LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY

GROUP REPORT

“CRITICAL EVALUATION OF ING DIRECTS IN ASPECTS OF MARKETING, OPERATION & FINANCE”

MODULE NAME        :        INTERNATIONAL

                                        BUSINESS & TRADE

MODULE CODE                :        BSNMIM001

SUBMISSION DATE        :        24TH APRIL 2009

LECTURER NAME        :        MR. TIM HARRIS

Analysis of financial performance of ING & competitors

FINANACE

The figures for shows that the operating profit grew from 29% in 2005 to 31% in 2006 and then 24% in 2007 .The improvement in 2006 is as a result of ING Directs having a cost reduction strategy that saw their operational costs reduced during the year. Also ING Directs saw profit growth in countries like Australia, whose profit increased from £73.8M in 2005 to £86M in 2006. This represents an increase of 17% while profits significantly increased by 37% in Germany from 2005 to 2006.

The increase in profitability is also as a result of own-originated mortgage production that has been on the increase. When compared with Example (ING Directs competitors) who posted a total loss of £14M in 2006, compared with a profit of £44M in 2005 this is as a result of consumers reducing. Their borrowing and spending and also increase in bad debts. This comparison means ING directs find a lot better than its competitors (see Appendix B ).

The decline in profitability for ING Directs in 2007 also resulted from the sale of the Degussa Bank which decreased total profit before tax by 23.3%. Also the repositioning of ING Direct UK also dragged down profit, because the UK section had a loss of £120M in 2007.  

 The profit growth from 2005 to 2006 is as a result of efficient market expansion strategy. This saw ING Direct expand into new cities in USA and Germany. This expansion resulted in an increase of mortgage revenues which helped to increase profitability in 2006.

When also compared to Alliance & Leicester who had a profit margin of 39% in 2005 and 2006 and 28% in 2007. The comparison shows that ING Direct was slightly out performed by Alliance & Leicester in those three years. This is as result of the fact that Alliance & Leicester were able to keep their costs stable or under control 2005 to 2007 (see Appendix C).

Alliance & Leicester appeared to have better risk management strategy.

On the other hand the expenses of ING Direct soared 66% in 2006 to 73% in 2007. This is as a result of the expansion of ING Direct into new regions which means the hiring of the new staff and increase in the IT infrastructure setup costs for the new regions (see Appendix B).

The future implication for ING Direct is that a continuous increase in operational costs will impact on their short and long term profitability. This might result in their inability to carry out further planned expansions into new countries and new markets. The management might want to consider the utilization of cost saving synergies to reduce operational costs in the future.

MARKETING

Marketing is the process of planning and executing the thought, pricing, promotion, and distribution of ideas, goods, services, organizations, and events to create and maintain relationships that will satisfy individual and organizational objectives.

(Boone and Kurtz, 1998).

In this part of the report, research focuses on ING DIRECT’S main business elements and goes through basic components  of each and every products and services and critically analysis the main factors affecting their revenue and review present business strategies .our recommendations for future strategies will be based on the analysis of ING DIRECT’S internal and external environments. ING DIRECT is well established and believes in strong growth of its products and services without compromising   on their quality. ING DIRECT mainly target and requires a unique marketing strategy that would support its strategic objectives.

Marketing Mix:

Marketing mix, defined as the set of marketing tools the companies uses to pursue its marketing objectives. (McCarthy, 1996) explained these tools into four sections, which he called the four Ps of marketing: Product, price, place, and promotion.

To achieve the goals of an organisation, the organisation set its marketing strategies by mixing its 4P’s i.e.: Product, Price, Placement and promotions.

Our recommended Marketing mix for ING DIRECT is as follows:

The above mentioned diagram shows how ING Direct used its marketing mix to achieve goals by using unique promotional strategies, innovative ideas of placement, attractive product features and amazing pricing offers.

Join now!

Current Marketing Strategy of ING Direct

Target marketing: 

There was significant growth in the German market from 2006 (€ 332 million) to 2007 (€367 million) this is as a result of ING Direct’s target marketing strategy, which target mainly average individuals by giving them financial products in their local areas. This is a very good strategy because it means average people can obtain services from NG Direct. The downside is that the rich may want premium cost/services.

Innovative promotion:

ING DIRECT uses innovative promotion campaigns to attract new customers e.g. the ‘save your money ...

This is a preview of the whole essay