatriates to operate and control the standards in the host location in another country. These expatriates normally stayed in one country long enough to get familiar with the local people (Tayeb 2000). Moreover, they played an important role as observe and control the host-country operation depends on the parent company policy. Besides, they had responsibility to make sure that parent organization have a controlling influence over the host organization.
Furthermore, some parent companies sent their expatriates to the host country as a commitment to guarantee that they gave them the fair treat as offer up-to-date technology management ability and technical training as well as convinced the customers that parent company paid attention to continue and develop the relationship with them (Tayeb 2000).
MNCs motives
According to the empirical evidence from Edström and Galbraith study, they classified the company motive to send out their expatriates into three elements: position filling, management development and organization development.
The first element, position filling is mention to transferring of technical knowledge. There is especially focuses on developing countries which often lack of proficient local nations employees. The second element, management development refers the way of expatriates to inquire their international. Likewise, the way how expatriates adapt and develop themselves for future role in overseas subsidiaries as well as in their headquarter companies. Finally, organization development is related to transfers for changing, renovating, and maintaining in decision process and policy of organization. This factor concerns on coordination and control strategy which consists of two components. The socialization of both expatriate and local employees in term of corporate culture and transfers the verbal information network between subsidiaries and parent company Edström and Galbraith, 1997).
Role of expatriates
From a review of relevant literature of Petison and Johri 2008, the Role of expatriates had been classified into three categories.
The first significant role of expatriates is “controller” the expatriates are responsible to control the subsidiary's strategy and operations. Due to cultural difference, they need to make sure that the subsidiary works according to the headquarters' policy
The second role is “coordinator”, according to this role; expatriates have duty to coordinate between parent company and subsidiaries. Under a coordinator role, expatriates must act as the middlemen who bring Headquarter firm and subsidiaries to achieve the strategic goal. Moreover Petison and Johri 2008 also quotes the study of Edström and Galbraith (1997) which mentioned that expatriates frequently combine both roles of controller and coordinator, especially when they were sent to help the subsidiaries develop and improve their strategies and operations.
The last role, expatriates are act as developer” and “transferor”. The major responsibility of expatriates in this role is helping parent companies to develop the skilled of local employees as well as transferring expertise knowledge and professional skilled to the local workers of subsidiaries. Hence, it is absolutely clear that all of these researchers are describing the same role: to develop local employees' skill through knowledge transfer. (Bennet et al., 2000; Kimmo and Vesa, 2004 and Torbiorn, 1994)
As the role of international knowledge transfer, expatriates played the major role in developing and transferring knowledge within globalizing organizations as well as control international subsidiaries of multinational companies (Sparrow at al, 2004). Knowledge-based asset is the vast significant intangible resource which leads international companies and MNCS obtain competitive advantage and dominate over their rivals (Caves, 1996). Hence, many MNCs used expatriates to transfer their distinctive knowledge assets to their subsidiaries.
Multinational firms used expatriates as control mechanism. With regard to control mechanisms, there are distinguished to four types: personal centralized control, formal bureaucratic control, out put control and socialization and networks control (Harzing, 1994).
Due to global knowledge management strategy that used by MNCs, they tend to focused on personal centralized strategy by assigning expatriates to transfer knowledge through person-to-person contact. For instance, Japan and German MNCs were well- known for their more personal approach toward control while the USA and UK MNCS tend to relied on a more impersonal bureaucratic type of control (Ferner and Varul, 1989; Negandhi and Welge, 1984; Egelhoff, 1988). Moreover, Ferner 1995 mentioned that there were high percentages on staffing parent –country nationals in Japan and German Japanese companies which mostly relied on informal face–to- face control processes to transfer professional skilled, knowledge, and strategic management to their subsidiaries (Ferner 1995).
Furthermore, expatriates played the important role of global team in HR practices. Sparrow et al, (2002 p. 98) quotes Harvey and Novicevic as mentioned that “global team defined as semi-permanent groups who were assembled to facilitate cooperation and communications between headquarters and subsidiaries”). Expatriates in global team helped transfer professional knowledge inter-unit learning, trust, commitment and coordination between parent companies and subsidiaries (Ghoshal and Bartlett, 1995).
Conclusion
As the international markets became importance more and more, there are rapid increases in multinational companies around the world. Moreover global competitions also continue to intensify. From this reason MNCs need to find the distinctive strategy to con troll over their oversea subsidiaries to maintain their competitive advantage and make their organizations dominant over their rivals. From this reason, expatriation is one alternative for MNCs to gain a powerful control over their subsidiaries and make their subsidiaries follows to headquarters policy.
There are many reasons why MNCs employ expatriates. Firstly, by MNCs that follow the Ethnocentric Staffing Policy would hire staffs from the same nation as headquarters so- called parent- country national (PCNs). They employed these staffs as expatriates to work in oversea subsidiaries.
Secondly, multinational companies preferred expatriates to work in significant department such as head of finances. Moreover, they decided to use expatriates in top management positions or under certain circumstances for example, in the early stage of establishing new subsidies and when there was the shortage of professional skills in the host country because they trust them to protect their own shareholder’s interests more than host-country national.
