• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explore the characteristics of "natural monopoly", and by doing so, relate it to the comparison between competition and monopoly.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

I. INTRODUCTION The intention of this paper is to explore the characteristics of "natural monopoly", and by doing so, this will then relate to the comparison between competition and monopoly. Since there are both pros and cons in monopoly and competition, in which situation will customers be better off? One of the major purposes of this paper is to better understand what natural monopoly is and how consumer welfare can be maximised. Before going into such detail, I think it makes sense to commence by briefly explaining what "economies of scale" is and how it brings about "natural monopoly". To be precise and concise, these occur when mass production of a good results in lower average cost. We shall see how it can be related to natural monopoly later in the content. Throughout this paper, I will derive my argument basing on several authors' publications, namely Estrin and Laidler, Pindyck and Rubinfeld, Miller. Journal of Economic Education will be reviewed for reference as well. II. ECONOMIES OF SCALE AND NATURAL MONOPOLY A) Economies of Scale The term "economies of scale" refers to a situation where the cost of producing a good or service decreases as the volume of production increases. The converse situation in which the cost of producing a good or service increases as the volume of production increases is known as diseconomies of scale. Economies of scale tend to occur in industries with high capital costs in which those costs can be distributed across a large number of units of production. ...read more.

Middle

Third, monopolies may be created through laws and government regulations. Sometimes the government may make it illegal for firms other than the existing one to enter into a market or it may require the firms to obtain some certificates or license in order to do so. However, obtaining this approval is often very difficult, thus deterring others from entering the market. One case is the legal protection for patents. The purpose of this is to provide incentives for innovation. B) Comparison of Perfect Competition and Monopoly As we can see from the previous diagrams that monopoly price is higher than marginal cost, this creates a dead-weight loss. (Recall that under perfect competition, price equals marginal cost). Figure 2.3 (a) illustrates the consumer and producer surplus that is received in a perfectly competitive market. Figure 2.3 (b) illustrates the loss in consumer and producer surplus that results when a perfectly competitive industry is replaced by a monopoly. The area that is between the supply curve and the price line measures producer surplus (orange shade). The area between the price line and the demand curve measures consumer surplus (yellow shade). Now, Figure 2.3 (b) shows us what happens when perfect competition is replaced by monopoly. The introduction of a monopoly firm causes the price to rise from P(pc) to P(m) while the quantity of output falls from Q(pc) to Q(m). The higher price and reduced quantity in the monopoly industry causes consumer surplus to shrink to ACP(m) ...read more.

Conclusion

It plays a role in balancing consumer welfare with cost-effective production in a monopoly. We have seen that government could either set P=MC but subsidise the firm in the long run to keep it in the industry or set P=AC so that it main zero economic profit. Both ways seem reasonable but subsidising firms may represent higher burden on the taxpayers who are in fact the consumers, therefore I think that the second way is more justified and fair in terms of maximising consumer welfare. Although this paper set out quite some justifications on the size of the deadweight loss, I have to admit that, as previously mentioned, the ignorance of the fact that marginal cost curves under perfect competition and monopoly may not be the same and that other elements may affect the size of the deadweight loss such as the effectiveness of barriers to entry and government intervention to simplify the model. However, I think the main purpose of comparing perfect competition and monopoly in general and explaining consumer welfare in both cases can somehow be achieved. VI. REFERENCE 1. ESTRIN, S., LAIDER, D., (1995), Introduction to Microeconomics, 4th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. 2. LEIBENSTEIN, H., (1980), Inflation, Income Distribution and X-efficiency Theory, Barnes & Noble Books-Imports 3. MILLER, R.L., (2000), Economics Today, 10th Edition, New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc. 4. PINDYCK, R.S., RUBINFELD, D.L., (2001) Microeconomics, 5th Edition, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc. ?? ?? ?? ?? EP101 Microeconomic Theory and Applications Assignment 2 1 Connie Loi Kim Ieng IND01535 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our University Degree Microeconomics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related University Degree Microeconomics essays

  1. In this essay, a comparison between monopoly and perfect competition will be given firstly. ...

    What's more, a monopoly can only charge the maximum price that consumers are willing to pay, but can not choose a point off the demand curve. This induce that the marginal revenue curve for a monopoly firm blows its demand curve which equals its average revenue curve and the price of its good, as it is shown in Graph 1.

  2. MP3-Players Market. A connection between brand loyalty, price competition and market entry barriers ...

    Advertising could potentially induce brand loyalty in customers that would otherwise buy the cheapest alternative available on the market ((hioveanu, 2007). However, according to the Kaldor's opinion, advertising is not considered a key determinant of brand loyalty (Kaldor, 1949). In contrast, Lambin found that brand loyalty and its empirical counterpart,

  1. Briefly outline some of the main models of oligopoly in which firms compete according ...

    The leader has full knowledge of how its production decisions will influence the decisions of follower firms, whilst the followers are merely reactionary. The follower in the Stackelberg model is always going to attempt to be a profit maximiser, given the constraints laid upon it by the dominant firm in the industry.

  2. Monopoly. A monopoly may arise as a result of natural forces, or it ...

    All advanced economies award patents giving an exclusive right of supply for a period of years to the originator of an idea, the belief being that without such protection the effort put into inventing would rapidly fall away. Since patents cannot be renewed, the monopoly power that it confers can

  1. How will a firms pricing strategy depend on the structure of the market?

    However each firm still has enough power in the market to be a price maker, thus meaning that each firm has its own demand curve, yet each firm is greatly affected by one another. One example of this is if one firm lowers their price, other firms will follow so not to lose market share.

  2. Do competing firms react to each others actions? Discuss in the context of quantity ...

    Obviously this will involve a sequence of adjustments which will in the end cause a new equilibrium position.

  1. In this essay I will discuss whether the modern market economies are really driven ...

    the planning soon developed because the business is not producing what producers wanted to boost a profit. Hence, essential planning is required for a corporation to be able to predict the demand of the consumers by monthly or yearly in advance.

  2. Perfect competition versus Monopolistic competition

    The number of chicken meat produced is fixed, depending on its cost and revenue; the firm will have different outcomes. According to the law of demand and supply, as the demand is high but supply is low, price will increase.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work