Ritz-Carlton:
The Ritz-Carlton’s strategy involves a new database called “Mystique.” In this system, employees catalogue their observations of the customer, and the database shares this information with the company’s 60 hotels. This system does not require the customer give any direct feedback, but rather, is dependent on employee observations.
Advantages
The customer is not bothered with forms to fill out
The information is shared with its other hotels**
Direct feedback allows for the service to be changed during the stay
**Advantage for hotel, disadvantage for customer**
Disadvantages
Employees may not witness events that allow for observations
Employees may not make accurate assumptions
Because it is shared with the other hotels, it is not very private and customer may not appreciate this
Marriot:
The Marriot’s strategy involves guest’s filling out forms. These forms provide preferences on pillow type, bed type, room location, towels, and other such amenities. It is up to the guest to complete the forms, so this system is optional.
Advantages
If guest fill out forms, a more personalized service may be given
Feedback shrinks gap between what customer expect and what management thinks they expect
Information is shared with 2,600 other hotels
Disadvantages
Customers will expect the service to be tailored exactly to their preferences
Guests are reluctant to fill out forms
Customers may find these preferences to be private
Hilton:
The Hilton’s strategy involves RFID-tagged cards to be distributed to frequent guests. These cards allow the hotel to track the customer around the hotel property. Tracking the customer can better prepare the staff for when the customer arrives. A good example from the article is a bartender who can make a person’s favorite drink when that person steps into the bar, and as a result, that customer does not have to wait for the service to be performed.
Advantages
Can easily track customer preferences
Can better prepare for when a customer arrives
Service is more personalized
Disadvantages
Customer will be reluctant to let hotels track their every move
Customers have to carry the RFID-tagged cards for the system to work
Trying to predict customers wants can lead to difficult moments*
*These difficult moments can happen if for example the bartender tries to make a customer a drink before he/she orders. Customers are unpredictable and look for variety. The bartender could end up making a drink that the customer does not want, and that situation can be embarrassing for the hotel and cost them money.
Hyatt:
The Hyatt’s strategy involves an “e-concierge” system that allows customers to tell the hotel in advance about their preferences. The system focuses on guest history and captures preferences for room type, bed type, and even location near elevators. The system also allows employees to log on to see customer preferences.
Advantages
Allows for more personalized service
Easy for all employees to access guest preference records
Can easily track customer preferences
Disadvantages
Customers have to fill out information before hand
Customer preferences may change
Like the other systems being used, this one may cause privacy issues with the customer
Starwood:
The Starwood’s strategy involves it Preferred Guest loyalty program. On its higher end properties, there is an internal guest-recognition system. This does not involve the customer filling out forms, but rather employees making observations. Customers also have the option to keep any preferences strictly allocated to that one hotel location, or throughout the chain.
Advantages
Allows for more personalized service
Can easily track customer preferences
Allows for more personalized service
Disadvantages
Customers may find issue with sharing personal preferences
System is only featured at higher end chains
In order to better understand and rate each of the hotel systems, five subcategories have been used to determine ratings. Those five subcategories are Installation, Optional, Ease for Consumer, Privacy, and Personalized. Installation rates how easy to how hard it is for the hotel to implement the system. Optional rates if the system of monitoring is optional for the customer. Ease for Customer rates how easy to how hard it is for the customer to notify the hotel of their preferences. Privacy rates how private the preference system is. Personalized rates how personalized the service is within the system. Each category is rated on a scale of 1-10. The total is out of a possible 50 and the rating is derived by taking total divided by possible total.
Based on the table above and assessed rating, I believe Starwood to be the most successful in implementing new services marketing initiatives. I rated Starwood as the best of the five because of a few reasons. Firstly, although the customer does not have full control of what the hotel monitors, the preferences that the hotel does monitor are minimal and unobtrusive. The customer also has the option to keep any preferences from being shared with other hotels in the chain. Based on the system’s ability to be of ease to the customer, its high level of privacy, and its high level of personalization, Starwood’s system will be the most successful.
Based on the table above and assessed rating, I believe Hilton to be the least successful in implementing new services marketing initiatives. Though the Hilton’s system barely edged out the Ritz-Carlton’s, the Hilton’s system is too risky to be successful. With the system requiring guests to carry around RFID-tagged cards, this system is too personal and intrusive for many people to knowingly use it. If guests were to be aware that their movements on the hotel property were being tracked, there would be too many complaints for the system to be worth it. Based on the system’s lack of privacy, and the difficulty of getting customers to go along with it, Hilton’s system will be the least successful.