Thirdly, they believed that these expatriates were more willing to follow the head office policies and look after the interests of parent organization. Furthermore, expatriates are considered as the loyalty staffs to look after the benefits of parent organizations rather than host.
Moreover, it was difficult for MNCs to find the suitable host-country national who had professional skilled and knowledge to work in subsidiaries. Some multination firms hired expatriates to maintain and transfer cultural standard values in organizations. Besides, most of parent companies send their expatriates to the host country as a commitment to guarantee that offer up-to-date technology management ability and technical training as well as convinced the customers that parent company paid attention to continue and develop the relationship with them.
There are classified to three factors which cause MNCs send out their expatriates into three elements: position filling, management development and organization development.
According to role of expatriates, they were distinguished to three categories. Expatriates were play the significant role as controller, coordinator, and finally was developer and transferor. The most important role of expatriates is developing and transferring knowledge from headquarters to subsidiaries as well as control international subsidiaries.
Most of MNCs tend to focused on personal centralized strategy by assigning expatriates to transfer knowledge through face-to-face process.
Moreover, expatriates played the major role of global team in HR practices by assembling facilitate cooperation and communications between headquarters and subsidiaries
Based on literature, it showed that most of multinational organizations relied heavily on expatriates although it was very expensive process. However, although there are constantly increasing in staffing expatriates in many MNCs, there still lack of empirical evidences and researches to guarantee that MNCs would gain the competitive advantage from this expatriation process.
Bibliography
Bennet, R., Aston, A., Colquhoun, T. (2000), "Cross-cultural training: a critical step in ensuring the success of international assignments", Human Resource Management, Vol. 39 No.2/3, pp.239-50
Kimmo, R. and Vesa, S. (2004), "International knowledge transfers through expatriates", Thunderbird International Business Review, Vol. 46 No.6, pp.743-70.
Torbiorn, I. (1994), "Operative and strategic used of expatriates in organizations and market structures", International Study and Management Organization, Vol. 24 No.3, pp.5-17.
Brewster, C. and Harris, H. (eds.) (2000) International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. Routledge: London and New York
Cave, R., E. (1996) Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge
Connelly, B., et al (2007) Expatriates and corporate-level international strategy: governing with the knowledge contract, Emerald Group Publishing Limited [Online] Available from:
http://0-www.emeraldinsight.com.lispac.lsbu.ac.uk/Insight/viewPDF.jsp?Filename=html/Output/Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Pdf/0010450315.pdf [Accessed 3December 2008]
Deresky,H. (2006) International Management: Managing Across Borders and Cultures.5th ed. Pearson Prentice Hall :USA
Edström, A. and Galbraith, J., R., (1997) Transfer of Managers as a Coordination and Control Strategy in Multination organization, Administrative Science Quarterly, vol.22 (June), pp.248-263.
Egelhoff, W.G. (1988) Organizing the Multinational Enterprise, Ballinger: Cambridge
Ferner, A. (1995) Country of Origin effects and Human Resource Management in Multinational Companies, work in progress paper, Coventry: Industrial Relations Research Centre, University of Warwick
Ferner, A. and Varul, M., Z. (1999) The German way: German Multinational and Human Resource Management, Anglo-German Foundation for study of Industrial Society: London
Hailey, J. (2000) Localization as an ethical response to internationalization, in: Brewster, C., Harris, H. (eds.) International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. Routledge: London and New York
Harzing, A., W. (2000) MNCs staffing policies for the managing director position in foreign subsidiaries: The result of an innovative method, in: Brewster, C., Harris, H. (eds.) International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. Routledge: London and New York
Harzing, A., W. (2001) And Analysis of the Function of International Transfers of Manager in MNCs [Online] Available from: http://www.harzing.com/download/transfers.pdf [Accessed 5 December 2008]
Hiltrop, J., M. and Janssens, M. (1995) Expatriation: challenges and recommendations in: Jackson, T. (ed.) Cross-cultural management Butterworth-Heinemann: England
Jacob, N. (2004) International Cultural Management. Kogan Page Ltd: London
Negandhi, A., R. and Welge, M. (1984) Beyond Theory Z: Global Rationalization Strategy of American, German and Japanese Multinational Companies, Advances in International comparative management, CA: JAI Press: Greenwich
Petison, P. and Johri, L. (2008) Managing local employees: expatriate roles in a subsidiary, Emerald Group Publishing Limited [Online] Available from:
http://0-www.emeraldinsight.com.lispac.lsbu.ac.uk/Insight/ViewContentServlet?Filename=Published/EmeraldFullTextArticle/Articles/0010460506.html[Accessed 3 December 2008]
Sparrow, P.,Brewster,C., Harris, H. (2004) Globalization Human Resource Management. Routledge: New York
Tayeb, M. (2003) International Management: Theories and Practices. FT Prentice Hall: United Kingdom
Taylor,S.(1998)Employee Resourcing., Institute of Personal &Development: London